Predictability's aftermath

Downstream consequences of word predictability as revealed by repetition effects

Joost Rommers (Corresponding Author), Kara D. Federmeier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Stimulus processing in language and beyond is shaped by context, with predictability having a particularly well-attested influence on the rapid processes that unfold during the presentation of a word. But does predictability also have downstream consequences for the quality of the constructed representations? On the one hand, the ease of processing predictable words might free up time or cognitive resources, allowing for relatively thorough processing of the input. On the other hand, predictability might allow the system to run in a top-down “verification mode”, at the expense of thorough stimulus processing. This electroencephalogram (EEG) study manipulated word predictability, which reduced N400 amplitude and inter-trial phase clustering (ITPC), and then probed the fate of the (un)predictable words in memory by presenting them again. More thorough processing of predictable words should increase repetition effects, whereas less thorough processing should decrease them. Repetition was reflected in N400 decreases, late positive complex (LPC) enhancements, and late alpha/beta band power decreases. Critically, prior predictability tended to reduce the repetition effect on the N400, suggesting less priming, and eliminated the repetition effect on the LPC, suggesting a lack of episodic recollection. These findings converge on a top-down verification account, on which the brain processes more predictable input less thoroughly. More generally, the results demonstrate that predictability has multifaceted downstream consequences beyond processing in the moment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-30
Number of pages15
JournalCortex
Volume101
Early online date2 Jan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Word Processing
Repetition Priming
Cluster Analysis
Electroencephalography
Language
Brain
Power (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Word predictability
  • Repetition
  • Alpha power
  • Sentence comprehension

Cite this

Predictability's aftermath : Downstream consequences of word predictability as revealed by repetition effects. / Rommers, Joost (Corresponding Author); Federmeier, Kara D.

In: Cortex, Vol. 101, 04.2018, p. 16-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{157a4d1af89b421d8671e83b41328e43,
title = "Predictability's aftermath: Downstream consequences of word predictability as revealed by repetition effects",
abstract = "Stimulus processing in language and beyond is shaped by context, with predictability having a particularly well-attested influence on the rapid processes that unfold during the presentation of a word. But does predictability also have downstream consequences for the quality of the constructed representations? On the one hand, the ease of processing predictable words might free up time or cognitive resources, allowing for relatively thorough processing of the input. On the other hand, predictability might allow the system to run in a top-down “verification mode”, at the expense of thorough stimulus processing. This electroencephalogram (EEG) study manipulated word predictability, which reduced N400 amplitude and inter-trial phase clustering (ITPC), and then probed the fate of the (un)predictable words in memory by presenting them again. More thorough processing of predictable words should increase repetition effects, whereas less thorough processing should decrease them. Repetition was reflected in N400 decreases, late positive complex (LPC) enhancements, and late alpha/beta band power decreases. Critically, prior predictability tended to reduce the repetition effect on the N400, suggesting less priming, and eliminated the repetition effect on the LPC, suggesting a lack of episodic recollection. These findings converge on a top-down verification account, on which the brain processes more predictable input less thoroughly. More generally, the results demonstrate that predictability has multifaceted downstream consequences beyond processing in the moment.",
keywords = "Word predictability, Repetition, Alpha power, Sentence comprehension",
author = "Joost Rommers and Federmeier, {Kara D.}",
note = "Acknowledgments A James S. McDonnell Foundation Scholar Award and NIH grant AG026308 to K.D.F supported this work. J.R. is supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) grant 275-89-032. We thank Rami Alsaqri, Vivek Dave and Neha Vagadia for assistance with stimulus development and/or data collection, and Ryan J. Hubbard for sharing independent component analysis scripts.",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.cortex.2017.12.018",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "16--30",
journal = "Cortex",
issn = "0010-9452",
publisher = "Masson SpA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictability's aftermath

T2 - Downstream consequences of word predictability as revealed by repetition effects

AU - Rommers, Joost

AU - Federmeier, Kara D.

N1 - Acknowledgments A James S. McDonnell Foundation Scholar Award and NIH grant AG026308 to K.D.F supported this work. J.R. is supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) grant 275-89-032. We thank Rami Alsaqri, Vivek Dave and Neha Vagadia for assistance with stimulus development and/or data collection, and Ryan J. Hubbard for sharing independent component analysis scripts.

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - Stimulus processing in language and beyond is shaped by context, with predictability having a particularly well-attested influence on the rapid processes that unfold during the presentation of a word. But does predictability also have downstream consequences for the quality of the constructed representations? On the one hand, the ease of processing predictable words might free up time or cognitive resources, allowing for relatively thorough processing of the input. On the other hand, predictability might allow the system to run in a top-down “verification mode”, at the expense of thorough stimulus processing. This electroencephalogram (EEG) study manipulated word predictability, which reduced N400 amplitude and inter-trial phase clustering (ITPC), and then probed the fate of the (un)predictable words in memory by presenting them again. More thorough processing of predictable words should increase repetition effects, whereas less thorough processing should decrease them. Repetition was reflected in N400 decreases, late positive complex (LPC) enhancements, and late alpha/beta band power decreases. Critically, prior predictability tended to reduce the repetition effect on the N400, suggesting less priming, and eliminated the repetition effect on the LPC, suggesting a lack of episodic recollection. These findings converge on a top-down verification account, on which the brain processes more predictable input less thoroughly. More generally, the results demonstrate that predictability has multifaceted downstream consequences beyond processing in the moment.

AB - Stimulus processing in language and beyond is shaped by context, with predictability having a particularly well-attested influence on the rapid processes that unfold during the presentation of a word. But does predictability also have downstream consequences for the quality of the constructed representations? On the one hand, the ease of processing predictable words might free up time or cognitive resources, allowing for relatively thorough processing of the input. On the other hand, predictability might allow the system to run in a top-down “verification mode”, at the expense of thorough stimulus processing. This electroencephalogram (EEG) study manipulated word predictability, which reduced N400 amplitude and inter-trial phase clustering (ITPC), and then probed the fate of the (un)predictable words in memory by presenting them again. More thorough processing of predictable words should increase repetition effects, whereas less thorough processing should decrease them. Repetition was reflected in N400 decreases, late positive complex (LPC) enhancements, and late alpha/beta band power decreases. Critically, prior predictability tended to reduce the repetition effect on the N400, suggesting less priming, and eliminated the repetition effect on the LPC, suggesting a lack of episodic recollection. These findings converge on a top-down verification account, on which the brain processes more predictable input less thoroughly. More generally, the results demonstrate that predictability has multifaceted downstream consequences beyond processing in the moment.

KW - Word predictability

KW - Repetition

KW - Alpha power

KW - Sentence comprehension

U2 - 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.12.018

DO - 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.12.018

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 16

EP - 30

JO - Cortex

JF - Cortex

SN - 0010-9452

ER -