Patterns of participation in the formal and informal economies in the Commonwealth of Independent States

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The article investigates whether patterns of participation in the informal economy in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) is similar to that identified previously in a study of Central and Eastern Europe through analysis of a survey carried out in 2001 in eight CIS countries: Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia, and Georgia. We find that, as in the previous study, countries where economic development is higher show fewer households dependent upon the informal economy, while countries where development is slowest show more households dependent on the informal economy. While the domestic economy of household production was most important for the elderly and those in rural areas, the formal economy was most important for maintaining living standards. The cash economy added to the formal economy, on the other hand, was a source of wealth accumulation. Furthermore, the degree of urban and rural differentiation also helped to determine the extent to which households turned more toward informal or formal economies, which has implications for the trajectories of development in the different countries under consideration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-38
Number of pages27
JournalInternational Journal of Sociology
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Informal economy
Participation
Commonwealth of Independent States
Household
Kyrgyzstan
Central Europe
Standard of living
Country studies
Ukraine
Eastern Europe
Belarus
Russia
Kazakhstan
Household production
Trajectory
Rural areas
Economic development
Wealth accumulation
Cash
Armenia

Cite this

@article{37f73e4918ac433883b32be97b01a750,
title = "Patterns of participation in the formal and informal economies in the Commonwealth of Independent States",
abstract = "The article investigates whether patterns of participation in the informal economy in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) is similar to that identified previously in a study of Central and Eastern Europe through analysis of a survey carried out in 2001 in eight CIS countries: Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia, and Georgia. We find that, as in the previous study, countries where economic development is higher show fewer households dependent upon the informal economy, while countries where development is slowest show more households dependent on the informal economy. While the domestic economy of household production was most important for the elderly and those in rural areas, the formal economy was most important for maintaining living standards. The cash economy added to the formal economy, on the other hand, was a source of wealth accumulation. Furthermore, the degree of urban and rural differentiation also helped to determine the extent to which households turned more toward informal or formal economies, which has implications for the trajectories of development in the different countries under consideration.",
author = "Abbott, {Pamela Ann} and Claire Wallace",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.2753/IJS0020-7659390201",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "12--38",
journal = "International Journal of Sociology",
issn = "0020-7659",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns of participation in the formal and informal economies in the Commonwealth of Independent States

AU - Abbott, Pamela Ann

AU - Wallace, Claire

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The article investigates whether patterns of participation in the informal economy in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) is similar to that identified previously in a study of Central and Eastern Europe through analysis of a survey carried out in 2001 in eight CIS countries: Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia, and Georgia. We find that, as in the previous study, countries where economic development is higher show fewer households dependent upon the informal economy, while countries where development is slowest show more households dependent on the informal economy. While the domestic economy of household production was most important for the elderly and those in rural areas, the formal economy was most important for maintaining living standards. The cash economy added to the formal economy, on the other hand, was a source of wealth accumulation. Furthermore, the degree of urban and rural differentiation also helped to determine the extent to which households turned more toward informal or formal economies, which has implications for the trajectories of development in the different countries under consideration.

AB - The article investigates whether patterns of participation in the informal economy in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) is similar to that identified previously in a study of Central and Eastern Europe through analysis of a survey carried out in 2001 in eight CIS countries: Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia, and Georgia. We find that, as in the previous study, countries where economic development is higher show fewer households dependent upon the informal economy, while countries where development is slowest show more households dependent on the informal economy. While the domestic economy of household production was most important for the elderly and those in rural areas, the formal economy was most important for maintaining living standards. The cash economy added to the formal economy, on the other hand, was a source of wealth accumulation. Furthermore, the degree of urban and rural differentiation also helped to determine the extent to which households turned more toward informal or formal economies, which has implications for the trajectories of development in the different countries under consideration.

U2 - 10.2753/IJS0020-7659390201

DO - 10.2753/IJS0020-7659390201

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 12

EP - 38

JO - International Journal of Sociology

JF - International Journal of Sociology

SN - 0020-7659

IS - 2

ER -