TY - JOUR
T1 - Personal experiences of electronic measurement of medication adherence in elderly stroke survivors
AU - Chambers, Julie A.
AU - O’Carroll, Ronan E.
AU - Dennis, Martin
AU - Sudlow, Cathie
AU - Johnston, Marie
N1 - Acknowledgments
This project was funded by a grant from the Scottish Government, Department of Health, Chief Scientist Office, reference number CZH/4/569. We would like to thank the doctors and nurses at the Western General Hospital stroke clinic and ward for their help in recruitment, and the participants for giving up their time to take part.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to
declare.
Ethical standards
All participants gave informed consent for the
study which was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards
of the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (revised 2000).
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the practicality and accuracy of using an electronic monitoring device as a means of measuring medication adherence in elderly stroke survivors, with emphasis on patients’ experiences. Methods: The Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS), which records date and time of pill-bottle openings, was used to measure adherence to antihypertensive medication in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a brief psychological intervention with 58 stroke survivors. Patients were asked to describe and rate their experiences of using the MEMS pill bottle. Results: MEMS adherence was related to both pill count and self-reported adherence (Medication Adherence Report Scale). Most patients found the MEMS acceptable and easy to use, although some found it cumbersome and/or experienced difficulties with the cap. Nearly half (48 %) reported at least one instance where MEMS data did not reflect their pill-taking behavior (e.g. taking a tablet out the day before to take on a flight); 55 % of patients indicated that the MEMS helped them remember their medication, suggesting a mere measurement effect. Conclusion: Electronic pill monitoring has many flaws, including practical difficulties and data inaccuracies. There was evidence of a measurement effect, indicating that MEMS should be used in both intervention and control arms when used to measure adherence within RCTs. We also observed that the MEMS pill bottle is not suitable for measuring adherence in patients who use their own ‘days of the week’ box for sorting medication, as we found poorer adherence at follow-up in this group. Despite these limitations, we conclude that electronic monitoring presents the best method currently available for objective measurement of adherence, especially where detailed timing information is required. Accuracy may be improved by the concurrent use of other measures (e.g. pill count, self-report).
AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the practicality and accuracy of using an electronic monitoring device as a means of measuring medication adherence in elderly stroke survivors, with emphasis on patients’ experiences. Methods: The Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS), which records date and time of pill-bottle openings, was used to measure adherence to antihypertensive medication in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a brief psychological intervention with 58 stroke survivors. Patients were asked to describe and rate their experiences of using the MEMS pill bottle. Results: MEMS adherence was related to both pill count and self-reported adherence (Medication Adherence Report Scale). Most patients found the MEMS acceptable and easy to use, although some found it cumbersome and/or experienced difficulties with the cap. Nearly half (48 %) reported at least one instance where MEMS data did not reflect their pill-taking behavior (e.g. taking a tablet out the day before to take on a flight); 55 % of patients indicated that the MEMS helped them remember their medication, suggesting a mere measurement effect. Conclusion: Electronic pill monitoring has many flaws, including practical difficulties and data inaccuracies. There was evidence of a measurement effect, indicating that MEMS should be used in both intervention and control arms when used to measure adherence within RCTs. We also observed that the MEMS pill bottle is not suitable for measuring adherence in patients who use their own ‘days of the week’ box for sorting medication, as we found poorer adherence at follow-up in this group. Despite these limitations, we conclude that electronic monitoring presents the best method currently available for objective measurement of adherence, especially where detailed timing information is required. Accuracy may be improved by the concurrent use of other measures (e.g. pill count, self-report).
KW - Medication adherence
KW - Pill count
KW - Medication event monitoring system
KW - Medication adherence report scale
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928311984&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40267-015-0200-6
DO - 10.1007/s40267-015-0200-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84928311984
VL - 31
SP - 167
EP - 174
JO - Drugs and Therapy Perspectives
JF - Drugs and Therapy Perspectives
SN - 1172-0360
ER -