Patient preference in a randomized study comparing medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation

Premila Wencesiaus Ashok, Haitham Hamoda, G. M. M. Flett, Avril Kidd, Ann Elizabeth Fitzmaurice, Alexander Allan Templeton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess women's preferences and acceptability of medical (MA) and surgical abortion (SA) at 10-13 weeks gestation. This was a partially randomized patient preference trial. Women were offered to enter the randomized arm of the trial. Those who expressed a strong preference for a method were entered into the preference arm. A total of 368 women were randomized (188 medical and 180 surgical) while 77 entered the preference arm (15 medical and 62 surgical). Prior to abortion, 253 women (72%) indicated a preference for MA while 98 (28%) showed a preference for surgery (p<.0001). Despite having a preference for a particular method, women were content with alternatives. Women were more likely to choose the same abortion method again if they had shown a preference for that method prior to abortion (p=.002 and .01 for MA and SA, respectively). The availability of MA is an important option for many women who wish to avoid surgery or anesthesia and should now be offered routinely in the late first trimester. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-148
Number of pages5
JournalContraception
Volume71
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • medical abortion
  • surgical abortion
  • late first trimester
  • mifepristone
  • misoprostol
  • VACUUM ASPIRATION
  • CLINICAL-TRIALS
  • MIFEPRISTONE
  • MISOPROSTOL
  • TERMINATION
  • PREGNANCY
  • INDUCTION
  • IMPACT
  • ACCEPTABILITY
  • COMBINATION

Cite this

Patient preference in a randomized study comparing medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation. / Ashok, Premila Wencesiaus; Hamoda, Haitham; Flett, G. M. M.; Kidd, Avril; Fitzmaurice, Ann Elizabeth; Templeton, Alexander Allan.

In: Contraception, Vol. 71, 2005, p. 143-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e635f37459d041b18193c54c4ab65ccb,
title = "Patient preference in a randomized study comparing medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to assess women's preferences and acceptability of medical (MA) and surgical abortion (SA) at 10-13 weeks gestation. This was a partially randomized patient preference trial. Women were offered to enter the randomized arm of the trial. Those who expressed a strong preference for a method were entered into the preference arm. A total of 368 women were randomized (188 medical and 180 surgical) while 77 entered the preference arm (15 medical and 62 surgical). Prior to abortion, 253 women (72{\%}) indicated a preference for MA while 98 (28{\%}) showed a preference for surgery (p<.0001). Despite having a preference for a particular method, women were content with alternatives. Women were more likely to choose the same abortion method again if they had shown a preference for that method prior to abortion (p=.002 and .01 for MA and SA, respectively). The availability of MA is an important option for many women who wish to avoid surgery or anesthesia and should now be offered routinely in the late first trimester. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "medical abortion, surgical abortion, late first trimester, mifepristone, misoprostol, VACUUM ASPIRATION, CLINICAL-TRIALS, MIFEPRISTONE, MISOPROSTOL, TERMINATION, PREGNANCY, INDUCTION, IMPACT, ACCEPTABILITY, COMBINATION",
author = "Ashok, {Premila Wencesiaus} and Haitham Hamoda and Flett, {G. M. M.} and Avril Kidd and Fitzmaurice, {Ann Elizabeth} and Templeton, {Alexander Allan}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2004.08.013",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "143--148",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient preference in a randomized study comparing medical and surgical abortion at 10-13 weeks gestation

AU - Ashok, Premila Wencesiaus

AU - Hamoda, Haitham

AU - Flett, G. M. M.

AU - Kidd, Avril

AU - Fitzmaurice, Ann Elizabeth

AU - Templeton, Alexander Allan

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The aim of this study was to assess women's preferences and acceptability of medical (MA) and surgical abortion (SA) at 10-13 weeks gestation. This was a partially randomized patient preference trial. Women were offered to enter the randomized arm of the trial. Those who expressed a strong preference for a method were entered into the preference arm. A total of 368 women were randomized (188 medical and 180 surgical) while 77 entered the preference arm (15 medical and 62 surgical). Prior to abortion, 253 women (72%) indicated a preference for MA while 98 (28%) showed a preference for surgery (p<.0001). Despite having a preference for a particular method, women were content with alternatives. Women were more likely to choose the same abortion method again if they had shown a preference for that method prior to abortion (p=.002 and .01 for MA and SA, respectively). The availability of MA is an important option for many women who wish to avoid surgery or anesthesia and should now be offered routinely in the late first trimester. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

AB - The aim of this study was to assess women's preferences and acceptability of medical (MA) and surgical abortion (SA) at 10-13 weeks gestation. This was a partially randomized patient preference trial. Women were offered to enter the randomized arm of the trial. Those who expressed a strong preference for a method were entered into the preference arm. A total of 368 women were randomized (188 medical and 180 surgical) while 77 entered the preference arm (15 medical and 62 surgical). Prior to abortion, 253 women (72%) indicated a preference for MA while 98 (28%) showed a preference for surgery (p<.0001). Despite having a preference for a particular method, women were content with alternatives. Women were more likely to choose the same abortion method again if they had shown a preference for that method prior to abortion (p=.002 and .01 for MA and SA, respectively). The availability of MA is an important option for many women who wish to avoid surgery or anesthesia and should now be offered routinely in the late first trimester. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

KW - medical abortion

KW - surgical abortion

KW - late first trimester

KW - mifepristone

KW - misoprostol

KW - VACUUM ASPIRATION

KW - CLINICAL-TRIALS

KW - MIFEPRISTONE

KW - MISOPROSTOL

KW - TERMINATION

KW - PREGNANCY

KW - INDUCTION

KW - IMPACT

KW - ACCEPTABILITY

KW - COMBINATION

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.08.013

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.08.013

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 143

EP - 148

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

ER -