Pedagogic discourse and sex education

myths, science and subversion

Gabrielle Mary Ivinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper elaborates possibilities and limitations for sex education in schools by mapping the consequence of introducing the topic 'sex' within a range of scientific and informal discursive settings. The organising and regulating structures of the school maintain the boundaries between common-sense and scientific discourses. Bernstein made a distinction between vertical discourse and horizontal discourses. Vertical discourses characterise scientific discourses that are coherent, explicit and systematically principled structures. Horizontal discourses characterise common-sense discourses that are local, segmented and context-dependent. The implications for teaching sex education through vertical discourses such as science, English and art as opposed to personal and social education, which is a horizontal discourse, are discussed. Yet, all discourses are unstable, and the notion of a 'tipping point' is introduced to demonstrate the potential for sex education when vertical discourses collapse.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-216
Number of pages16
JournalSex Education
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

sex education
subversion
pedagogics
myth
discourse
science
school
art

Cite this

Pedagogic discourse and sex education : myths, science and subversion. / Ivinson, Gabrielle Mary.

In: Sex Education, Vol. 7, No. 2, 05.2007, p. 201-216.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ivinson, Gabrielle Mary. / Pedagogic discourse and sex education : myths, science and subversion. In: Sex Education. 2007 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 201-216.
@article{ee75ee88f8a94fa9867f08b838471ff1,
title = "Pedagogic discourse and sex education: myths, science and subversion",
abstract = "This paper elaborates possibilities and limitations for sex education in schools by mapping the consequence of introducing the topic 'sex' within a range of scientific and informal discursive settings. The organising and regulating structures of the school maintain the boundaries between common-sense and scientific discourses. Bernstein made a distinction between vertical discourse and horizontal discourses. Vertical discourses characterise scientific discourses that are coherent, explicit and systematically principled structures. Horizontal discourses characterise common-sense discourses that are local, segmented and context-dependent. The implications for teaching sex education through vertical discourses such as science, English and art as opposed to personal and social education, which is a horizontal discourse, are discussed. Yet, all discourses are unstable, and the notion of a 'tipping point' is introduced to demonstrate the potential for sex education when vertical discourses collapse.",
author = "Ivinson, {Gabrielle Mary}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1080/14681810701264615",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "201--216",
journal = "Sex Education",
issn = "1468-1811",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pedagogic discourse and sex education

T2 - myths, science and subversion

AU - Ivinson, Gabrielle Mary

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - This paper elaborates possibilities and limitations for sex education in schools by mapping the consequence of introducing the topic 'sex' within a range of scientific and informal discursive settings. The organising and regulating structures of the school maintain the boundaries between common-sense and scientific discourses. Bernstein made a distinction between vertical discourse and horizontal discourses. Vertical discourses characterise scientific discourses that are coherent, explicit and systematically principled structures. Horizontal discourses characterise common-sense discourses that are local, segmented and context-dependent. The implications for teaching sex education through vertical discourses such as science, English and art as opposed to personal and social education, which is a horizontal discourse, are discussed. Yet, all discourses are unstable, and the notion of a 'tipping point' is introduced to demonstrate the potential for sex education when vertical discourses collapse.

AB - This paper elaborates possibilities and limitations for sex education in schools by mapping the consequence of introducing the topic 'sex' within a range of scientific and informal discursive settings. The organising and regulating structures of the school maintain the boundaries between common-sense and scientific discourses. Bernstein made a distinction between vertical discourse and horizontal discourses. Vertical discourses characterise scientific discourses that are coherent, explicit and systematically principled structures. Horizontal discourses characterise common-sense discourses that are local, segmented and context-dependent. The implications for teaching sex education through vertical discourses such as science, English and art as opposed to personal and social education, which is a horizontal discourse, are discussed. Yet, all discourses are unstable, and the notion of a 'tipping point' is introduced to demonstrate the potential for sex education when vertical discourses collapse.

U2 - 10.1080/14681810701264615

DO - 10.1080/14681810701264615

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 201

EP - 216

JO - Sex Education

JF - Sex Education

SN - 1468-1811

IS - 2

ER -