Pain assessment tools

Is the Content Appropriate for Use in Palliative Care?

Jacob Chr Hølen (Corresponding Author), Marianne Jensen Hjermstad, Jon Håvard Loge, Peter Fayers, Augusto Caraceni, Franco De Conno, Karen Forbes, Carl Johan Fürst, Lukas Radbruch, Stein Kaasa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Inadequate pain assessment prevents optimal treatment in palliative care. The content of pain assessment tools might limit their usefulness for proper pain assessment, but data on the content validity of the tools are scarce. The objective of this study was to examine the content of the existing pain assessment tools, and to evaluate the appropriateness of different dimensions and items for pain assessment in palliative care. A systematic search was performed to find pain assessment tools for patients with advanced cancer who were receiving palliative care. An ad hoc search with broader search criteria supplemented the systematic search. The items of the identified tools were allocated to appropriate dimensions. This was reviewed by an international panel of experts, who also evaluated the relevance of the different dimensions for pain assessment in palliative care. The systematic literature search generated 16 assessment tools while the ad hoc search generated 64. Ten pain dimensions containing 1,011 pain items were identified by the experts. The experts ranked intensity, temporal pattern, treatment and exacerbating/relieving factors, location, and interference with health-related quality of life as the most important dimensions. None of the assessment tools covered these dimensions satisfactorily. Most items were related to interference (231) and intensity (138). Temporal pattern (which includes breakthrough pain), ranked as the second most important dimension, was covered by 29 items only. Many tools include dimensions and items of limited relevance for patients with advanced cancer. This might reduce compliance and threaten the validity of the assessment. New tools should reflect the clinical relevance of different dimensions and be user-friendly.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)567-580
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Pain Measurement
Palliative Care
Breakthrough Pain
Pain
Compliance
Neoplasms
Quality of Life
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
  • Pain
  • Pain Measurement
  • Palliative Care
  • Prognosis
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Cancer
  • Palliative Medicine
  • Clinical practice

Cite this

Pain assessment tools : Is the Content Appropriate for Use in Palliative Care? / Hølen, Jacob Chr (Corresponding Author); Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen; Loge, Jon Håvard; Fayers, Peter; Caraceni, Augusto; De Conno, Franco; Forbes, Karen; Fürst, Carl Johan; Radbruch, Lukas; Kaasa, Stein.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 32, No. 6, 01.12.2006, p. 567-580.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hølen, JC, Hjermstad, MJ, Loge, JH, Fayers, P, Caraceni, A, De Conno, F, Forbes, K, Fürst, CJ, Radbruch, L & Kaasa, S 2006, 'Pain assessment tools: Is the Content Appropriate for Use in Palliative Care?', Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 567-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.05.025
Hølen, Jacob Chr ; Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen ; Loge, Jon Håvard ; Fayers, Peter ; Caraceni, Augusto ; De Conno, Franco ; Forbes, Karen ; Fürst, Carl Johan ; Radbruch, Lukas ; Kaasa, Stein. / Pain assessment tools : Is the Content Appropriate for Use in Palliative Care?. In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2006 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 567-580.
@article{6fdb4d156c174cbbbccc78a4c157213f,
title = "Pain assessment tools: Is the Content Appropriate for Use in Palliative Care?",
abstract = "Inadequate pain assessment prevents optimal treatment in palliative care. The content of pain assessment tools might limit their usefulness for proper pain assessment, but data on the content validity of the tools are scarce. The objective of this study was to examine the content of the existing pain assessment tools, and to evaluate the appropriateness of different dimensions and items for pain assessment in palliative care. A systematic search was performed to find pain assessment tools for patients with advanced cancer who were receiving palliative care. An ad hoc search with broader search criteria supplemented the systematic search. The items of the identified tools were allocated to appropriate dimensions. This was reviewed by an international panel of experts, who also evaluated the relevance of the different dimensions for pain assessment in palliative care. The systematic literature search generated 16 assessment tools while the ad hoc search generated 64. Ten pain dimensions containing 1,011 pain items were identified by the experts. The experts ranked intensity, temporal pattern, treatment and exacerbating/relieving factors, location, and interference with health-related quality of life as the most important dimensions. None of the assessment tools covered these dimensions satisfactorily. Most items were related to interference (231) and intensity (138). Temporal pattern (which includes breakthrough pain), ranked as the second most important dimension, was covered by 29 items only. Many tools include dimensions and items of limited relevance for patients with advanced cancer. This might reduce compliance and threaten the validity of the assessment. New tools should reflect the clinical relevance of different dimensions and be user-friendly.",
keywords = "Humans, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Pain, Pain Measurement, Palliative Care, Prognosis, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cancer, Palliative Medicine, Clinical practice",
author = "H{\o}len, {Jacob Chr} and Hjermstad, {Marianne Jensen} and Loge, {Jon H{\aa}vard} and Peter Fayers and Augusto Caraceni and {De Conno}, Franco and Karen Forbes and F{\"u}rst, {Carl Johan} and Lukas Radbruch and Stein Kaasa",
note = "Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Professor Geoffrey Hanks for his cooperation with Dr. Karen Forbes in the expert panel, and Dr. Philippe Poulain for his participation in the expert panel.",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.05.025",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "567--580",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pain assessment tools

T2 - Is the Content Appropriate for Use in Palliative Care?

AU - Hølen, Jacob Chr

AU - Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen

AU - Loge, Jon Håvard

AU - Fayers, Peter

AU - Caraceni, Augusto

AU - De Conno, Franco

AU - Forbes, Karen

AU - Fürst, Carl Johan

AU - Radbruch, Lukas

AU - Kaasa, Stein

N1 - Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Professor Geoffrey Hanks for his cooperation with Dr. Karen Forbes in the expert panel, and Dr. Philippe Poulain for his participation in the expert panel.

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Inadequate pain assessment prevents optimal treatment in palliative care. The content of pain assessment tools might limit their usefulness for proper pain assessment, but data on the content validity of the tools are scarce. The objective of this study was to examine the content of the existing pain assessment tools, and to evaluate the appropriateness of different dimensions and items for pain assessment in palliative care. A systematic search was performed to find pain assessment tools for patients with advanced cancer who were receiving palliative care. An ad hoc search with broader search criteria supplemented the systematic search. The items of the identified tools were allocated to appropriate dimensions. This was reviewed by an international panel of experts, who also evaluated the relevance of the different dimensions for pain assessment in palliative care. The systematic literature search generated 16 assessment tools while the ad hoc search generated 64. Ten pain dimensions containing 1,011 pain items were identified by the experts. The experts ranked intensity, temporal pattern, treatment and exacerbating/relieving factors, location, and interference with health-related quality of life as the most important dimensions. None of the assessment tools covered these dimensions satisfactorily. Most items were related to interference (231) and intensity (138). Temporal pattern (which includes breakthrough pain), ranked as the second most important dimension, was covered by 29 items only. Many tools include dimensions and items of limited relevance for patients with advanced cancer. This might reduce compliance and threaten the validity of the assessment. New tools should reflect the clinical relevance of different dimensions and be user-friendly.

AB - Inadequate pain assessment prevents optimal treatment in palliative care. The content of pain assessment tools might limit their usefulness for proper pain assessment, but data on the content validity of the tools are scarce. The objective of this study was to examine the content of the existing pain assessment tools, and to evaluate the appropriateness of different dimensions and items for pain assessment in palliative care. A systematic search was performed to find pain assessment tools for patients with advanced cancer who were receiving palliative care. An ad hoc search with broader search criteria supplemented the systematic search. The items of the identified tools were allocated to appropriate dimensions. This was reviewed by an international panel of experts, who also evaluated the relevance of the different dimensions for pain assessment in palliative care. The systematic literature search generated 16 assessment tools while the ad hoc search generated 64. Ten pain dimensions containing 1,011 pain items were identified by the experts. The experts ranked intensity, temporal pattern, treatment and exacerbating/relieving factors, location, and interference with health-related quality of life as the most important dimensions. None of the assessment tools covered these dimensions satisfactorily. Most items were related to interference (231) and intensity (138). Temporal pattern (which includes breakthrough pain), ranked as the second most important dimension, was covered by 29 items only. Many tools include dimensions and items of limited relevance for patients with advanced cancer. This might reduce compliance and threaten the validity of the assessment. New tools should reflect the clinical relevance of different dimensions and be user-friendly.

KW - Humans

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Pain

KW - Pain Measurement

KW - Palliative Care

KW - Prognosis

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Sensitivity and Specificity

KW - Cancer

KW - Palliative Medicine

KW - Clinical practice

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.05.025

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.05.025

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 567

EP - 580

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 6

ER -