Partnership Not Dialogue

Lent and Ramadan under the Same Roof

Christopher Craig Brittain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Since January 2011, members of a mosque in Aberdeen, Scotland have been meeting to pray in an Episcopal Church. Based on ethnographic research in both congregations, this paper explores the reasons each community entered into the relationship, the public reaction that erupted when the existence of the arrangement was discovered, and how members of each group describe the benefits of the situation. The essay argues that this relationship is better described as an ‘inter-faith partnership’ rather than an ‘inter-faith dialogue’. Moreover, it is suggested that the relationship was successful largely due to this distinction. The discussion thus challenges the predominance of ‘dialogue’ as the primary model for conceiving interfaith relationships and engagements.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)190-209
Number of pages20
JournalEcclesial Practices
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

faith
dialogue
mosque
church
community
Group

Keywords

  • interfaith
  • Islam
  • Christianity
  • dialogue
  • ethnography
  • interreligious
  • Episcopal Church
  • Muslim
  • Christian

Cite this

Partnership Not Dialogue : Lent and Ramadan under the Same Roof. / Brittain, Christopher Craig.

In: Ecclesial Practices, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2016, p. 190-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brittain, Christopher Craig. / Partnership Not Dialogue : Lent and Ramadan under the Same Roof. In: Ecclesial Practices. 2016 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 190-209.
@article{30697c56dd0646e28983bf2f4c73f6f0,
title = "Partnership Not Dialogue: Lent and Ramadan under the Same Roof",
abstract = "Since January 2011, members of a mosque in Aberdeen, Scotland have been meeting to pray in an Episcopal Church. Based on ethnographic research in both congregations, this paper explores the reasons each community entered into the relationship, the public reaction that erupted when the existence of the arrangement was discovered, and how members of each group describe the benefits of the situation. The essay argues that this relationship is better described as an ‘inter-faith partnership’ rather than an ‘inter-faith dialogue’. Moreover, it is suggested that the relationship was successful largely due to this distinction. The discussion thus challenges the predominance of ‘dialogue’ as the primary model for conceiving interfaith relationships and engagements.",
keywords = "interfaith, Islam, Christianity, dialogue, ethnography, interreligious, Episcopal Church, Muslim, Christian",
author = "Brittain, {Christopher Craig}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1163/22144471-00302005",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "190--209",
journal = "Ecclesial Practices",
issn = "2214-4463",
publisher = "Brill Academic Publishers",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Partnership Not Dialogue

T2 - Lent and Ramadan under the Same Roof

AU - Brittain, Christopher Craig

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Since January 2011, members of a mosque in Aberdeen, Scotland have been meeting to pray in an Episcopal Church. Based on ethnographic research in both congregations, this paper explores the reasons each community entered into the relationship, the public reaction that erupted when the existence of the arrangement was discovered, and how members of each group describe the benefits of the situation. The essay argues that this relationship is better described as an ‘inter-faith partnership’ rather than an ‘inter-faith dialogue’. Moreover, it is suggested that the relationship was successful largely due to this distinction. The discussion thus challenges the predominance of ‘dialogue’ as the primary model for conceiving interfaith relationships and engagements.

AB - Since January 2011, members of a mosque in Aberdeen, Scotland have been meeting to pray in an Episcopal Church. Based on ethnographic research in both congregations, this paper explores the reasons each community entered into the relationship, the public reaction that erupted when the existence of the arrangement was discovered, and how members of each group describe the benefits of the situation. The essay argues that this relationship is better described as an ‘inter-faith partnership’ rather than an ‘inter-faith dialogue’. Moreover, it is suggested that the relationship was successful largely due to this distinction. The discussion thus challenges the predominance of ‘dialogue’ as the primary model for conceiving interfaith relationships and engagements.

KW - interfaith

KW - Islam

KW - Christianity

KW - dialogue

KW - ethnography

KW - interreligious

KW - Episcopal Church

KW - Muslim

KW - Christian

U2 - 10.1163/22144471-00302005

DO - 10.1163/22144471-00302005

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 190

EP - 209

JO - Ecclesial Practices

JF - Ecclesial Practices

SN - 2214-4463

IS - 2

ER -