Perceived vulnerability to disease is positively related to the strength of preferences for apparent health in faces

Lisa Welling, C. A. Conway, Lisa Marie Debruine, Benedict Christopher Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

People who are particularly vulnerable to disease may reduce their likelihood of contracting illnesses during social interactions by having particularly strong aversions to individuals who appear ill. Consistent with this proposal, here we show that men and women who perceive themselves to be particularly vulnerable to disease have stronger preferences for apparent health in dynamic faces than individuals who perceive themselves to be relatively less vulnerable to disease. This relationship was independent of possible effects of general disgust sensitivity. Furthermore, perceived vulnerability to disease was not related to preferences for other facial cues that are attractive but do not necessarily signal an individual’s current health (i.e. perceiver-directed smiles). Our findings complement previous studies implicating perceived vulnerability to disease in attitudes to out-group individuals and those with physical abnormalities by implicating perceived vulnerability to disease as a factor in face preferences. Collectively, our findings reveal a relatively domain-specific association between perceived vulnerability to disease and the strength of aversions to facial cues associated with illness. Additionally, they are further evidence that variation in attractiveness judgments is not arbitrary, but rather reflects potentially adaptive individual differences in face preferences.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-139
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Evolutionary Psychology
Volume5
Issue number1-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

vulnerability
Disease
Health
health
complement
Cues
illness
outgroup
Interpersonal Relations
abnormality
social attraction
Individuality
interaction
evidence

Keywords

  • facial attractiveness
  • health
  • illness
  • disgust
  • vulnerability to disease
  • individual differences

Cite this

Perceived vulnerability to disease is positively related to the strength of preferences for apparent health in faces. / Welling, Lisa; Conway, C. A.; Debruine, Lisa Marie; Jones, Benedict Christopher.

In: Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, Vol. 5, No. 1-4, 03.2007, p. 131-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Welling, Lisa ; Conway, C. A. ; Debruine, Lisa Marie ; Jones, Benedict Christopher. / Perceived vulnerability to disease is positively related to the strength of preferences for apparent health in faces. In: Journal of Evolutionary Psychology. 2007 ; Vol. 5, No. 1-4. pp. 131-139.
@article{d3251a7b17b240aeaf9ff038eead0325,
title = "Perceived vulnerability to disease is positively related to the strength of preferences for apparent health in faces",
abstract = "People who are particularly vulnerable to disease may reduce their likelihood of contracting illnesses during social interactions by having particularly strong aversions to individuals who appear ill. Consistent with this proposal, here we show that men and women who perceive themselves to be particularly vulnerable to disease have stronger preferences for apparent health in dynamic faces than individuals who perceive themselves to be relatively less vulnerable to disease. This relationship was independent of possible effects of general disgust sensitivity. Furthermore, perceived vulnerability to disease was not related to preferences for other facial cues that are attractive but do not necessarily signal an individual’s current health (i.e. perceiver-directed smiles). Our findings complement previous studies implicating perceived vulnerability to disease in attitudes to out-group individuals and those with physical abnormalities by implicating perceived vulnerability to disease as a factor in face preferences. Collectively, our findings reveal a relatively domain-specific association between perceived vulnerability to disease and the strength of aversions to facial cues associated with illness. Additionally, they are further evidence that variation in attractiveness judgments is not arbitrary, but rather reflects potentially adaptive individual differences in face preferences.",
keywords = "facial attractiveness, health, illness, disgust, vulnerability to disease, individual differences",
author = "Lisa Welling and Conway, {C. A.} and Debruine, {Lisa Marie} and Jones, {Benedict Christopher}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1556/JEP.2007.1012",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "131--139",
journal = "Journal of Evolutionary Psychology",
issn = "1789-2082",
publisher = "Akademiai Kiado",
number = "1-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived vulnerability to disease is positively related to the strength of preferences for apparent health in faces

AU - Welling, Lisa

AU - Conway, C. A.

AU - Debruine, Lisa Marie

AU - Jones, Benedict Christopher

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - People who are particularly vulnerable to disease may reduce their likelihood of contracting illnesses during social interactions by having particularly strong aversions to individuals who appear ill. Consistent with this proposal, here we show that men and women who perceive themselves to be particularly vulnerable to disease have stronger preferences for apparent health in dynamic faces than individuals who perceive themselves to be relatively less vulnerable to disease. This relationship was independent of possible effects of general disgust sensitivity. Furthermore, perceived vulnerability to disease was not related to preferences for other facial cues that are attractive but do not necessarily signal an individual’s current health (i.e. perceiver-directed smiles). Our findings complement previous studies implicating perceived vulnerability to disease in attitudes to out-group individuals and those with physical abnormalities by implicating perceived vulnerability to disease as a factor in face preferences. Collectively, our findings reveal a relatively domain-specific association between perceived vulnerability to disease and the strength of aversions to facial cues associated with illness. Additionally, they are further evidence that variation in attractiveness judgments is not arbitrary, but rather reflects potentially adaptive individual differences in face preferences.

AB - People who are particularly vulnerable to disease may reduce their likelihood of contracting illnesses during social interactions by having particularly strong aversions to individuals who appear ill. Consistent with this proposal, here we show that men and women who perceive themselves to be particularly vulnerable to disease have stronger preferences for apparent health in dynamic faces than individuals who perceive themselves to be relatively less vulnerable to disease. This relationship was independent of possible effects of general disgust sensitivity. Furthermore, perceived vulnerability to disease was not related to preferences for other facial cues that are attractive but do not necessarily signal an individual’s current health (i.e. perceiver-directed smiles). Our findings complement previous studies implicating perceived vulnerability to disease in attitudes to out-group individuals and those with physical abnormalities by implicating perceived vulnerability to disease as a factor in face preferences. Collectively, our findings reveal a relatively domain-specific association between perceived vulnerability to disease and the strength of aversions to facial cues associated with illness. Additionally, they are further evidence that variation in attractiveness judgments is not arbitrary, but rather reflects potentially adaptive individual differences in face preferences.

KW - facial attractiveness

KW - health

KW - illness

KW - disgust

KW - vulnerability to disease

KW - individual differences

U2 - 10.1556/JEP.2007.1012

DO - 10.1556/JEP.2007.1012

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 131

EP - 139

JO - Journal of Evolutionary Psychology

JF - Journal of Evolutionary Psychology

SN - 1789-2082

IS - 1-4

ER -