Police reform in Thailand post-2006

Krisanaphong Poothakool, Tony Glendinning (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The study analyses the operation and culture of Thai policing and the intersection between policing and politics framed by the recommendations of the Police Reform Committee (PRC), 2006—2007. The PRC’s priorities were: devolving police administration, especially budgets and personnel management; increasing accountability, especially establishing an Independent Complaints’ Committee; and civilianization. Those priorities were seen as clearing the ground for development of community-oriented policing longer-term. Interviews were conducted with senior members of the PRC. Afterwards non-commissioned officers’ opinions were established through a countrywide survey and follow-up in-depth interviews. Their station chiefs were also interviewed. According to PRC members and serving officers’ accounts the barriers to reform of police administration were political interference and nepotism, especially corruption of appointments, nominations, promotions and transfers. Local policing often involved further interference by informal networks of officials, politicians and business. The PRC’s recommendations were shelved due to an unfavourable political climate. The paradox was the PRC’s strategies for ‘democratic’ police reform were well-informed and well-founded but its establishment had been politically motivated and it was not immune to interference by competing political factions. The study contributes to debates about moving away from authoritarian policing models in the developing world by analysing barriers to the reform of police administration in the Thai context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)371-384
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Criminology and Sociology
Volume2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Thailand
police
reform
interference
personnel management
faction
interview
complaint
corruption
politician
budget
promotion
climate
responsibility
politics
community

Keywords

  • Royal Thai Police
  • police reform
  • devolved management
  • police accountability
  • community-oriented

Cite this

Police reform in Thailand post-2006. / Poothakool, Krisanaphong; Glendinning, Tony (Corresponding Author).

In: International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, Vol. 2, 09.2013, p. 371-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Poothakool, Krisanaphong ; Glendinning, Tony. / Police reform in Thailand post-2006. In: International Journal of Criminology and Sociology. 2013 ; Vol. 2. pp. 371-384.
@article{40a8e65965b14fcdad3ce0633b6b8092,
title = "Police reform in Thailand post-2006",
abstract = "The study analyses the operation and culture of Thai policing and the intersection between policing and politics framed by the recommendations of the Police Reform Committee (PRC), 2006—2007. The PRC’s priorities were: devolving police administration, especially budgets and personnel management; increasing accountability, especially establishing an Independent Complaints’ Committee; and civilianization. Those priorities were seen as clearing the ground for development of community-oriented policing longer-term. Interviews were conducted with senior members of the PRC. Afterwards non-commissioned officers’ opinions were established through a countrywide survey and follow-up in-depth interviews. Their station chiefs were also interviewed. According to PRC members and serving officers’ accounts the barriers to reform of police administration were political interference and nepotism, especially corruption of appointments, nominations, promotions and transfers. Local policing often involved further interference by informal networks of officials, politicians and business. The PRC’s recommendations were shelved due to an unfavourable political climate. The paradox was the PRC’s strategies for ‘democratic’ police reform were well-informed and well-founded but its establishment had been politically motivated and it was not immune to interference by competing political factions. The study contributes to debates about moving away from authoritarian policing models in the developing world by analysing barriers to the reform of police administration in the Thai context.",
keywords = "Royal Thai Police, police reform , devolved management, police accountability, community-oriented",
author = "Krisanaphong Poothakool and Tony Glendinning",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.6000/1929-4409.2013.02.35",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "371--384",
journal = "International Journal of Criminology and Sociology",
issn = "1929-4409",
publisher = "Lifescience Global",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Police reform in Thailand post-2006

AU - Poothakool, Krisanaphong

AU - Glendinning, Tony

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - The study analyses the operation and culture of Thai policing and the intersection between policing and politics framed by the recommendations of the Police Reform Committee (PRC), 2006—2007. The PRC’s priorities were: devolving police administration, especially budgets and personnel management; increasing accountability, especially establishing an Independent Complaints’ Committee; and civilianization. Those priorities were seen as clearing the ground for development of community-oriented policing longer-term. Interviews were conducted with senior members of the PRC. Afterwards non-commissioned officers’ opinions were established through a countrywide survey and follow-up in-depth interviews. Their station chiefs were also interviewed. According to PRC members and serving officers’ accounts the barriers to reform of police administration were political interference and nepotism, especially corruption of appointments, nominations, promotions and transfers. Local policing often involved further interference by informal networks of officials, politicians and business. The PRC’s recommendations were shelved due to an unfavourable political climate. The paradox was the PRC’s strategies for ‘democratic’ police reform were well-informed and well-founded but its establishment had been politically motivated and it was not immune to interference by competing political factions. The study contributes to debates about moving away from authoritarian policing models in the developing world by analysing barriers to the reform of police administration in the Thai context.

AB - The study analyses the operation and culture of Thai policing and the intersection between policing and politics framed by the recommendations of the Police Reform Committee (PRC), 2006—2007. The PRC’s priorities were: devolving police administration, especially budgets and personnel management; increasing accountability, especially establishing an Independent Complaints’ Committee; and civilianization. Those priorities were seen as clearing the ground for development of community-oriented policing longer-term. Interviews were conducted with senior members of the PRC. Afterwards non-commissioned officers’ opinions were established through a countrywide survey and follow-up in-depth interviews. Their station chiefs were also interviewed. According to PRC members and serving officers’ accounts the barriers to reform of police administration were political interference and nepotism, especially corruption of appointments, nominations, promotions and transfers. Local policing often involved further interference by informal networks of officials, politicians and business. The PRC’s recommendations were shelved due to an unfavourable political climate. The paradox was the PRC’s strategies for ‘democratic’ police reform were well-informed and well-founded but its establishment had been politically motivated and it was not immune to interference by competing political factions. The study contributes to debates about moving away from authoritarian policing models in the developing world by analysing barriers to the reform of police administration in the Thai context.

KW - Royal Thai Police

KW - police reform

KW - devolved management

KW - police accountability

KW - community-oriented

U2 - 10.6000/1929-4409.2013.02.35

DO - 10.6000/1929-4409.2013.02.35

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 371

EP - 384

JO - International Journal of Criminology and Sociology

JF - International Journal of Criminology and Sociology

SN - 1929-4409

ER -