Optimum effort to estimate habitat use when the individual animal is the sampling unit

Peter G Smith, Paul Adrian Racey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

1. Studies of habitat use in which the individual animal is the sampling unit should ideally sample each individual sufficiently to achieve a stable estimate of its habitat use. Data are typically obtained by radio-tracking, which can be labour-intensive. Hence, optimization of sampling effort is desirable. A method to determine optimum sampling effort is described with reference to an example from a study of Natterer's bat Myotis nattereri, in which data were collected by radio-tracking with individual bats followed continuously for entire nights.

2. Habitat use by Natterer's bat was assessed by compositional analysis, which compares the composition of habitats used with those potentially available. Therefore, we plotted running per cent foraging time spent over a range of habitat types against the cumulative foraging time recorded. We visually estimated the optimum sum of foraging time required to determine stable estimates of the composition of habitat use from the plots. Then, by reference to the full-time budget, the total tracking effort expended at the point when this optimum amount of foraging data had been recorded was determined and expressed in units of the number of nightly tracking sessions that had been undertaken to collect that amount of foraging data.

3. Stable estimates of habitat use were attained after a mean of 22 +/- 7.7 h of foraging time, which were obtained in a mean of 4.6 +/- 1.9 nights of radio-tracking effort. Thus, in this Natterer's bat study, where habitat preference was assessed by compositional analysis, it was appropriate to aim to collect foraging data during five nights of radio-tracking for each bat sampled.

4. The method presented is also applicable to studies where tracking data are discontinuous. A variation of the method can be applied in studies where a Euclidean distance method is to be used for the analysis of habitat use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)295-300
Number of pages5
JournalMammal Review
Volume35
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • chiroptera
  • compositional analysis
  • Euclidean distance
  • habitat preference
  • Myotis nattereri
  • Natterer's bat
  • radio-tracking

Cite this

Optimum effort to estimate habitat use when the individual animal is the sampling unit. / Smith, Peter G; Racey, Paul Adrian.

In: Mammal Review, Vol. 35, 2005, p. 295-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Peter G ; Racey, Paul Adrian. / Optimum effort to estimate habitat use when the individual animal is the sampling unit. In: Mammal Review. 2005 ; Vol. 35. pp. 295-300.
@article{3e74aa565dc24218ba81675d726510ad,
title = "Optimum effort to estimate habitat use when the individual animal is the sampling unit",
abstract = "1. Studies of habitat use in which the individual animal is the sampling unit should ideally sample each individual sufficiently to achieve a stable estimate of its habitat use. Data are typically obtained by radio-tracking, which can be labour-intensive. Hence, optimization of sampling effort is desirable. A method to determine optimum sampling effort is described with reference to an example from a study of Natterer's bat Myotis nattereri, in which data were collected by radio-tracking with individual bats followed continuously for entire nights.2. Habitat use by Natterer's bat was assessed by compositional analysis, which compares the composition of habitats used with those potentially available. Therefore, we plotted running per cent foraging time spent over a range of habitat types against the cumulative foraging time recorded. We visually estimated the optimum sum of foraging time required to determine stable estimates of the composition of habitat use from the plots. Then, by reference to the full-time budget, the total tracking effort expended at the point when this optimum amount of foraging data had been recorded was determined and expressed in units of the number of nightly tracking sessions that had been undertaken to collect that amount of foraging data.3. Stable estimates of habitat use were attained after a mean of 22 +/- 7.7 h of foraging time, which were obtained in a mean of 4.6 +/- 1.9 nights of radio-tracking effort. Thus, in this Natterer's bat study, where habitat preference was assessed by compositional analysis, it was appropriate to aim to collect foraging data during five nights of radio-tracking for each bat sampled.4. The method presented is also applicable to studies where tracking data are discontinuous. A variation of the method can be applied in studies where a Euclidean distance method is to be used for the analysis of habitat use.",
keywords = "chiroptera, compositional analysis, Euclidean distance, habitat preference, Myotis nattereri, Natterer's bat, radio-tracking",
author = "Smith, {Peter G} and Racey, {Paul Adrian}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00074.x",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "295--300",
journal = "Mammal Review",
issn = "0305-1838",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimum effort to estimate habitat use when the individual animal is the sampling unit

AU - Smith, Peter G

AU - Racey, Paul Adrian

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - 1. Studies of habitat use in which the individual animal is the sampling unit should ideally sample each individual sufficiently to achieve a stable estimate of its habitat use. Data are typically obtained by radio-tracking, which can be labour-intensive. Hence, optimization of sampling effort is desirable. A method to determine optimum sampling effort is described with reference to an example from a study of Natterer's bat Myotis nattereri, in which data were collected by radio-tracking with individual bats followed continuously for entire nights.2. Habitat use by Natterer's bat was assessed by compositional analysis, which compares the composition of habitats used with those potentially available. Therefore, we plotted running per cent foraging time spent over a range of habitat types against the cumulative foraging time recorded. We visually estimated the optimum sum of foraging time required to determine stable estimates of the composition of habitat use from the plots. Then, by reference to the full-time budget, the total tracking effort expended at the point when this optimum amount of foraging data had been recorded was determined and expressed in units of the number of nightly tracking sessions that had been undertaken to collect that amount of foraging data.3. Stable estimates of habitat use were attained after a mean of 22 +/- 7.7 h of foraging time, which were obtained in a mean of 4.6 +/- 1.9 nights of radio-tracking effort. Thus, in this Natterer's bat study, where habitat preference was assessed by compositional analysis, it was appropriate to aim to collect foraging data during five nights of radio-tracking for each bat sampled.4. The method presented is also applicable to studies where tracking data are discontinuous. A variation of the method can be applied in studies where a Euclidean distance method is to be used for the analysis of habitat use.

AB - 1. Studies of habitat use in which the individual animal is the sampling unit should ideally sample each individual sufficiently to achieve a stable estimate of its habitat use. Data are typically obtained by radio-tracking, which can be labour-intensive. Hence, optimization of sampling effort is desirable. A method to determine optimum sampling effort is described with reference to an example from a study of Natterer's bat Myotis nattereri, in which data were collected by radio-tracking with individual bats followed continuously for entire nights.2. Habitat use by Natterer's bat was assessed by compositional analysis, which compares the composition of habitats used with those potentially available. Therefore, we plotted running per cent foraging time spent over a range of habitat types against the cumulative foraging time recorded. We visually estimated the optimum sum of foraging time required to determine stable estimates of the composition of habitat use from the plots. Then, by reference to the full-time budget, the total tracking effort expended at the point when this optimum amount of foraging data had been recorded was determined and expressed in units of the number of nightly tracking sessions that had been undertaken to collect that amount of foraging data.3. Stable estimates of habitat use were attained after a mean of 22 +/- 7.7 h of foraging time, which were obtained in a mean of 4.6 +/- 1.9 nights of radio-tracking effort. Thus, in this Natterer's bat study, where habitat preference was assessed by compositional analysis, it was appropriate to aim to collect foraging data during five nights of radio-tracking for each bat sampled.4. The method presented is also applicable to studies where tracking data are discontinuous. A variation of the method can be applied in studies where a Euclidean distance method is to be used for the analysis of habitat use.

KW - chiroptera

KW - compositional analysis

KW - Euclidean distance

KW - habitat preference

KW - Myotis nattereri

KW - Natterer's bat

KW - radio-tracking

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00074.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00074.x

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 295

EP - 300

JO - Mammal Review

JF - Mammal Review

SN - 0305-1838

ER -