Abstract
Party competition is an important mechanism for securing responsiveness and accountability in local government. Two measures of competition are identified and applied to all local party systems in England: dominance, which refers to the strength of the ruling party in the present; and volatility, which concerns changes in party strength in the past. The evidence shows that, on either measure, competition is strongest in the non-metropolitan counties and weakest in the London boroughs and metropolitan districts. By contrast, the two measures yield contradictory longitudinal results on the extent of competition: dominance has generally declined, but so has volatility. Thus conclusions on temporal trends in competition depend on the relative effects of dominance and volatility on local politicians' behaviour.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 129-142 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Policy and Politics |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 1997 |