Perirhinal cortex lesions in rats

Novelty detection and sensitivity to interference

Mathieu M Albasser, Cristian M Olarte-Sánchez, Eman Amin, Malcolm W Brown, Lisa Kinnavane, John P Aggleton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Rats with perirhinal cortex lesions received multiple object recognition trials within a continuous session to examine whether they show false memories. Experiment 1 focused on exploration patterns during the first object recognition test postsurgery, in which each trial contained 1 novel and 1 familiar object. The perirhinal cortex lesions reduced time spent exploring novel objects, but did not affect overall time spent exploring the test objects (novel plus familiar). Replications with subsequent cohorts of rats (Experiments 2, 3, 4.1) repeated this pattern of results. When all recognition memory data were combined (Experiments 1-4), giving totals of 44 perirhinal lesion rats and 40 surgical sham controls, the perirhinal cortex lesions caused a marginal reduction in total exploration time. That decrease in time with novel objects was often compensated by increased exploration of familiar objects. Experiment 4 also assessed the impact of proactive interference on recognition memory. Evidence emerged that prior object experience could additionally impair recognition performance in rats with perirhinal cortex lesions. Experiment 5 examined exploration levels when rats were just given pairs of novel objects to explore. Despite their perirhinal cortex lesions, exploration levels were comparable with those of control rats. While the results of Experiment 4 support the notion that perirhinal lesions can increase sensitivity to proactive interference, the overall findings question whether rats lacking a perirhinal cortex typically behave as if novel objects are familiar, that is, show false recognition. Rather, the rats retain a signal of novelty but struggle to discriminate the identity of that signal.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-243
Number of pages17
JournalBehavioral Neuroscience
Volume129
Issue number3
Early online dateJun 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Perirhinal Cortex
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • habituation
  • hippocampus
  • learning
  • perirhinal cortex
  • recognition memory

Cite this

Albasser, M. M., Olarte-Sánchez, C. M., Amin, E., Brown, M. W., Kinnavane, L., & Aggleton, J. P. (2015). Perirhinal cortex lesions in rats: Novelty detection and sensitivity to interference. Behavioral Neuroscience, 129(3), 227-243. https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000049

Perirhinal cortex lesions in rats : Novelty detection and sensitivity to interference. / Albasser, Mathieu M; Olarte-Sánchez, Cristian M; Amin, Eman; Brown, Malcolm W; Kinnavane, Lisa; Aggleton, John P.

In: Behavioral Neuroscience, Vol. 129, No. 3, 2015, p. 227-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Albasser, MM, Olarte-Sánchez, CM, Amin, E, Brown, MW, Kinnavane, L & Aggleton, JP 2015, 'Perirhinal cortex lesions in rats: Novelty detection and sensitivity to interference', Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 129, no. 3, pp. 227-243. https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000049
Albasser MM, Olarte-Sánchez CM, Amin E, Brown MW, Kinnavane L, Aggleton JP. Perirhinal cortex lesions in rats: Novelty detection and sensitivity to interference. Behavioral Neuroscience. 2015;129(3):227-243. https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000049
Albasser, Mathieu M ; Olarte-Sánchez, Cristian M ; Amin, Eman ; Brown, Malcolm W ; Kinnavane, Lisa ; Aggleton, John P. / Perirhinal cortex lesions in rats : Novelty detection and sensitivity to interference. In: Behavioral Neuroscience. 2015 ; Vol. 129, No. 3. pp. 227-243.
@article{6015a9a82efb4c54a412e535f2e5dced,
title = "Perirhinal cortex lesions in rats: Novelty detection and sensitivity to interference",
abstract = "Rats with perirhinal cortex lesions received multiple object recognition trials within a continuous session to examine whether they show false memories. Experiment 1 focused on exploration patterns during the first object recognition test postsurgery, in which each trial contained 1 novel and 1 familiar object. The perirhinal cortex lesions reduced time spent exploring novel objects, but did not affect overall time spent exploring the test objects (novel plus familiar). Replications with subsequent cohorts of rats (Experiments 2, 3, 4.1) repeated this pattern of results. When all recognition memory data were combined (Experiments 1-4), giving totals of 44 perirhinal lesion rats and 40 surgical sham controls, the perirhinal cortex lesions caused a marginal reduction in total exploration time. That decrease in time with novel objects was often compensated by increased exploration of familiar objects. Experiment 4 also assessed the impact of proactive interference on recognition memory. Evidence emerged that prior object experience could additionally impair recognition performance in rats with perirhinal cortex lesions. Experiment 5 examined exploration levels when rats were just given pairs of novel objects to explore. Despite their perirhinal cortex lesions, exploration levels were comparable with those of control rats. While the results of Experiment 4 support the notion that perirhinal lesions can increase sensitivity to proactive interference, the overall findings question whether rats lacking a perirhinal cortex typically behave as if novel objects are familiar, that is, show false recognition. Rather, the rats retain a signal of novelty but struggle to discriminate the identity of that signal.",
keywords = "habituation, hippocampus, learning, perirhinal cortex, recognition memory",
author = "Albasser, {Mathieu M} and Olarte-S{\'a}nchez, {Cristian M} and Eman Amin and Brown, {Malcolm W} and Lisa Kinnavane and Aggleton, {John P}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1037/bne0000049",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "227--243",
journal = "Behavioral Neuroscience",
issn = "0735-7044",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perirhinal cortex lesions in rats

T2 - Novelty detection and sensitivity to interference

AU - Albasser, Mathieu M

AU - Olarte-Sánchez, Cristian M

AU - Amin, Eman

AU - Brown, Malcolm W

AU - Kinnavane, Lisa

AU - Aggleton, John P

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Rats with perirhinal cortex lesions received multiple object recognition trials within a continuous session to examine whether they show false memories. Experiment 1 focused on exploration patterns during the first object recognition test postsurgery, in which each trial contained 1 novel and 1 familiar object. The perirhinal cortex lesions reduced time spent exploring novel objects, but did not affect overall time spent exploring the test objects (novel plus familiar). Replications with subsequent cohorts of rats (Experiments 2, 3, 4.1) repeated this pattern of results. When all recognition memory data were combined (Experiments 1-4), giving totals of 44 perirhinal lesion rats and 40 surgical sham controls, the perirhinal cortex lesions caused a marginal reduction in total exploration time. That decrease in time with novel objects was often compensated by increased exploration of familiar objects. Experiment 4 also assessed the impact of proactive interference on recognition memory. Evidence emerged that prior object experience could additionally impair recognition performance in rats with perirhinal cortex lesions. Experiment 5 examined exploration levels when rats were just given pairs of novel objects to explore. Despite their perirhinal cortex lesions, exploration levels were comparable with those of control rats. While the results of Experiment 4 support the notion that perirhinal lesions can increase sensitivity to proactive interference, the overall findings question whether rats lacking a perirhinal cortex typically behave as if novel objects are familiar, that is, show false recognition. Rather, the rats retain a signal of novelty but struggle to discriminate the identity of that signal.

AB - Rats with perirhinal cortex lesions received multiple object recognition trials within a continuous session to examine whether they show false memories. Experiment 1 focused on exploration patterns during the first object recognition test postsurgery, in which each trial contained 1 novel and 1 familiar object. The perirhinal cortex lesions reduced time spent exploring novel objects, but did not affect overall time spent exploring the test objects (novel plus familiar). Replications with subsequent cohorts of rats (Experiments 2, 3, 4.1) repeated this pattern of results. When all recognition memory data were combined (Experiments 1-4), giving totals of 44 perirhinal lesion rats and 40 surgical sham controls, the perirhinal cortex lesions caused a marginal reduction in total exploration time. That decrease in time with novel objects was often compensated by increased exploration of familiar objects. Experiment 4 also assessed the impact of proactive interference on recognition memory. Evidence emerged that prior object experience could additionally impair recognition performance in rats with perirhinal cortex lesions. Experiment 5 examined exploration levels when rats were just given pairs of novel objects to explore. Despite their perirhinal cortex lesions, exploration levels were comparable with those of control rats. While the results of Experiment 4 support the notion that perirhinal lesions can increase sensitivity to proactive interference, the overall findings question whether rats lacking a perirhinal cortex typically behave as if novel objects are familiar, that is, show false recognition. Rather, the rats retain a signal of novelty but struggle to discriminate the identity of that signal.

KW - habituation

KW - hippocampus

KW - learning

KW - perirhinal cortex

KW - recognition memory

U2 - 10.1037/bne0000049

DO - 10.1037/bne0000049

M3 - Article

VL - 129

SP - 227

EP - 243

JO - Behavioral Neuroscience

JF - Behavioral Neuroscience

SN - 0735-7044

IS - 3

ER -