Perceptions and costs of seal impacts on Atlantic salmon fisheries in the Moray Firth, Scotland

implications for the adaptive co-management of seal-fishery conflict

James R. A. Butler, Stuart J. Middlemas, Isla M. Graham, Robert N. Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Moray Firth Seal Management Plan (MFSMP) was introduced in Scotland in 2005 as a pilot for resolving conflict between Atlantic salmon fisheries and conservation imperatives for protected harbour and grey seals. This adaptive co-management model is now being applied nationally through the Marine (Scotland) Act (2010). However, no information exists on salmon fishery stakeholders' perceptions of seal predation impacts and related costs, which could influence the success of the MFSMP and other similar initiatives. In 2006 a questionnaire survey of the 95 salmon rod fisheries in seven major Moray Firth rivers was undertaken, and all 20 active salmon netting stations in the Firth. Forty-five fishery owners, 39 ghillies, 120 anglers and 11 netsmen (representing 17 netting stations) responded. The majority (81%) believed that seals had a significant or moderate impact on stocks and catches, 77% believed that all seals were responsible and 47% supported seal culling. Seals were sighted by 38% of rod fisheries, and 18% lost angler days from seal interference. Overall, 0.2% of total reported angler days were lost annually. The estimated direct cost of seal interference for responding rod fisheries was 14,960 pound annum(-1), and losses of catches and damage to nets was 16,500 pound annum(-1) for responding netsmen. Stakeholders' perceptions were largely inconsistent with their low direct costs and the aims of the MFSMP. Possible reasons for this are discussed, and implications for the governance of future adaptive co-management initiatives for seal-fishery conflict. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-323
Number of pages7
JournalMarine Policy
Volume35
Issue number3
Early online date10 Nov 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2011

Keywords

  • Atlantic salmon
  • adaptive co-management
  • grey seal
  • harbour seal
  • Livelihoods
  • special area of conservation
  • social-ecological systems
  • hatbor seals
  • Phoca-Vitulina
  • Northeast Scotland
  • management
  • abundance
  • conservation
  • predation
  • tourism
  • rivers

Cite this

Perceptions and costs of seal impacts on Atlantic salmon fisheries in the Moray Firth, Scotland : implications for the adaptive co-management of seal-fishery conflict. / Butler, James R. A.; Middlemas, Stuart J.; Graham, Isla M.; Harris, Robert N.

In: Marine Policy, Vol. 35, No. 3, 05.2011, p. 317-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bfa2365294cd4b92920b762b2da4df17,
title = "Perceptions and costs of seal impacts on Atlantic salmon fisheries in the Moray Firth, Scotland: implications for the adaptive co-management of seal-fishery conflict",
abstract = "The Moray Firth Seal Management Plan (MFSMP) was introduced in Scotland in 2005 as a pilot for resolving conflict between Atlantic salmon fisheries and conservation imperatives for protected harbour and grey seals. This adaptive co-management model is now being applied nationally through the Marine (Scotland) Act (2010). However, no information exists on salmon fishery stakeholders' perceptions of seal predation impacts and related costs, which could influence the success of the MFSMP and other similar initiatives. In 2006 a questionnaire survey of the 95 salmon rod fisheries in seven major Moray Firth rivers was undertaken, and all 20 active salmon netting stations in the Firth. Forty-five fishery owners, 39 ghillies, 120 anglers and 11 netsmen (representing 17 netting stations) responded. The majority (81{\%}) believed that seals had a significant or moderate impact on stocks and catches, 77{\%} believed that all seals were responsible and 47{\%} supported seal culling. Seals were sighted by 38{\%} of rod fisheries, and 18{\%} lost angler days from seal interference. Overall, 0.2{\%} of total reported angler days were lost annually. The estimated direct cost of seal interference for responding rod fisheries was 14,960 pound annum(-1), and losses of catches and damage to nets was 16,500 pound annum(-1) for responding netsmen. Stakeholders' perceptions were largely inconsistent with their low direct costs and the aims of the MFSMP. Possible reasons for this are discussed, and implications for the governance of future adaptive co-management initiatives for seal-fishery conflict. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Atlantic salmon, adaptive co-management, grey seal, harbour seal, Livelihoods, special area of conservation, social-ecological systems, hatbor seals, Phoca-Vitulina, Northeast Scotland, management, abundance, conservation, predation, tourism, rivers",
author = "Butler, {James R. A.} and Middlemas, {Stuart J.} and Graham, {Isla M.} and Harris, {Robert N.}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.marpol.2010.10.011",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "317--323",
journal = "Marine Policy",
issn = "0308-597X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions and costs of seal impacts on Atlantic salmon fisheries in the Moray Firth, Scotland

T2 - implications for the adaptive co-management of seal-fishery conflict

AU - Butler, James R. A.

AU - Middlemas, Stuart J.

AU - Graham, Isla M.

AU - Harris, Robert N.

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - The Moray Firth Seal Management Plan (MFSMP) was introduced in Scotland in 2005 as a pilot for resolving conflict between Atlantic salmon fisheries and conservation imperatives for protected harbour and grey seals. This adaptive co-management model is now being applied nationally through the Marine (Scotland) Act (2010). However, no information exists on salmon fishery stakeholders' perceptions of seal predation impacts and related costs, which could influence the success of the MFSMP and other similar initiatives. In 2006 a questionnaire survey of the 95 salmon rod fisheries in seven major Moray Firth rivers was undertaken, and all 20 active salmon netting stations in the Firth. Forty-five fishery owners, 39 ghillies, 120 anglers and 11 netsmen (representing 17 netting stations) responded. The majority (81%) believed that seals had a significant or moderate impact on stocks and catches, 77% believed that all seals were responsible and 47% supported seal culling. Seals were sighted by 38% of rod fisheries, and 18% lost angler days from seal interference. Overall, 0.2% of total reported angler days were lost annually. The estimated direct cost of seal interference for responding rod fisheries was 14,960 pound annum(-1), and losses of catches and damage to nets was 16,500 pound annum(-1) for responding netsmen. Stakeholders' perceptions were largely inconsistent with their low direct costs and the aims of the MFSMP. Possible reasons for this are discussed, and implications for the governance of future adaptive co-management initiatives for seal-fishery conflict. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - The Moray Firth Seal Management Plan (MFSMP) was introduced in Scotland in 2005 as a pilot for resolving conflict between Atlantic salmon fisheries and conservation imperatives for protected harbour and grey seals. This adaptive co-management model is now being applied nationally through the Marine (Scotland) Act (2010). However, no information exists on salmon fishery stakeholders' perceptions of seal predation impacts and related costs, which could influence the success of the MFSMP and other similar initiatives. In 2006 a questionnaire survey of the 95 salmon rod fisheries in seven major Moray Firth rivers was undertaken, and all 20 active salmon netting stations in the Firth. Forty-five fishery owners, 39 ghillies, 120 anglers and 11 netsmen (representing 17 netting stations) responded. The majority (81%) believed that seals had a significant or moderate impact on stocks and catches, 77% believed that all seals were responsible and 47% supported seal culling. Seals were sighted by 38% of rod fisheries, and 18% lost angler days from seal interference. Overall, 0.2% of total reported angler days were lost annually. The estimated direct cost of seal interference for responding rod fisheries was 14,960 pound annum(-1), and losses of catches and damage to nets was 16,500 pound annum(-1) for responding netsmen. Stakeholders' perceptions were largely inconsistent with their low direct costs and the aims of the MFSMP. Possible reasons for this are discussed, and implications for the governance of future adaptive co-management initiatives for seal-fishery conflict. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - Atlantic salmon

KW - adaptive co-management

KW - grey seal

KW - harbour seal

KW - Livelihoods

KW - special area of conservation

KW - social-ecological systems

KW - hatbor seals

KW - Phoca-Vitulina

KW - Northeast Scotland

KW - management

KW - abundance

KW - conservation

KW - predation

KW - tourism

KW - rivers

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.10.011

DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.10.011

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 317

EP - 323

JO - Marine Policy

JF - Marine Policy

SN - 0308-597X

IS - 3

ER -