Police Officer and Civilian Staff Receptivity to Research and Evidence-Based Policing in the UK: Providing a Contextual Understanding through Qualitative Interviews

Karen Lumsden*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper provides a contextual understanding of police officer and civilian staff receptivity to research and evidence-based policing (EBP) in UK through presentation of findings from qualitative interviews. It focuses on: 1) how officers defined the concept of EBP; 2) the context driving these definitions (including political pressures, professionalization, and the rise of police-academic collaborations); 3) what research means to police officers in terms of 'hierarchies' and a 'ladder of evidence'; and 4) how success and 'what works' is measured (including academic versus practitioner definitions). It is argued that future studies of police officer and civilian staff receptivity to research and EBP are crucial as receptivity influences the application of research and willingness to incorporate an evidence-base into policing practice. Data are presented from 15 semi-structured interviews with police officers and civilian staff from police forces in the UK.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-167
Number of pages11
JournalPolicing-A journal of policy and practice
Volume11
Issue number2
Early online date2 Sept 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

Keywords

  • evidence-base
  • partnerships
  • policing
  • impact

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Police Officer and Civilian Staff Receptivity to Research and Evidence-Based Policing in the UK: Providing a Contextual Understanding through Qualitative Interviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this