Optimizing subjective measures of consciousness

Morten Overgaard, Bert Timmermans, Kristian Sandberg, Axel Cleeremans

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dienes and Seth (2010) conclude that confidence ratings and post-decision wagering are two comparable and recommendable measures of conscious experience. In a recently submitted paper, we have however found that both methods are problematic and seem less suited to measure consciousness than a direct introspective measure.

Here, we discuss the methodology and conclusions put forward by Dienes and Seth, and why we think the two experiments end up with so different recommendations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)682-684
Number of pages3
JournalConsciousness and Cognition
Volume19
Issue number2
Early online date25 Jan 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Consciousness

Keywords

  • consciousness
  • methodology
  • introspection
  • visual consciousness
  • implicit learning

Cite this

Optimizing subjective measures of consciousness. / Overgaard, Morten; Timmermans, Bert; Sandberg, Kristian; Cleeremans, Axel.

In: Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 19, No. 2, 06.2010, p. 682-684.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Overgaard, Morten ; Timmermans, Bert ; Sandberg, Kristian ; Cleeremans, Axel. / Optimizing subjective measures of consciousness. In: Consciousness and Cognition. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 682-684.
@article{6161b6155edb4c0597f992ed1a6fd3a8,
title = "Optimizing subjective measures of consciousness",
abstract = "Dienes and Seth (2010) conclude that confidence ratings and post-decision wagering are two comparable and recommendable measures of conscious experience. In a recently submitted paper, we have however found that both methods are problematic and seem less suited to measure consciousness than a direct introspective measure.Here, we discuss the methodology and conclusions put forward by Dienes and Seth, and why we think the two experiments end up with so different recommendations.",
keywords = "consciousness, methodology, introspection, visual consciousness, implicit learning",
author = "Morten Overgaard and Bert Timmermans and Kristian Sandberg and Axel Cleeremans",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.018",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "682--684",
journal = "Consciousness and Cognition",
issn = "1053-8100",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimizing subjective measures of consciousness

AU - Overgaard, Morten

AU - Timmermans, Bert

AU - Sandberg, Kristian

AU - Cleeremans, Axel

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Dienes and Seth (2010) conclude that confidence ratings and post-decision wagering are two comparable and recommendable measures of conscious experience. In a recently submitted paper, we have however found that both methods are problematic and seem less suited to measure consciousness than a direct introspective measure.Here, we discuss the methodology and conclusions put forward by Dienes and Seth, and why we think the two experiments end up with so different recommendations.

AB - Dienes and Seth (2010) conclude that confidence ratings and post-decision wagering are two comparable and recommendable measures of conscious experience. In a recently submitted paper, we have however found that both methods are problematic and seem less suited to measure consciousness than a direct introspective measure.Here, we discuss the methodology and conclusions put forward by Dienes and Seth, and why we think the two experiments end up with so different recommendations.

KW - consciousness

KW - methodology

KW - introspection

KW - visual consciousness

KW - implicit learning

U2 - 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.018

DO - 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.018

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 19

SP - 682

EP - 684

JO - Consciousness and Cognition

JF - Consciousness and Cognition

SN - 1053-8100

IS - 2

ER -