Pragmatic research tales: The ELEVATE study as an illustration of the issues involved in implementing pragmatic research

Annie Blyth*, Stan Musgrave, David Price, Ian Harvey

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Despite increased asthma preventative treatment there is evidence that large numbers of patients continue to suffer significant symptoms and lifestyle limitation. Possible reasons include lack of disease recognition, poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids and inability of inhaled steroids to fully control asthma. As earlier studies have been short term, and far from "real-life", the NHS' National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment sought a study to look at both the short and long term impact on quality of life, clinical status and resource utilisation of using leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs). ELEVATE was conceived in response to this need and the GPIAG was successful in winning this research bid in conjunction with the University of East Anglia. Study objectives and design: The study's objective is to compare quality of life comparing LTRAs with alternative therapies at steps 2 & 3 of the National Asthma Guidelines for 720 adult patients. The study is a pragmatic randomised controlled trial over 2 years that will provide information about broadly generalisable patients in "real world" general practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95
Number of pages1
JournalPrimary Care Respiratory Journal
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2003

Fingerprint

Leukotriene Antagonists
Asthma
Research
Quality of Life
Biomedical Technology Assessment
Complementary Therapies
General Practice
Life Style
Adrenal Cortex Hormones
Randomized Controlled Trials
Steroids
Guidelines
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Pragmatic research tales : The ELEVATE study as an illustration of the issues involved in implementing pragmatic research. / Blyth, Annie; Musgrave, Stan; Price, David; Harvey, Ian.

In: Primary Care Respiratory Journal, Vol. 12, No. 3, 09.2003, p. 95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5912048751eb44e78760434b4e4a79f6,
title = "Pragmatic research tales: The ELEVATE study as an illustration of the issues involved in implementing pragmatic research",
abstract = "Background: Despite increased asthma preventative treatment there is evidence that large numbers of patients continue to suffer significant symptoms and lifestyle limitation. Possible reasons include lack of disease recognition, poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids and inability of inhaled steroids to fully control asthma. As earlier studies have been short term, and far from {"}real-life{"}, the NHS' National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment sought a study to look at both the short and long term impact on quality of life, clinical status and resource utilisation of using leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs). ELEVATE was conceived in response to this need and the GPIAG was successful in winning this research bid in conjunction with the University of East Anglia. Study objectives and design: The study's objective is to compare quality of life comparing LTRAs with alternative therapies at steps 2 & 3 of the National Asthma Guidelines for 720 adult patients. The study is a pragmatic randomised controlled trial over 2 years that will provide information about broadly generalisable patients in {"}real world{"} general practice.",
author = "Annie Blyth and Stan Musgrave and David Price and Ian Harvey",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1038/pcrj.2003.56",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "95",
journal = "Primary Care Respiratory Journal",
issn = "1471-4418",
publisher = "Primary Care Respiratory Society UK",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pragmatic research tales

T2 - The ELEVATE study as an illustration of the issues involved in implementing pragmatic research

AU - Blyth, Annie

AU - Musgrave, Stan

AU - Price, David

AU - Harvey, Ian

PY - 2003/9

Y1 - 2003/9

N2 - Background: Despite increased asthma preventative treatment there is evidence that large numbers of patients continue to suffer significant symptoms and lifestyle limitation. Possible reasons include lack of disease recognition, poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids and inability of inhaled steroids to fully control asthma. As earlier studies have been short term, and far from "real-life", the NHS' National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment sought a study to look at both the short and long term impact on quality of life, clinical status and resource utilisation of using leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs). ELEVATE was conceived in response to this need and the GPIAG was successful in winning this research bid in conjunction with the University of East Anglia. Study objectives and design: The study's objective is to compare quality of life comparing LTRAs with alternative therapies at steps 2 & 3 of the National Asthma Guidelines for 720 adult patients. The study is a pragmatic randomised controlled trial over 2 years that will provide information about broadly generalisable patients in "real world" general practice.

AB - Background: Despite increased asthma preventative treatment there is evidence that large numbers of patients continue to suffer significant symptoms and lifestyle limitation. Possible reasons include lack of disease recognition, poor adherence with inhaled corticosteroids and inability of inhaled steroids to fully control asthma. As earlier studies have been short term, and far from "real-life", the NHS' National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment sought a study to look at both the short and long term impact on quality of life, clinical status and resource utilisation of using leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs). ELEVATE was conceived in response to this need and the GPIAG was successful in winning this research bid in conjunction with the University of East Anglia. Study objectives and design: The study's objective is to compare quality of life comparing LTRAs with alternative therapies at steps 2 & 3 of the National Asthma Guidelines for 720 adult patients. The study is a pragmatic randomised controlled trial over 2 years that will provide information about broadly generalisable patients in "real world" general practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242323680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/pcrj.2003.56

DO - 10.1038/pcrj.2003.56

M3 - Article

C2 - 31700363

AN - SCOPUS:0242323680

VL - 12

SP - 95

JO - Primary Care Respiratory Journal

JF - Primary Care Respiratory Journal

SN - 1471-4418

IS - 3

ER -