Physiological, perceptual and performance responses associated with self-selected versus standardized recovery periods during a repeated sprint protocol in elite youth football players

A preliminary study

Neil Gibson*, Callum Brownstein, Derek Ball, Craig Twist

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the physiological and perceptual responses of youth footballers to a repeated sprint protocol employing standardized and self-selected recovery. Methods: Eleven male participants (13.7 ± 1.1 years) performed a repeated sprint assessment comprising 10 × 30 m efforts. Employing a randomized crossover design, repeated sprints were performed using 30 s and self-selected recovery periods. Heart rate was monitored continuously with ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and lower body muscle power measured 2 min after the final sprint. The concentration of blood lactate was measured at 2, 5 and 7 min post sprinting. Magnitude of effects were reported using effect size (ES) statistics ± 90% confidence interval and percentage differences. Differences between trials were examined using paired student t tests (p < .05). Results: Self-selected recovery resulted in most likely shorter recovery times (57.7%; ES 1.55 ± 0.5; p < .01), a most likely increase in percentage decrement (65%; ES 0.36 ± 0.21; p = .12), very likely lower heart rate recovery (-58.9%; ES -1.10 ± 0.72; p = .05), and likely higher blood lactate concentration (p = .08-0.02). Differences in lower body power and RPE were unclear (p > .05). Conclusion: Self-selected recovery periods compromise repeated sprint performance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)186-193
Number of pages8
JournalPediatric Exercise Science
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017

Fingerprint

Football
Cross-Over Studies
Lactic Acid
Heart Rate
Confidence Intervals
Students
Muscles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{e1e1c7dc28e742dab7fb9d8fdee8b2a2,
title = "Physiological, perceptual and performance responses associated with self-selected versus standardized recovery periods during a repeated sprint protocol in elite youth football players: A preliminary study",
abstract = "Purpose: To examine the physiological and perceptual responses of youth footballers to a repeated sprint protocol employing standardized and self-selected recovery. Methods: Eleven male participants (13.7 ± 1.1 years) performed a repeated sprint assessment comprising 10 × 30 m efforts. Employing a randomized crossover design, repeated sprints were performed using 30 s and self-selected recovery periods. Heart rate was monitored continuously with ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and lower body muscle power measured 2 min after the final sprint. The concentration of blood lactate was measured at 2, 5 and 7 min post sprinting. Magnitude of effects were reported using effect size (ES) statistics ± 90{\%} confidence interval and percentage differences. Differences between trials were examined using paired student t tests (p < .05). Results: Self-selected recovery resulted in most likely shorter recovery times (57.7{\%}; ES 1.55 ± 0.5; p < .01), a most likely increase in percentage decrement (65{\%}; ES 0.36 ± 0.21; p = .12), very likely lower heart rate recovery (-58.9{\%}; ES -1.10 ± 0.72; p = .05), and likely higher blood lactate concentration (p = .08-0.02). Differences in lower body power and RPE were unclear (p > .05). Conclusion: Self-selected recovery periods compromise repeated sprint performance.",
author = "Neil Gibson and Callum Brownstein and Derek Ball and Craig Twist",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1123/pes.2016-0130",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "186--193",
journal = "Pediatric Exercise Science",
issn = "0899-8493",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physiological, perceptual and performance responses associated with self-selected versus standardized recovery periods during a repeated sprint protocol in elite youth football players

T2 - A preliminary study

AU - Gibson, Neil

AU - Brownstein, Callum

AU - Ball, Derek

AU - Twist, Craig

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Purpose: To examine the physiological and perceptual responses of youth footballers to a repeated sprint protocol employing standardized and self-selected recovery. Methods: Eleven male participants (13.7 ± 1.1 years) performed a repeated sprint assessment comprising 10 × 30 m efforts. Employing a randomized crossover design, repeated sprints were performed using 30 s and self-selected recovery periods. Heart rate was monitored continuously with ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and lower body muscle power measured 2 min after the final sprint. The concentration of blood lactate was measured at 2, 5 and 7 min post sprinting. Magnitude of effects were reported using effect size (ES) statistics ± 90% confidence interval and percentage differences. Differences between trials were examined using paired student t tests (p < .05). Results: Self-selected recovery resulted in most likely shorter recovery times (57.7%; ES 1.55 ± 0.5; p < .01), a most likely increase in percentage decrement (65%; ES 0.36 ± 0.21; p = .12), very likely lower heart rate recovery (-58.9%; ES -1.10 ± 0.72; p = .05), and likely higher blood lactate concentration (p = .08-0.02). Differences in lower body power and RPE were unclear (p > .05). Conclusion: Self-selected recovery periods compromise repeated sprint performance.

AB - Purpose: To examine the physiological and perceptual responses of youth footballers to a repeated sprint protocol employing standardized and self-selected recovery. Methods: Eleven male participants (13.7 ± 1.1 years) performed a repeated sprint assessment comprising 10 × 30 m efforts. Employing a randomized crossover design, repeated sprints were performed using 30 s and self-selected recovery periods. Heart rate was monitored continuously with ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and lower body muscle power measured 2 min after the final sprint. The concentration of blood lactate was measured at 2, 5 and 7 min post sprinting. Magnitude of effects were reported using effect size (ES) statistics ± 90% confidence interval and percentage differences. Differences between trials were examined using paired student t tests (p < .05). Results: Self-selected recovery resulted in most likely shorter recovery times (57.7%; ES 1.55 ± 0.5; p < .01), a most likely increase in percentage decrement (65%; ES 0.36 ± 0.21; p = .12), very likely lower heart rate recovery (-58.9%; ES -1.10 ± 0.72; p = .05), and likely higher blood lactate concentration (p = .08-0.02). Differences in lower body power and RPE were unclear (p > .05). Conclusion: Self-selected recovery periods compromise repeated sprint performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018354061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/pes.2016-0130

DO - 10.1123/pes.2016-0130

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 186

EP - 193

JO - Pediatric Exercise Science

JF - Pediatric Exercise Science

SN - 0899-8493

IS - 2

ER -