Parameter identification for conceptual modelling using combined behavioural knowledge

S. M. Dunn, Christopher Soulsby, A. Lilley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Improved methods for identification of conceptual parameter values are necessary if hydrological models are to be applied to catchments other than those to which they have been specifically calibrated. A technique has been devised to calculate conceptual parameter sets of a semi-distributed hydrological model using a soil hydrological classification in addition to topographic data. The method is tested in this paper by converting multiple parameter sets, calibrated to two separate catchments, into parameter sets for a third catchment.

The prediction capabilities of the parameter sets are studied for the new catchment in terms of both simulation of total streamflow and the separation of that flow into three components, corresponding to groundwater recharge, subsurface flow, and surface runoff. The results from an end-member mixing analysis (EMMA) using geochemical tracers are employed to assess the flow separation. Results from the simulations demonstrate that there is quite wide variability in the success of the parameter sets at predicting streamflow for the new catchment. There is also considerable variation in the predicted stream flow separation, with only 28 out of 500 Simulations giving a comparable result to the EMMA. By accepting or rejecting simulations using these results, the EMMA can be used to reduce the structural uncertainty of the model. However, it does not help to reduce constraints on acceptable parameter Values for the Simulations, and further research is still necessary to improve parameter identifiability. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-343
Number of pages14
JournalHydrological Processes
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Keywords

  • parameter
  • conceptual
  • model
  • soil hydrological classification
  • end-member mixing analysis
  • catchment
  • ungauged
  • UPLAND SCOTTISH CATCHMENT
  • SCALE HYDROLOGICAL MODEL
  • HYDROGRAPH SEPARATION
  • MOUNTAINOUS CATCHMENT
  • CALIBRATION
  • VALIDATION
  • FLOW

Cite this

Parameter identification for conceptual modelling using combined behavioural knowledge. / Dunn, S. M.; Soulsby, Christopher; Lilley, A.

In: Hydrological Processes, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2003, p. 329-343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{71f1f2bcb0b444f9b8766eee8b1a9107,
title = "Parameter identification for conceptual modelling using combined behavioural knowledge",
abstract = "Improved methods for identification of conceptual parameter values are necessary if hydrological models are to be applied to catchments other than those to which they have been specifically calibrated. A technique has been devised to calculate conceptual parameter sets of a semi-distributed hydrological model using a soil hydrological classification in addition to topographic data. The method is tested in this paper by converting multiple parameter sets, calibrated to two separate catchments, into parameter sets for a third catchment.The prediction capabilities of the parameter sets are studied for the new catchment in terms of both simulation of total streamflow and the separation of that flow into three components, corresponding to groundwater recharge, subsurface flow, and surface runoff. The results from an end-member mixing analysis (EMMA) using geochemical tracers are employed to assess the flow separation. Results from the simulations demonstrate that there is quite wide variability in the success of the parameter sets at predicting streamflow for the new catchment. There is also considerable variation in the predicted stream flow separation, with only 28 out of 500 Simulations giving a comparable result to the EMMA. By accepting or rejecting simulations using these results, the EMMA can be used to reduce the structural uncertainty of the model. However, it does not help to reduce constraints on acceptable parameter Values for the Simulations, and further research is still necessary to improve parameter identifiability. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.",
keywords = "parameter, conceptual, model, soil hydrological classification, end-member mixing analysis, catchment, ungauged, UPLAND SCOTTISH CATCHMENT, SCALE HYDROLOGICAL MODEL, HYDROGRAPH SEPARATION, MOUNTAINOUS CATCHMENT, CALIBRATION, VALIDATION, FLOW",
author = "Dunn, {S. M.} and Christopher Soulsby and A. Lilley",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1002/hyp.1127",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "329--343",
journal = "Hydrological Processes",
issn = "0885-6087",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parameter identification for conceptual modelling using combined behavioural knowledge

AU - Dunn, S. M.

AU - Soulsby, Christopher

AU - Lilley, A.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Improved methods for identification of conceptual parameter values are necessary if hydrological models are to be applied to catchments other than those to which they have been specifically calibrated. A technique has been devised to calculate conceptual parameter sets of a semi-distributed hydrological model using a soil hydrological classification in addition to topographic data. The method is tested in this paper by converting multiple parameter sets, calibrated to two separate catchments, into parameter sets for a third catchment.The prediction capabilities of the parameter sets are studied for the new catchment in terms of both simulation of total streamflow and the separation of that flow into three components, corresponding to groundwater recharge, subsurface flow, and surface runoff. The results from an end-member mixing analysis (EMMA) using geochemical tracers are employed to assess the flow separation. Results from the simulations demonstrate that there is quite wide variability in the success of the parameter sets at predicting streamflow for the new catchment. There is also considerable variation in the predicted stream flow separation, with only 28 out of 500 Simulations giving a comparable result to the EMMA. By accepting or rejecting simulations using these results, the EMMA can be used to reduce the structural uncertainty of the model. However, it does not help to reduce constraints on acceptable parameter Values for the Simulations, and further research is still necessary to improve parameter identifiability. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

AB - Improved methods for identification of conceptual parameter values are necessary if hydrological models are to be applied to catchments other than those to which they have been specifically calibrated. A technique has been devised to calculate conceptual parameter sets of a semi-distributed hydrological model using a soil hydrological classification in addition to topographic data. The method is tested in this paper by converting multiple parameter sets, calibrated to two separate catchments, into parameter sets for a third catchment.The prediction capabilities of the parameter sets are studied for the new catchment in terms of both simulation of total streamflow and the separation of that flow into three components, corresponding to groundwater recharge, subsurface flow, and surface runoff. The results from an end-member mixing analysis (EMMA) using geochemical tracers are employed to assess the flow separation. Results from the simulations demonstrate that there is quite wide variability in the success of the parameter sets at predicting streamflow for the new catchment. There is also considerable variation in the predicted stream flow separation, with only 28 out of 500 Simulations giving a comparable result to the EMMA. By accepting or rejecting simulations using these results, the EMMA can be used to reduce the structural uncertainty of the model. However, it does not help to reduce constraints on acceptable parameter Values for the Simulations, and further research is still necessary to improve parameter identifiability. Copyright (C) 2003 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

KW - parameter

KW - conceptual

KW - model

KW - soil hydrological classification

KW - end-member mixing analysis

KW - catchment

KW - ungauged

KW - UPLAND SCOTTISH CATCHMENT

KW - SCALE HYDROLOGICAL MODEL

KW - HYDROGRAPH SEPARATION

KW - MOUNTAINOUS CATCHMENT

KW - CALIBRATION

KW - VALIDATION

KW - FLOW

U2 - 10.1002/hyp.1127

DO - 10.1002/hyp.1127

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 329

EP - 343

JO - Hydrological Processes

JF - Hydrological Processes

SN - 0885-6087

IS - 2

ER -