Perineal pad test in evaluating outcome of treatments for female incontinence

a systematic review

D. Soroka, H. P. Drutz, C. M. A. Glazener, E. J. C. Hay-Smith, S. Ross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our objective was to systematically review clinical studies of incontinence treatments for women that used pad tests to assess outcome, to determine how closely the ICS guidelines had been followed. Our review (Medline 1988–2000, plus referenced studies) identified 75 relevant papers, carrying out pad tests in clinics (n= 53) or patients’ homes (n= 28). Clinic pad tests lasted between 60 seconds and 2 hours, with inconsistent starting bladder volumes, activities carried out, other test details and presentation of results. Home pad tests lasted between 1.5 and 48 hours: the conduct and reporting of these tests were also variable. Only 25 studies used pad tests that were apparently consistent with ICS guidelines. Pad tests are important in identifying urine loss in clinical evaluations; however, we found wide variations in their conduct and reporting. We recommend that the ICS should review the guidelines, and that further research should develop clinically valid pad tests. Authors and journal editors should ensure that pad test details are fully reported.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-175
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Urogynecology Journal
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2002

Fingerprint

Guidelines
Urinary Bladder
Urine
Research
Therapeutics
Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • clinical evaluation
  • female incontinence
  • outcome measurement
  • pad tests
  • systematic review

Cite this

Perineal pad test in evaluating outcome of treatments for female incontinence : a systematic review. / Soroka, D.; Drutz, H. P.; Glazener, C. M. A.; Hay-Smith, E. J. C.; Ross, S.

In: International Urogynecology Journal, Vol. 13, No. 3, 06.2002, p. 165-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Soroka, D. ; Drutz, H. P. ; Glazener, C. M. A. ; Hay-Smith, E. J. C. ; Ross, S. / Perineal pad test in evaluating outcome of treatments for female incontinence : a systematic review. In: International Urogynecology Journal. 2002 ; Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 165-175.
@article{870c6059e39d45729e139287c32e669d,
title = "Perineal pad test in evaluating outcome of treatments for female incontinence: a systematic review",
abstract = "Our objective was to systematically review clinical studies of incontinence treatments for women that used pad tests to assess outcome, to determine how closely the ICS guidelines had been followed. Our review (Medline 1988–2000, plus referenced studies) identified 75 relevant papers, carrying out pad tests in clinics (n= 53) or patients’ homes (n= 28). Clinic pad tests lasted between 60 seconds and 2 hours, with inconsistent starting bladder volumes, activities carried out, other test details and presentation of results. Home pad tests lasted between 1.5 and 48 hours: the conduct and reporting of these tests were also variable. Only 25 studies used pad tests that were apparently consistent with ICS guidelines. Pad tests are important in identifying urine loss in clinical evaluations; however, we found wide variations in their conduct and reporting. We recommend that the ICS should review the guidelines, and that further research should develop clinically valid pad tests. Authors and journal editors should ensure that pad test details are fully reported.",
keywords = "clinical evaluation, female incontinence, outcome measurement, pad tests, systematic review",
author = "D. Soroka and Drutz, {H. P.} and Glazener, {C. M. A.} and Hay-Smith, {E. J. C.} and S. Ross",
year = "2002",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s192-002-8348-z",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "165--175",
journal = "International Urogynecology Journal",
issn = "0937-3462",
publisher = "SPRINGER-VERLAG LONDON LTD",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perineal pad test in evaluating outcome of treatments for female incontinence

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Soroka, D.

AU - Drutz, H. P.

AU - Glazener, C. M. A.

AU - Hay-Smith, E. J. C.

AU - Ross, S.

PY - 2002/6

Y1 - 2002/6

N2 - Our objective was to systematically review clinical studies of incontinence treatments for women that used pad tests to assess outcome, to determine how closely the ICS guidelines had been followed. Our review (Medline 1988–2000, plus referenced studies) identified 75 relevant papers, carrying out pad tests in clinics (n= 53) or patients’ homes (n= 28). Clinic pad tests lasted between 60 seconds and 2 hours, with inconsistent starting bladder volumes, activities carried out, other test details and presentation of results. Home pad tests lasted between 1.5 and 48 hours: the conduct and reporting of these tests were also variable. Only 25 studies used pad tests that were apparently consistent with ICS guidelines. Pad tests are important in identifying urine loss in clinical evaluations; however, we found wide variations in their conduct and reporting. We recommend that the ICS should review the guidelines, and that further research should develop clinically valid pad tests. Authors and journal editors should ensure that pad test details are fully reported.

AB - Our objective was to systematically review clinical studies of incontinence treatments for women that used pad tests to assess outcome, to determine how closely the ICS guidelines had been followed. Our review (Medline 1988–2000, plus referenced studies) identified 75 relevant papers, carrying out pad tests in clinics (n= 53) or patients’ homes (n= 28). Clinic pad tests lasted between 60 seconds and 2 hours, with inconsistent starting bladder volumes, activities carried out, other test details and presentation of results. Home pad tests lasted between 1.5 and 48 hours: the conduct and reporting of these tests were also variable. Only 25 studies used pad tests that were apparently consistent with ICS guidelines. Pad tests are important in identifying urine loss in clinical evaluations; however, we found wide variations in their conduct and reporting. We recommend that the ICS should review the guidelines, and that further research should develop clinically valid pad tests. Authors and journal editors should ensure that pad test details are fully reported.

KW - clinical evaluation

KW - female incontinence

KW - outcome measurement

KW - pad tests

KW - systematic review

U2 - 10.1007/s192-002-8348-z

DO - 10.1007/s192-002-8348-z

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 165

EP - 175

JO - International Urogynecology Journal

JF - International Urogynecology Journal

SN - 0937-3462

IS - 3

ER -