Participatory indicator development

Mark Reed, Andrew J. Dougill, Timothy R. Baker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

152 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Given the growing popularity of indicators among policy-makers to measure progress toward conservation and sustainability goals, there is an urgent need to develop indicators that can be used accurately by both specialists and nonspecialists, drawing from the knowledge possessed by each group. This paper uses a case study from the Kalahari, Botswana to show how participatory and ecological methods can be combined to develop robust indicators that are accessible to a range of users to monitor and enhance the sustainability of land management. First, potential environmental sustainability indicators were elicited from pastoralists in three study sites. This knowledge was then evaluated by pastoralists, before being tested empirically using ecological and soil- based techniques. Despite the wealth of local knowledge about indicators, this knowledge was thinly spread. The knowledge was more holistic than published indicator lists for monitoring rangelands, encompassing vegetation, soil, livestock, wild animal, and socioeconomic indicators. Pastoralist preferences for vegetation and livestock indicators match recent shifts in ecological theory suggesting that livestock populations reach equilibrium with key forage resources in semiarid environments. Although most indicators suggested by pastoralists were validated through empirical work (e. g., decreased grass cover and soil organic matter content, and increased abundance of Acacia mellifera and thatching grass), they were not always suf. ciently accurate or reliable for objective degradation assessment, showing that local knowledge cannot be accepted unquestioningly. We suggest that, by combining participatory and ecological approaches, it is possible to derive more accurate and relevant indicators than either approach could achieve alone.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1253-1269
Number of pages17
JournalEcological Applications
Volume18
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2008

Keywords

  • Botswana
  • Kalahari
  • land degradation
  • local knowledge
  • participation
  • southern Africa
  • sustainability indicators
  • environmental-management
  • bush encroachment
  • rangeland health
  • knowledge
  • vegetation
  • nonequilibrium
  • soil

Cite this

Reed, M., Dougill, A. J., & Baker, T. R. (2008). Participatory indicator development. Ecological Applications, 18(5), 1253-1269.

Participatory indicator development. / Reed, Mark; Dougill, Andrew J.; Baker, Timothy R.

In: Ecological Applications, Vol. 18, No. 5, 07.2008, p. 1253-1269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reed, M, Dougill, AJ & Baker, TR 2008, 'Participatory indicator development', Ecological Applications, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1253-1269.
Reed M, Dougill AJ, Baker TR. Participatory indicator development. Ecological Applications. 2008 Jul;18(5):1253-1269.
Reed, Mark ; Dougill, Andrew J. ; Baker, Timothy R. / Participatory indicator development. In: Ecological Applications. 2008 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 1253-1269.
@article{1ac3906ec74c4c5681007a95e3cc7e54,
title = "Participatory indicator development",
abstract = "Given the growing popularity of indicators among policy-makers to measure progress toward conservation and sustainability goals, there is an urgent need to develop indicators that can be used accurately by both specialists and nonspecialists, drawing from the knowledge possessed by each group. This paper uses a case study from the Kalahari, Botswana to show how participatory and ecological methods can be combined to develop robust indicators that are accessible to a range of users to monitor and enhance the sustainability of land management. First, potential environmental sustainability indicators were elicited from pastoralists in three study sites. This knowledge was then evaluated by pastoralists, before being tested empirically using ecological and soil- based techniques. Despite the wealth of local knowledge about indicators, this knowledge was thinly spread. The knowledge was more holistic than published indicator lists for monitoring rangelands, encompassing vegetation, soil, livestock, wild animal, and socioeconomic indicators. Pastoralist preferences for vegetation and livestock indicators match recent shifts in ecological theory suggesting that livestock populations reach equilibrium with key forage resources in semiarid environments. Although most indicators suggested by pastoralists were validated through empirical work (e. g., decreased grass cover and soil organic matter content, and increased abundance of Acacia mellifera and thatching grass), they were not always suf. ciently accurate or reliable for objective degradation assessment, showing that local knowledge cannot be accepted unquestioningly. We suggest that, by combining participatory and ecological approaches, it is possible to derive more accurate and relevant indicators than either approach could achieve alone.",
keywords = "Botswana, Kalahari, land degradation, local knowledge, participation, southern Africa, sustainability indicators, environmental-management, bush encroachment, rangeland health, knowledge, vegetation, nonequilibrium, soil",
author = "Mark Reed and Dougill, {Andrew J.} and Baker, {Timothy R.}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1253--1269",
journal = "Ecological Applications",
issn = "1051-0761",
publisher = "Ecological Society of America",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participatory indicator development

AU - Reed, Mark

AU - Dougill, Andrew J.

AU - Baker, Timothy R.

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - Given the growing popularity of indicators among policy-makers to measure progress toward conservation and sustainability goals, there is an urgent need to develop indicators that can be used accurately by both specialists and nonspecialists, drawing from the knowledge possessed by each group. This paper uses a case study from the Kalahari, Botswana to show how participatory and ecological methods can be combined to develop robust indicators that are accessible to a range of users to monitor and enhance the sustainability of land management. First, potential environmental sustainability indicators were elicited from pastoralists in three study sites. This knowledge was then evaluated by pastoralists, before being tested empirically using ecological and soil- based techniques. Despite the wealth of local knowledge about indicators, this knowledge was thinly spread. The knowledge was more holistic than published indicator lists for monitoring rangelands, encompassing vegetation, soil, livestock, wild animal, and socioeconomic indicators. Pastoralist preferences for vegetation and livestock indicators match recent shifts in ecological theory suggesting that livestock populations reach equilibrium with key forage resources in semiarid environments. Although most indicators suggested by pastoralists were validated through empirical work (e. g., decreased grass cover and soil organic matter content, and increased abundance of Acacia mellifera and thatching grass), they were not always suf. ciently accurate or reliable for objective degradation assessment, showing that local knowledge cannot be accepted unquestioningly. We suggest that, by combining participatory and ecological approaches, it is possible to derive more accurate and relevant indicators than either approach could achieve alone.

AB - Given the growing popularity of indicators among policy-makers to measure progress toward conservation and sustainability goals, there is an urgent need to develop indicators that can be used accurately by both specialists and nonspecialists, drawing from the knowledge possessed by each group. This paper uses a case study from the Kalahari, Botswana to show how participatory and ecological methods can be combined to develop robust indicators that are accessible to a range of users to monitor and enhance the sustainability of land management. First, potential environmental sustainability indicators were elicited from pastoralists in three study sites. This knowledge was then evaluated by pastoralists, before being tested empirically using ecological and soil- based techniques. Despite the wealth of local knowledge about indicators, this knowledge was thinly spread. The knowledge was more holistic than published indicator lists for monitoring rangelands, encompassing vegetation, soil, livestock, wild animal, and socioeconomic indicators. Pastoralist preferences for vegetation and livestock indicators match recent shifts in ecological theory suggesting that livestock populations reach equilibrium with key forage resources in semiarid environments. Although most indicators suggested by pastoralists were validated through empirical work (e. g., decreased grass cover and soil organic matter content, and increased abundance of Acacia mellifera and thatching grass), they were not always suf. ciently accurate or reliable for objective degradation assessment, showing that local knowledge cannot be accepted unquestioningly. We suggest that, by combining participatory and ecological approaches, it is possible to derive more accurate and relevant indicators than either approach could achieve alone.

KW - Botswana

KW - Kalahari

KW - land degradation

KW - local knowledge

KW - participation

KW - southern Africa

KW - sustainability indicators

KW - environmental-management

KW - bush encroachment

KW - rangeland health

KW - knowledge

KW - vegetation

KW - nonequilibrium

KW - soil

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1253

EP - 1269

JO - Ecological Applications

JF - Ecological Applications

SN - 1051-0761

IS - 5

ER -