Owning Our Bodies?

The Politics of Self-Possession and the Body of Christ (Hobbes, Locke and Paul)

Bernd Wannenwetsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This essay investigates the idea of self-proprietorship as the concealed ideological basis beneath our most fraught ethical discourses on bodily matters pertaining to birth, health, sex, and death. It questions the sense in which such discourses, and their corresponding societal practices, in turn serve as a practical apology for this troubling anthropology that has come to sustain capitalism. ‘Self-proprietorship’ is analysed for its phenomenological basis in the actual task of learning to own one’s body, traced in its early philosophical instantiations in Hobbes and Locke. These sources are then contrasted with an account of non-proprietary possession of one’s body, rooted in the astonishing authority granted the spouses in Paul’s letter to the Corinthians, a nuanced treatment of porneia and chastity, and the evocative bodily receptions of Christian worship.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-65
Number of pages16
JournalStudies in Christian Ethics
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Possession
Body of Christ
Thomas Hobbes
Discourse
Instantiation
Capitalism
Christian Worship
Health
Reception
Anthropology
Chastity
Apology
Letters
Authority
Corinthians

Keywords

  • body
  • chastity
  • embodiment
  • Hobbes
  • Locke
  • property
  • sexuality
  • St. Paul

Cite this

Owning Our Bodies? The Politics of Self-Possession and the Body of Christ (Hobbes, Locke and Paul). / Wannenwetsch, Bernd.

In: Studies in Christian Ethics, Vol. 26, No. 1, 02.2013, p. 50-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{156f0c40ecbc4439bbe099b5595bcfbc,
title = "Owning Our Bodies?: The Politics of Self-Possession and the Body of Christ (Hobbes, Locke and Paul)",
abstract = "This essay investigates the idea of self-proprietorship as the concealed ideological basis beneath our most fraught ethical discourses on bodily matters pertaining to birth, health, sex, and death. It questions the sense in which such discourses, and their corresponding societal practices, in turn serve as a practical apology for this troubling anthropology that has come to sustain capitalism. ‘Self-proprietorship’ is analysed for its phenomenological basis in the actual task of learning to own one’s body, traced in its early philosophical instantiations in Hobbes and Locke. These sources are then contrasted with an account of non-proprietary possession of one’s body, rooted in the astonishing authority granted the spouses in Paul’s letter to the Corinthians, a nuanced treatment of porneia and chastity, and the evocative bodily receptions of Christian worship.",
keywords = "body, chastity, embodiment, Hobbes, Locke, property, sexuality, St. Paul",
author = "Bernd Wannenwetsch",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/0953946812466491",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "50--65",
journal = "Studies in Christian Ethics",
issn = "0953-9468",
publisher = "Sheffield Academic Press Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Owning Our Bodies?

T2 - The Politics of Self-Possession and the Body of Christ (Hobbes, Locke and Paul)

AU - Wannenwetsch, Bernd

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - This essay investigates the idea of self-proprietorship as the concealed ideological basis beneath our most fraught ethical discourses on bodily matters pertaining to birth, health, sex, and death. It questions the sense in which such discourses, and their corresponding societal practices, in turn serve as a practical apology for this troubling anthropology that has come to sustain capitalism. ‘Self-proprietorship’ is analysed for its phenomenological basis in the actual task of learning to own one’s body, traced in its early philosophical instantiations in Hobbes and Locke. These sources are then contrasted with an account of non-proprietary possession of one’s body, rooted in the astonishing authority granted the spouses in Paul’s letter to the Corinthians, a nuanced treatment of porneia and chastity, and the evocative bodily receptions of Christian worship.

AB - This essay investigates the idea of self-proprietorship as the concealed ideological basis beneath our most fraught ethical discourses on bodily matters pertaining to birth, health, sex, and death. It questions the sense in which such discourses, and their corresponding societal practices, in turn serve as a practical apology for this troubling anthropology that has come to sustain capitalism. ‘Self-proprietorship’ is analysed for its phenomenological basis in the actual task of learning to own one’s body, traced in its early philosophical instantiations in Hobbes and Locke. These sources are then contrasted with an account of non-proprietary possession of one’s body, rooted in the astonishing authority granted the spouses in Paul’s letter to the Corinthians, a nuanced treatment of porneia and chastity, and the evocative bodily receptions of Christian worship.

KW - body

KW - chastity

KW - embodiment

KW - Hobbes

KW - Locke

KW - property

KW - sexuality

KW - St. Paul

U2 - 10.1177/0953946812466491

DO - 10.1177/0953946812466491

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 50

EP - 65

JO - Studies in Christian Ethics

JF - Studies in Christian Ethics

SN - 0953-9468

IS - 1

ER -