Parasitism and developmental plasticity in Alpine swift nestlings

P Bize*, A Roulin, LF Bersier, D Pfluger, H Richner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

1. Development plasticity is a common evolutionary and phenotypic response to poor growth condition, in particular in organisms with determinate growth such as most birds and mammals. Because various body structures can contribute differently to overall fitness, natural selection will adjust the degree of plasticity of each structure to its proportionate contribution to fitness at a given life stage.

2. Two non-mutually exclusive mechanisms can account for plasticity in the growth of offspring to compensate for the effect of parasites. First, if parasite infestation levels fluctuate over the nestling period, parasitized young may show reduced growth until peak parasite infestation, and accelerated growth once the conditions improve (the accelerated growth hypothesis). Secondly, if the period of tissue maturation is not fixed in time, hosts may grow slower than parasite-free hosts but for a longer period of time (the delayed maturation hypothesis).

3. To test whether hosts compensate for the effects of parasites on their development, the load of the blood-sucking louse-fly Crataerina melbae Rondani in the nests of Alpine swifts, Apus melba Linnaeus, was increased or decreased experimentally. Parasite prevalence was 100% in both treatments, but intensity (no. of parasites per nestling) was significantly lower for deparasitized nestlings. In both treatments, parasite intensity increased up to halfway through the rearing period (i.e. 30 days of age) and decreased afterwards.

4. In line with the accelerated growth hypothesis, wings of parasitized nestlings grew at a lower rate than those of deparasitized ones before the peak of parasite infestation, but at a greater rate after the peak. Louse-flies had no significant effect on the growth of body mass. In agreement with the delayed-maturation hypothesis, wings of parasitized nestlings grew for 3 additional days and were of similar size at fledging as in deparasitized birds.

5. In summary, the present study shows in a wild bird population that nestling hosts can compensate for the effect of parasitism on their phenotype. It emphasizes the need to take the dynamics of parasite populations into account in studies of host-parasite relationships, and to investigate the effect of parasites on host development over the entire growing period rather than only at fledging, as employed traditionally.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)633-639
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Animal Ecology
Volume72
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2003

Keywords

  • Apus melba
  • compensatory growth
  • Crataerina melbae
  • delayed maturation
  • host-parasite interaction
  • BARN SWALLOW
  • APUS-APUS
  • GROWTH
  • HIPPOBOSCIDAE
  • DIPTERA
  • REPRODUCTION
  • ECTOPARASITE
  • QUALITY
  • SIZE

Cite this

Bize, P., Roulin, A., Bersier, LF., Pfluger, D., & Richner, H. (2003). Parasitism and developmental plasticity in Alpine swift nestlings. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72(4), 633-639.

Parasitism and developmental plasticity in Alpine swift nestlings. / Bize, P; Roulin, A; Bersier, LF; Pfluger, D; Richner, H.

In: Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 72, No. 4, 07.2003, p. 633-639.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bize, P, Roulin, A, Bersier, LF, Pfluger, D & Richner, H 2003, 'Parasitism and developmental plasticity in Alpine swift nestlings', Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 633-639.
Bize P, Roulin A, Bersier LF, Pfluger D, Richner H. Parasitism and developmental plasticity in Alpine swift nestlings. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2003 Jul;72(4):633-639.
Bize, P ; Roulin, A ; Bersier, LF ; Pfluger, D ; Richner, H. / Parasitism and developmental plasticity in Alpine swift nestlings. In: Journal of Animal Ecology. 2003 ; Vol. 72, No. 4. pp. 633-639.
@article{ce18b06401bc4f3fb5ddef30cb178bcd,
title = "Parasitism and developmental plasticity in Alpine swift nestlings",
abstract = "1. Development plasticity is a common evolutionary and phenotypic response to poor growth condition, in particular in organisms with determinate growth such as most birds and mammals. Because various body structures can contribute differently to overall fitness, natural selection will adjust the degree of plasticity of each structure to its proportionate contribution to fitness at a given life stage.2. Two non-mutually exclusive mechanisms can account for plasticity in the growth of offspring to compensate for the effect of parasites. First, if parasite infestation levels fluctuate over the nestling period, parasitized young may show reduced growth until peak parasite infestation, and accelerated growth once the conditions improve (the accelerated growth hypothesis). Secondly, if the period of tissue maturation is not fixed in time, hosts may grow slower than parasite-free hosts but for a longer period of time (the delayed maturation hypothesis).3. To test whether hosts compensate for the effects of parasites on their development, the load of the blood-sucking louse-fly Crataerina melbae Rondani in the nests of Alpine swifts, Apus melba Linnaeus, was increased or decreased experimentally. Parasite prevalence was 100{\%} in both treatments, but intensity (no. of parasites per nestling) was significantly lower for deparasitized nestlings. In both treatments, parasite intensity increased up to halfway through the rearing period (i.e. 30 days of age) and decreased afterwards.4. In line with the accelerated growth hypothesis, wings of parasitized nestlings grew at a lower rate than those of deparasitized ones before the peak of parasite infestation, but at a greater rate after the peak. Louse-flies had no significant effect on the growth of body mass. In agreement with the delayed-maturation hypothesis, wings of parasitized nestlings grew for 3 additional days and were of similar size at fledging as in deparasitized birds.5. In summary, the present study shows in a wild bird population that nestling hosts can compensate for the effect of parasitism on their phenotype. It emphasizes the need to take the dynamics of parasite populations into account in studies of host-parasite relationships, and to investigate the effect of parasites on host development over the entire growing period rather than only at fledging, as employed traditionally.",
keywords = "Apus melba, compensatory growth, Crataerina melbae, delayed maturation, host-parasite interaction, BARN SWALLOW, APUS-APUS, GROWTH, HIPPOBOSCIDAE, DIPTERA, REPRODUCTION, ECTOPARASITE, QUALITY, SIZE",
author = "P Bize and A Roulin and LF Bersier and D Pfluger and H Richner",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "633--639",
journal = "Journal of Animal Ecology",
issn = "0021-8790",
publisher = "BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parasitism and developmental plasticity in Alpine swift nestlings

AU - Bize, P

AU - Roulin, A

AU - Bersier, LF

AU - Pfluger, D

AU - Richner, H

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - 1. Development plasticity is a common evolutionary and phenotypic response to poor growth condition, in particular in organisms with determinate growth such as most birds and mammals. Because various body structures can contribute differently to overall fitness, natural selection will adjust the degree of plasticity of each structure to its proportionate contribution to fitness at a given life stage.2. Two non-mutually exclusive mechanisms can account for plasticity in the growth of offspring to compensate for the effect of parasites. First, if parasite infestation levels fluctuate over the nestling period, parasitized young may show reduced growth until peak parasite infestation, and accelerated growth once the conditions improve (the accelerated growth hypothesis). Secondly, if the period of tissue maturation is not fixed in time, hosts may grow slower than parasite-free hosts but for a longer period of time (the delayed maturation hypothesis).3. To test whether hosts compensate for the effects of parasites on their development, the load of the blood-sucking louse-fly Crataerina melbae Rondani in the nests of Alpine swifts, Apus melba Linnaeus, was increased or decreased experimentally. Parasite prevalence was 100% in both treatments, but intensity (no. of parasites per nestling) was significantly lower for deparasitized nestlings. In both treatments, parasite intensity increased up to halfway through the rearing period (i.e. 30 days of age) and decreased afterwards.4. In line with the accelerated growth hypothesis, wings of parasitized nestlings grew at a lower rate than those of deparasitized ones before the peak of parasite infestation, but at a greater rate after the peak. Louse-flies had no significant effect on the growth of body mass. In agreement with the delayed-maturation hypothesis, wings of parasitized nestlings grew for 3 additional days and were of similar size at fledging as in deparasitized birds.5. In summary, the present study shows in a wild bird population that nestling hosts can compensate for the effect of parasitism on their phenotype. It emphasizes the need to take the dynamics of parasite populations into account in studies of host-parasite relationships, and to investigate the effect of parasites on host development over the entire growing period rather than only at fledging, as employed traditionally.

AB - 1. Development plasticity is a common evolutionary and phenotypic response to poor growth condition, in particular in organisms with determinate growth such as most birds and mammals. Because various body structures can contribute differently to overall fitness, natural selection will adjust the degree of plasticity of each structure to its proportionate contribution to fitness at a given life stage.2. Two non-mutually exclusive mechanisms can account for plasticity in the growth of offspring to compensate for the effect of parasites. First, if parasite infestation levels fluctuate over the nestling period, parasitized young may show reduced growth until peak parasite infestation, and accelerated growth once the conditions improve (the accelerated growth hypothesis). Secondly, if the period of tissue maturation is not fixed in time, hosts may grow slower than parasite-free hosts but for a longer period of time (the delayed maturation hypothesis).3. To test whether hosts compensate for the effects of parasites on their development, the load of the blood-sucking louse-fly Crataerina melbae Rondani in the nests of Alpine swifts, Apus melba Linnaeus, was increased or decreased experimentally. Parasite prevalence was 100% in both treatments, but intensity (no. of parasites per nestling) was significantly lower for deparasitized nestlings. In both treatments, parasite intensity increased up to halfway through the rearing period (i.e. 30 days of age) and decreased afterwards.4. In line with the accelerated growth hypothesis, wings of parasitized nestlings grew at a lower rate than those of deparasitized ones before the peak of parasite infestation, but at a greater rate after the peak. Louse-flies had no significant effect on the growth of body mass. In agreement with the delayed-maturation hypothesis, wings of parasitized nestlings grew for 3 additional days and were of similar size at fledging as in deparasitized birds.5. In summary, the present study shows in a wild bird population that nestling hosts can compensate for the effect of parasitism on their phenotype. It emphasizes the need to take the dynamics of parasite populations into account in studies of host-parasite relationships, and to investigate the effect of parasites on host development over the entire growing period rather than only at fledging, as employed traditionally.

KW - Apus melba

KW - compensatory growth

KW - Crataerina melbae

KW - delayed maturation

KW - host-parasite interaction

KW - BARN SWALLOW

KW - APUS-APUS

KW - GROWTH

KW - HIPPOBOSCIDAE

KW - DIPTERA

KW - REPRODUCTION

KW - ECTOPARASITE

KW - QUALITY

KW - SIZE

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 633

EP - 639

JO - Journal of Animal Ecology

JF - Journal of Animal Ecology

SN - 0021-8790

IS - 4

ER -