Post-structuralism and Policy Research in Education

Walter Malcolm Humes, T. Bryce

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    22 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper critically examines some of the challenges to policy research in education posed by post-modemist and post-structuralist thinking. It starts by characterizing those modernist and structuralist assumptions which have been subject to attack, but suggests that they arc still very much in the ascendancy in the official discourse of educational research (as expressed, for example, by the National Educational Research Forum). Thereafter, key features of the assault represented by the work of Foucault, Derrida and Lyotard are outlined and an account of their destabilizing effect on intellectual work, for individuals and institutions, is offered. Several possible responses are considered. It is argued that policy research poses particular problems because, notwithstanding the messiness of the policy process, there must always come a point of closure on options: decisions cannot be delayed until the epistemological status of educational research is resolved. Researchers must find ways of negotiating the shifting configurations in the relationship between research, policy and practice. This will require both theoretical sophistication and robust engagement with issues that matter to practitioners.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)175-187
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Education Policy
    Volume18
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Cite this

    Post-structuralism and Policy Research in Education. / Humes, Walter Malcolm; Bryce, T.

    In: Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2003, p. 175-187.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Humes, Walter Malcolm ; Bryce, T. / Post-structuralism and Policy Research in Education. In: Journal of Education Policy. 2003 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 175-187.
    @article{f5ae32a592a2464ca750006c26d53538,
    title = "Post-structuralism and Policy Research in Education",
    abstract = "This paper critically examines some of the challenges to policy research in education posed by post-modemist and post-structuralist thinking. It starts by characterizing those modernist and structuralist assumptions which have been subject to attack, but suggests that they arc still very much in the ascendancy in the official discourse of educational research (as expressed, for example, by the National Educational Research Forum). Thereafter, key features of the assault represented by the work of Foucault, Derrida and Lyotard are outlined and an account of their destabilizing effect on intellectual work, for individuals and institutions, is offered. Several possible responses are considered. It is argued that policy research poses particular problems because, notwithstanding the messiness of the policy process, there must always come a point of closure on options: decisions cannot be delayed until the epistemological status of educational research is resolved. Researchers must find ways of negotiating the shifting configurations in the relationship between research, policy and practice. This will require both theoretical sophistication and robust engagement with issues that matter to practitioners.",
    author = "Humes, {Walter Malcolm} and T. Bryce",
    year = "2003",
    doi = "10.1080/0268093022000043056",
    language = "English",
    volume = "18",
    pages = "175--187",
    journal = "Journal of Education Policy",
    issn = "0268-0939",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Post-structuralism and Policy Research in Education

    AU - Humes, Walter Malcolm

    AU - Bryce, T.

    PY - 2003

    Y1 - 2003

    N2 - This paper critically examines some of the challenges to policy research in education posed by post-modemist and post-structuralist thinking. It starts by characterizing those modernist and structuralist assumptions which have been subject to attack, but suggests that they arc still very much in the ascendancy in the official discourse of educational research (as expressed, for example, by the National Educational Research Forum). Thereafter, key features of the assault represented by the work of Foucault, Derrida and Lyotard are outlined and an account of their destabilizing effect on intellectual work, for individuals and institutions, is offered. Several possible responses are considered. It is argued that policy research poses particular problems because, notwithstanding the messiness of the policy process, there must always come a point of closure on options: decisions cannot be delayed until the epistemological status of educational research is resolved. Researchers must find ways of negotiating the shifting configurations in the relationship between research, policy and practice. This will require both theoretical sophistication and robust engagement with issues that matter to practitioners.

    AB - This paper critically examines some of the challenges to policy research in education posed by post-modemist and post-structuralist thinking. It starts by characterizing those modernist and structuralist assumptions which have been subject to attack, but suggests that they arc still very much in the ascendancy in the official discourse of educational research (as expressed, for example, by the National Educational Research Forum). Thereafter, key features of the assault represented by the work of Foucault, Derrida and Lyotard are outlined and an account of their destabilizing effect on intellectual work, for individuals and institutions, is offered. Several possible responses are considered. It is argued that policy research poses particular problems because, notwithstanding the messiness of the policy process, there must always come a point of closure on options: decisions cannot be delayed until the epistemological status of educational research is resolved. Researchers must find ways of negotiating the shifting configurations in the relationship between research, policy and practice. This will require both theoretical sophistication and robust engagement with issues that matter to practitioners.

    U2 - 10.1080/0268093022000043056

    DO - 10.1080/0268093022000043056

    M3 - Article

    VL - 18

    SP - 175

    EP - 187

    JO - Journal of Education Policy

    JF - Journal of Education Policy

    SN - 0268-0939

    IS - 2

    ER -