Pathological nature of renal tumors - does size matter?

Lutfi Ali S. Kurban, Alireza Vosough, Preman Jacob, Deepak Prasad, Thomas Lam, Neil Scott, Bhaskar K. Somani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: We examined the relationship between the size and nature of renal masses in term of malignant potential, histological grading, pathological staging and presence of necrosis and sarcomatoid changes.
Materials and Methods: Retrospectively, we reviewed 323 consecutive nephrectomies between 2000 and 2010. Final pathology was correlated with tumour size. The renal tumours were stratified into three groups according to the largest diameter, defined as 4 cm or smaller, greater than 4 cm to 7 cm, and greater than 7 cm. We recorded the proportion of benign tumours, tumour grade and stage, presence of necrosis and sarcomatoid change.
Results: Small renal masses ≤4 cm (SRMs) were more likely to be localised to the kidney (90%) and of lower histological grade (75%). The proportion of benign tumours in SRMs (15%) was higher than other two groups with the majority of benign tumours being oncocytomas. There was a statistically significant trend with greater necrosis and sarcomatoid change for the large size group.
Conclusions: SRMs are likely to be low grade and organ confined with little or no adverse pathological features. There is increased likelihood of benignity in SRTs with the majority of benign tumours being oncocytomas.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)330-334
Number of pages5
JournalUrology Annals
Volume9
Issue number4
Early online date10 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Kidney
Neoplasms
Oxyphilic Adenoma
Necrosis
Nephrectomy
Pathology

Keywords

  • carcinoma
  • histology
  • kidney
  • neoplasm staging
  • nephrectomy
  • prognosis
  • renal cell
  • risk

Cite this

Kurban, L. A. S., Vosough, A., Jacob, P., Prasad, D., Lam, T., Scott, N., & Somani, B. K. (2017). Pathological nature of renal tumors - does size matter? Urology Annals, 9(4), 330-334. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_17_17

Pathological nature of renal tumors - does size matter? / Kurban, Lutfi Ali S.; Vosough, Alireza; Jacob, Preman; Prasad, Deepak; Lam, Thomas; Scott, Neil; Somani, Bhaskar K.

In: Urology Annals, Vol. 9, No. 4, 10.2017, p. 330-334.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kurban, LAS, Vosough, A, Jacob, P, Prasad, D, Lam, T, Scott, N & Somani, BK 2017, 'Pathological nature of renal tumors - does size matter?', Urology Annals, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 330-334. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_17_17
Kurban, Lutfi Ali S. ; Vosough, Alireza ; Jacob, Preman ; Prasad, Deepak ; Lam, Thomas ; Scott, Neil ; Somani, Bhaskar K. / Pathological nature of renal tumors - does size matter?. In: Urology Annals. 2017 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 330-334.
@article{048650a560da4c6f9438ad27d8265eca,
title = "Pathological nature of renal tumors - does size matter?",
abstract = "Introduction: We examined the relationship between the size and nature of renal masses in term of malignant potential, histological grading, pathological staging and presence of necrosis and sarcomatoid changes.Materials and Methods: Retrospectively, we reviewed 323 consecutive nephrectomies between 2000 and 2010. Final pathology was correlated with tumour size. The renal tumours were stratified into three groups according to the largest diameter, defined as 4 cm or smaller, greater than 4 cm to 7 cm, and greater than 7 cm. We recorded the proportion of benign tumours, tumour grade and stage, presence of necrosis and sarcomatoid change.Results: Small renal masses ≤4 cm (SRMs) were more likely to be localised to the kidney (90{\%}) and of lower histological grade (75{\%}). The proportion of benign tumours in SRMs (15{\%}) was higher than other two groups with the majority of benign tumours being oncocytomas. There was a statistically significant trend with greater necrosis and sarcomatoid change for the large size group.Conclusions: SRMs are likely to be low grade and organ confined with little or no adverse pathological features. There is increased likelihood of benignity in SRTs with the majority of benign tumours being oncocytomas.",
keywords = "carcinoma, histology, kidney, neoplasm staging, nephrectomy, prognosis, renal cell, risk",
author = "Kurban, {Lutfi Ali S.} and Alireza Vosough and Preman Jacob and Deepak Prasad and Thomas Lam and Neil Scott and Somani, {Bhaskar K.}",
note = "Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
doi = "10.4103/UA.UA_17_17",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "330--334",
journal = "Urology Annals",
issn = "0974-7834",
publisher = "Wolters Kluwer Espana, SA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pathological nature of renal tumors - does size matter?

AU - Kurban, Lutfi Ali S.

AU - Vosough, Alireza

AU - Jacob, Preman

AU - Prasad, Deepak

AU - Lam, Thomas

AU - Scott, Neil

AU - Somani, Bhaskar K.

N1 - Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Introduction: We examined the relationship between the size and nature of renal masses in term of malignant potential, histological grading, pathological staging and presence of necrosis and sarcomatoid changes.Materials and Methods: Retrospectively, we reviewed 323 consecutive nephrectomies between 2000 and 2010. Final pathology was correlated with tumour size. The renal tumours were stratified into three groups according to the largest diameter, defined as 4 cm or smaller, greater than 4 cm to 7 cm, and greater than 7 cm. We recorded the proportion of benign tumours, tumour grade and stage, presence of necrosis and sarcomatoid change.Results: Small renal masses ≤4 cm (SRMs) were more likely to be localised to the kidney (90%) and of lower histological grade (75%). The proportion of benign tumours in SRMs (15%) was higher than other two groups with the majority of benign tumours being oncocytomas. There was a statistically significant trend with greater necrosis and sarcomatoid change for the large size group.Conclusions: SRMs are likely to be low grade and organ confined with little or no adverse pathological features. There is increased likelihood of benignity in SRTs with the majority of benign tumours being oncocytomas.

AB - Introduction: We examined the relationship between the size and nature of renal masses in term of malignant potential, histological grading, pathological staging and presence of necrosis and sarcomatoid changes.Materials and Methods: Retrospectively, we reviewed 323 consecutive nephrectomies between 2000 and 2010. Final pathology was correlated with tumour size. The renal tumours were stratified into three groups according to the largest diameter, defined as 4 cm or smaller, greater than 4 cm to 7 cm, and greater than 7 cm. We recorded the proportion of benign tumours, tumour grade and stage, presence of necrosis and sarcomatoid change.Results: Small renal masses ≤4 cm (SRMs) were more likely to be localised to the kidney (90%) and of lower histological grade (75%). The proportion of benign tumours in SRMs (15%) was higher than other two groups with the majority of benign tumours being oncocytomas. There was a statistically significant trend with greater necrosis and sarcomatoid change for the large size group.Conclusions: SRMs are likely to be low grade and organ confined with little or no adverse pathological features. There is increased likelihood of benignity in SRTs with the majority of benign tumours being oncocytomas.

KW - carcinoma

KW - histology

KW - kidney

KW - neoplasm staging

KW - nephrectomy

KW - prognosis

KW - renal cell

KW - risk

U2 - 10.4103/UA.UA_17_17

DO - 10.4103/UA.UA_17_17

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 330

EP - 334

JO - Urology Annals

JF - Urology Annals

SN - 0974-7834

IS - 4

ER -