Optimal gastric pouch reconstruction post-gastrectomy

Shayanthan Nanthakumaran, Stuart A. Suttie, Howard W. Chandler, Kenneth G. M. Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Gastric pouches have the potential to improve nutrition following total gastrectomy, compared with standard reconstruction. However, a consensus view of clinical benefit is not available, at least partly due to a lack of standardization of pouch design or size. This study was undertaken to identify optimal conditions for pouch design.

Methods. A mathematical model was established and a porcine model constructed to evaluate the pressure/volume dynamics of the pouch. A "J" pouch was constructed at anastomotic lengths of 5, 10, 15, and 20 cm. Each pouch was distended with saline and the pressure/volume relationship established.

Results. Mathematically, increasing the anastomotic length of the pouch to 15 cm increases the volume significantly; thereafter, there is minimal benefit of increasing the pouch length further. For smaller pouches (5 and 10 cm) a 350-to 400-ml volume (approximate meal volume in the elderly) is never achieved until higher pressures (45 cmH(2)O) are applied. However, in the larger pouches (15 and 20 cm) a 350-to 400-ml volume is readily achieved at basal pressures of 15 cmH(2)O.

Conclusion. Smaller pouches never achieve adequate volumes at basal pressures; accordingly, it is unlikely that they will lead to any clinical benefit. Further in-vivo studies should therefore be based upon 15-cm pouch designs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-36
Number of pages4
JournalGastric Cancer
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008

Keywords

  • gastric cancer
  • total gastrectomy
  • gastric pouch
  • reconstruction
  • mathematical modeling
  • quality-of-life
  • jejunal pouch
  • food-intake
  • follow-up
  • consequences
  • construction
  • reservoir
  • cancer

Cite this

Optimal gastric pouch reconstruction post-gastrectomy. / Nanthakumaran, Shayanthan; Suttie, Stuart A.; Chandler, Howard W.; Park, Kenneth G. M.

In: Gastric Cancer, Vol. 11, No. 1, 03.2008, p. 33-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nanthakumaran, Shayanthan ; Suttie, Stuart A. ; Chandler, Howard W. ; Park, Kenneth G. M. / Optimal gastric pouch reconstruction post-gastrectomy. In: Gastric Cancer. 2008 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 33-36.
@article{5ffd114bd5324438a68a460dc3e4dee6,
title = "Optimal gastric pouch reconstruction post-gastrectomy",
abstract = "Background. Gastric pouches have the potential to improve nutrition following total gastrectomy, compared with standard reconstruction. However, a consensus view of clinical benefit is not available, at least partly due to a lack of standardization of pouch design or size. This study was undertaken to identify optimal conditions for pouch design.Methods. A mathematical model was established and a porcine model constructed to evaluate the pressure/volume dynamics of the pouch. A {"}J{"} pouch was constructed at anastomotic lengths of 5, 10, 15, and 20 cm. Each pouch was distended with saline and the pressure/volume relationship established.Results. Mathematically, increasing the anastomotic length of the pouch to 15 cm increases the volume significantly; thereafter, there is minimal benefit of increasing the pouch length further. For smaller pouches (5 and 10 cm) a 350-to 400-ml volume (approximate meal volume in the elderly) is never achieved until higher pressures (45 cmH(2)O) are applied. However, in the larger pouches (15 and 20 cm) a 350-to 400-ml volume is readily achieved at basal pressures of 15 cmH(2)O.Conclusion. Smaller pouches never achieve adequate volumes at basal pressures; accordingly, it is unlikely that they will lead to any clinical benefit. Further in-vivo studies should therefore be based upon 15-cm pouch designs.",
keywords = "gastric cancer, total gastrectomy, gastric pouch, reconstruction, mathematical modeling, quality-of-life, jejunal pouch, food-intake, follow-up, consequences, construction, reservoir, cancer",
author = "Shayanthan Nanthakumaran and Suttie, {Stuart A.} and Chandler, {Howard W.} and Park, {Kenneth G. M.}",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10120-007-0450-7",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "33--36",
journal = "Gastric Cancer",
issn = "1436-3291",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal gastric pouch reconstruction post-gastrectomy

AU - Nanthakumaran, Shayanthan

AU - Suttie, Stuart A.

AU - Chandler, Howard W.

AU - Park, Kenneth G. M.

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - Background. Gastric pouches have the potential to improve nutrition following total gastrectomy, compared with standard reconstruction. However, a consensus view of clinical benefit is not available, at least partly due to a lack of standardization of pouch design or size. This study was undertaken to identify optimal conditions for pouch design.Methods. A mathematical model was established and a porcine model constructed to evaluate the pressure/volume dynamics of the pouch. A "J" pouch was constructed at anastomotic lengths of 5, 10, 15, and 20 cm. Each pouch was distended with saline and the pressure/volume relationship established.Results. Mathematically, increasing the anastomotic length of the pouch to 15 cm increases the volume significantly; thereafter, there is minimal benefit of increasing the pouch length further. For smaller pouches (5 and 10 cm) a 350-to 400-ml volume (approximate meal volume in the elderly) is never achieved until higher pressures (45 cmH(2)O) are applied. However, in the larger pouches (15 and 20 cm) a 350-to 400-ml volume is readily achieved at basal pressures of 15 cmH(2)O.Conclusion. Smaller pouches never achieve adequate volumes at basal pressures; accordingly, it is unlikely that they will lead to any clinical benefit. Further in-vivo studies should therefore be based upon 15-cm pouch designs.

AB - Background. Gastric pouches have the potential to improve nutrition following total gastrectomy, compared with standard reconstruction. However, a consensus view of clinical benefit is not available, at least partly due to a lack of standardization of pouch design or size. This study was undertaken to identify optimal conditions for pouch design.Methods. A mathematical model was established and a porcine model constructed to evaluate the pressure/volume dynamics of the pouch. A "J" pouch was constructed at anastomotic lengths of 5, 10, 15, and 20 cm. Each pouch was distended with saline and the pressure/volume relationship established.Results. Mathematically, increasing the anastomotic length of the pouch to 15 cm increases the volume significantly; thereafter, there is minimal benefit of increasing the pouch length further. For smaller pouches (5 and 10 cm) a 350-to 400-ml volume (approximate meal volume in the elderly) is never achieved until higher pressures (45 cmH(2)O) are applied. However, in the larger pouches (15 and 20 cm) a 350-to 400-ml volume is readily achieved at basal pressures of 15 cmH(2)O.Conclusion. Smaller pouches never achieve adequate volumes at basal pressures; accordingly, it is unlikely that they will lead to any clinical benefit. Further in-vivo studies should therefore be based upon 15-cm pouch designs.

KW - gastric cancer

KW - total gastrectomy

KW - gastric pouch

KW - reconstruction

KW - mathematical modeling

KW - quality-of-life

KW - jejunal pouch

KW - food-intake

KW - follow-up

KW - consequences

KW - construction

KW - reservoir

KW - cancer

U2 - 10.1007/s10120-007-0450-7

DO - 10.1007/s10120-007-0450-7

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 33

EP - 36

JO - Gastric Cancer

JF - Gastric Cancer

SN - 1436-3291

IS - 1

ER -