Outcomes of ureteroscopy for stone disease in pregnancy

results from a systematic review of the literature

K A Laing, T B L Lam, S McClinton, N P Cohen, O Traxer, B Somani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Our aim was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ureteroscopy as a primary treatment for pregnant women with symptomatic ureteric stones who have failed conservative management. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of the literature from January 1990 to June 2011 was performed, including all English language articles. Outcome measures were clinical efficacy, in terms of stone clearance and need for additional procedures, and safety in terms of complications. Results: A total of 239 abstracts were screened and 15 studies were identified reporting on 116 procedures. The surgical methods of stone management employed were stone extraction with basket only (n = 55, 47%), laser fragmentation (n = 27, 23%; holmium, n = 20, pulse dye, n = 7), impact lithotripsy (n = 21, 18%), ureteroscopic lithotripsy (n = 6, 5%) and a combination of methods (n = 6, 5%). A post-operative stent was inserted in 64 of 116 procedures (55%). Complete stone clearance was seen in 100 of the 116 procedures (86%). There were 2 major complications (1 ureteral perforation and 1 case of premature uterine contraction) and 7 minor complications (5 urinary tract infections and 2 cases of post-operative pain). Conclusion: This review suggests that stone clearance using ureteroscopy is a relatively safe option in pregnancy with a high success rate.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)380-386
Number of pages7
JournalUrologia Internationalis
Volume89
Issue number4
Early online date10 Nov 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

Ureteroscopy
Pregnancy
Lithotripsy
Holmium
Safety
Uterine Contraction
Urinary Tract Infections
Stents
Pregnant Women
Lasers
Coloring Agents
Language
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pain

Keywords

  • pregnancy
  • stones
  • lithotripsy
  • laser
  • urolithiasis

Cite this

Outcomes of ureteroscopy for stone disease in pregnancy : results from a systematic review of the literature. / Laing, K A; Lam, T B L; McClinton, S; Cohen, N P; Traxer, O; Somani, B.

In: Urologia Internationalis, Vol. 89, No. 4, 12.2012, p. 380-386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{608650764aad4627b5a05e232188cd74,
title = "Outcomes of ureteroscopy for stone disease in pregnancy: results from a systematic review of the literature",
abstract = "Introduction: Our aim was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ureteroscopy as a primary treatment for pregnant women with symptomatic ureteric stones who have failed conservative management. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of the literature from January 1990 to June 2011 was performed, including all English language articles. Outcome measures were clinical efficacy, in terms of stone clearance and need for additional procedures, and safety in terms of complications. Results: A total of 239 abstracts were screened and 15 studies were identified reporting on 116 procedures. The surgical methods of stone management employed were stone extraction with basket only (n = 55, 47{\%}), laser fragmentation (n = 27, 23{\%}; holmium, n = 20, pulse dye, n = 7), impact lithotripsy (n = 21, 18{\%}), ureteroscopic lithotripsy (n = 6, 5{\%}) and a combination of methods (n = 6, 5{\%}). A post-operative stent was inserted in 64 of 116 procedures (55{\%}). Complete stone clearance was seen in 100 of the 116 procedures (86{\%}). There were 2 major complications (1 ureteral perforation and 1 case of premature uterine contraction) and 7 minor complications (5 urinary tract infections and 2 cases of post-operative pain). Conclusion: This review suggests that stone clearance using ureteroscopy is a relatively safe option in pregnancy with a high success rate.",
keywords = "pregnancy , stones, lithotripsy, laser, urolithiasis",
author = "Laing, {K A} and Lam, {T B L} and S McClinton and Cohen, {N P} and O Traxer and B Somani",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1159/000343732",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "380--386",
journal = "Urologia Internationalis",
issn = "0042-1138",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes of ureteroscopy for stone disease in pregnancy

T2 - results from a systematic review of the literature

AU - Laing, K A

AU - Lam, T B L

AU - McClinton, S

AU - Cohen, N P

AU - Traxer, O

AU - Somani, B

N1 - Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Introduction: Our aim was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ureteroscopy as a primary treatment for pregnant women with symptomatic ureteric stones who have failed conservative management. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of the literature from January 1990 to June 2011 was performed, including all English language articles. Outcome measures were clinical efficacy, in terms of stone clearance and need for additional procedures, and safety in terms of complications. Results: A total of 239 abstracts were screened and 15 studies were identified reporting on 116 procedures. The surgical methods of stone management employed were stone extraction with basket only (n = 55, 47%), laser fragmentation (n = 27, 23%; holmium, n = 20, pulse dye, n = 7), impact lithotripsy (n = 21, 18%), ureteroscopic lithotripsy (n = 6, 5%) and a combination of methods (n = 6, 5%). A post-operative stent was inserted in 64 of 116 procedures (55%). Complete stone clearance was seen in 100 of the 116 procedures (86%). There were 2 major complications (1 ureteral perforation and 1 case of premature uterine contraction) and 7 minor complications (5 urinary tract infections and 2 cases of post-operative pain). Conclusion: This review suggests that stone clearance using ureteroscopy is a relatively safe option in pregnancy with a high success rate.

AB - Introduction: Our aim was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of ureteroscopy as a primary treatment for pregnant women with symptomatic ureteric stones who have failed conservative management. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of the literature from January 1990 to June 2011 was performed, including all English language articles. Outcome measures were clinical efficacy, in terms of stone clearance and need for additional procedures, and safety in terms of complications. Results: A total of 239 abstracts were screened and 15 studies were identified reporting on 116 procedures. The surgical methods of stone management employed were stone extraction with basket only (n = 55, 47%), laser fragmentation (n = 27, 23%; holmium, n = 20, pulse dye, n = 7), impact lithotripsy (n = 21, 18%), ureteroscopic lithotripsy (n = 6, 5%) and a combination of methods (n = 6, 5%). A post-operative stent was inserted in 64 of 116 procedures (55%). Complete stone clearance was seen in 100 of the 116 procedures (86%). There were 2 major complications (1 ureteral perforation and 1 case of premature uterine contraction) and 7 minor complications (5 urinary tract infections and 2 cases of post-operative pain). Conclusion: This review suggests that stone clearance using ureteroscopy is a relatively safe option in pregnancy with a high success rate.

KW - pregnancy

KW - stones

KW - lithotripsy

KW - laser

KW - urolithiasis

U2 - 10.1159/000343732

DO - 10.1159/000343732

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 380

EP - 386

JO - Urologia Internationalis

JF - Urologia Internationalis

SN - 0042-1138

IS - 4

ER -