Policy without Learning

Double Devolution and the Abuse of the Deliberative Idea

Alexander Grant Jordan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article asserts that the current ‘Double Devolution’ idea in the UK is part of a wider fashion in political architecture that generally sees the emergence of larger units. Simultaneously though there is a political need for gestures to smaller scale units and more deliberative procedures. The article argues that the Double Devolution concept simply ignores a rising volume of evidence that finds problems in operationalizing small-scale and deliberative ideas. Among other problems is the consequence that the resulting increased policy diversity is quickly labelled a ‘postcode lottery’. The article also reviews the deliberative literature to find serious questions raised about new biases that emerge in deliberative settings. Finally, the article adopts Hood’s work on cultural theory and public management to say that in fact evidence-based policy making may not be the norm - but policy selections reflect values and normative preferences.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)48-73
Number of pages26
JournalPublic Policy and Administration
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

decentralization
abuse
cultural theory
public management
learning
evidence
trend
Values
literature

Keywords

  • cultural theory
  • deliberation
  • democracy
  • diversity
  • Double Devolution
  • operationalization

Cite this

Policy without Learning : Double Devolution and the Abuse of the Deliberative Idea. / Jordan, Alexander Grant.

In: Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 48-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{830add03351b4e669e35cfa5a340f319,
title = "Policy without Learning: Double Devolution and the Abuse of the Deliberative Idea",
abstract = "This article asserts that the current ‘Double Devolution’ idea in the UK is part of a wider fashion in political architecture that generally sees the emergence of larger units. Simultaneously though there is a political need for gestures to smaller scale units and more deliberative procedures. The article argues that the Double Devolution concept simply ignores a rising volume of evidence that finds problems in operationalizing small-scale and deliberative ideas. Among other problems is the consequence that the resulting increased policy diversity is quickly labelled a ‘postcode lottery’. The article also reviews the deliberative literature to find serious questions raised about new biases that emerge in deliberative settings. Finally, the article adopts Hood’s work on cultural theory and public management to say that in fact evidence-based policy making may not be the norm - but policy selections reflect values and normative preferences.",
keywords = "cultural theory, deliberation, democracy, diversity, Double Devolution, operationalization",
author = "Jordan, {Alexander Grant}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0952076707071504",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "48--73",
journal = "Public Policy and Administration",
issn = "0952-0767",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policy without Learning

T2 - Double Devolution and the Abuse of the Deliberative Idea

AU - Jordan, Alexander Grant

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - This article asserts that the current ‘Double Devolution’ idea in the UK is part of a wider fashion in political architecture that generally sees the emergence of larger units. Simultaneously though there is a political need for gestures to smaller scale units and more deliberative procedures. The article argues that the Double Devolution concept simply ignores a rising volume of evidence that finds problems in operationalizing small-scale and deliberative ideas. Among other problems is the consequence that the resulting increased policy diversity is quickly labelled a ‘postcode lottery’. The article also reviews the deliberative literature to find serious questions raised about new biases that emerge in deliberative settings. Finally, the article adopts Hood’s work on cultural theory and public management to say that in fact evidence-based policy making may not be the norm - but policy selections reflect values and normative preferences.

AB - This article asserts that the current ‘Double Devolution’ idea in the UK is part of a wider fashion in political architecture that generally sees the emergence of larger units. Simultaneously though there is a political need for gestures to smaller scale units and more deliberative procedures. The article argues that the Double Devolution concept simply ignores a rising volume of evidence that finds problems in operationalizing small-scale and deliberative ideas. Among other problems is the consequence that the resulting increased policy diversity is quickly labelled a ‘postcode lottery’. The article also reviews the deliberative literature to find serious questions raised about new biases that emerge in deliberative settings. Finally, the article adopts Hood’s work on cultural theory and public management to say that in fact evidence-based policy making may not be the norm - but policy selections reflect values and normative preferences.

KW - cultural theory

KW - deliberation

KW - democracy

KW - diversity

KW - Double Devolution

KW - operationalization

U2 - 10.1177/0952076707071504

DO - 10.1177/0952076707071504

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 48

EP - 73

JO - Public Policy and Administration

JF - Public Policy and Administration

SN - 0952-0767

IS - 1

ER -