Populist parties in Europe: agents of discontent?

Anders Widfeldt*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

Abstract

In this book, van Kessel seeks to explain the electoral performances of populist parties with a two-step approach. First, a fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) across 31 European countries; second, in-depth case studies of the Netherlands, Poland and Great Britain. The key independent variables, or ‘fundamental conditions’ (23–8), are the proportionality of the electoral system, the responsiveness of the established parties and the credibility of the populist parties themselves. In addition, the saliency of four issue areas is considered, namely ethnicity and culture, economic hardship, European integration and corruption. The fsQCA approach allows the setting of ‘membership scores’ continuously between 0 and 1, in contrast to the rigidly dichotomous ‘crisp set’ QCA approach. The qualitative nature of these scores is potentially problematical, but the author has consulted country experts and difficult choices are explained in the text
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)907-908
Number of pages2
JournalWest European Politics
Volume39
Issue number4
Early online date4 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016

Cite this

Populist parties in Europe : agents of discontent? / Widfeldt, Anders.

In: West European Politics, Vol. 39, No. 4, 07.2016, p. 907-908.

Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

@article{933d5d762e964c2fb606d5d5dd7a787d,
title = "Populist parties in Europe: agents of discontent?",
abstract = "In this book, van Kessel seeks to explain the electoral performances of populist parties with a two-step approach. First, a fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) across 31 European countries; second, in-depth case studies of the Netherlands, Poland and Great Britain. The key independent variables, or ‘fundamental conditions’ (23–8), are the proportionality of the electoral system, the responsiveness of the established parties and the credibility of the populist parties themselves. In addition, the saliency of four issue areas is considered, namely ethnicity and culture, economic hardship, European integration and corruption. The fsQCA approach allows the setting of ‘membership scores’ continuously between 0 and 1, in contrast to the rigidly dichotomous ‘crisp set’ QCA approach. The qualitative nature of these scores is potentially problematical, but the author has consulted country experts and difficult choices are explained in the text",
author = "Anders Widfeldt",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/01402382.2016.1166737",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "907--908",
journal = "West European Politics",
issn = "0140-2382",
publisher = "ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Populist parties in Europe

T2 - agents of discontent?

AU - Widfeldt, Anders

PY - 2016/7

Y1 - 2016/7

N2 - In this book, van Kessel seeks to explain the electoral performances of populist parties with a two-step approach. First, a fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) across 31 European countries; second, in-depth case studies of the Netherlands, Poland and Great Britain. The key independent variables, or ‘fundamental conditions’ (23–8), are the proportionality of the electoral system, the responsiveness of the established parties and the credibility of the populist parties themselves. In addition, the saliency of four issue areas is considered, namely ethnicity and culture, economic hardship, European integration and corruption. The fsQCA approach allows the setting of ‘membership scores’ continuously between 0 and 1, in contrast to the rigidly dichotomous ‘crisp set’ QCA approach. The qualitative nature of these scores is potentially problematical, but the author has consulted country experts and difficult choices are explained in the text

AB - In this book, van Kessel seeks to explain the electoral performances of populist parties with a two-step approach. First, a fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) across 31 European countries; second, in-depth case studies of the Netherlands, Poland and Great Britain. The key independent variables, or ‘fundamental conditions’ (23–8), are the proportionality of the electoral system, the responsiveness of the established parties and the credibility of the populist parties themselves. In addition, the saliency of four issue areas is considered, namely ethnicity and culture, economic hardship, European integration and corruption. The fsQCA approach allows the setting of ‘membership scores’ continuously between 0 and 1, in contrast to the rigidly dichotomous ‘crisp set’ QCA approach. The qualitative nature of these scores is potentially problematical, but the author has consulted country experts and difficult choices are explained in the text

U2 - 10.1080/01402382.2016.1166737

DO - 10.1080/01402382.2016.1166737

M3 - Book/Film/Article review

VL - 39

SP - 907

EP - 908

JO - West European Politics

JF - West European Politics

SN - 0140-2382

IS - 4

ER -