Predicting Fertility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Various predictors of fertility have been described, suggesting that none are ideal. The literature on tests of ovarian reserve is largely limited to women undergoing in vitro fertilization, and is reliant on the use of surrogate markers, such as cycle cancellation and number of oocytes retrieved, as reference standards. Currently available prediction models are far from ideal; most are applicable only to subfertile women seeking assisted reproduction, and lack external validation. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of predictors of fertility are limited by their heterogeneity in terms of the population sampled, predictors tested and reference standards used. There is an urgent need for consensus in the design of these studies, definition of abnormal tests, and, above all, a need to use robust outcomes such as live birth as the reference standard. There are no reliable predictors of fertility that can guide women as to how long childbearing can be deferred.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109-117
Number of pages18
JournalHuman Fertility
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Fertility
Live Birth
Fertilization in Vitro
Oocytes
Reproduction
Meta-Analysis
Biomarkers
Population
Ovarian Reserve

Keywords

  • age
  • fertility
  • ovarian reserve
  • prediction models
  • predictors

Cite this

Predicting Fertility. / Maheshwari, Abha; Bhattacharya, Siladitya; Johnson, Neil P.

In: Human Fertility, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2008, p. 109-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Maheshwari, Abha ; Bhattacharya, Siladitya ; Johnson, Neil P. / Predicting Fertility. In: Human Fertility. 2008 ; Vol. 11, No. 2. pp. 109-117.
@article{4f98bf8df74840f3bd454f760e3f158b,
title = "Predicting Fertility",
abstract = "Various predictors of fertility have been described, suggesting that none are ideal. The literature on tests of ovarian reserve is largely limited to women undergoing in vitro fertilization, and is reliant on the use of surrogate markers, such as cycle cancellation and number of oocytes retrieved, as reference standards. Currently available prediction models are far from ideal; most are applicable only to subfertile women seeking assisted reproduction, and lack external validation. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of predictors of fertility are limited by their heterogeneity in terms of the population sampled, predictors tested and reference standards used. There is an urgent need for consensus in the design of these studies, definition of abnormal tests, and, above all, a need to use robust outcomes such as live birth as the reference standard. There are no reliable predictors of fertility that can guide women as to how long childbearing can be deferred.",
keywords = "age, fertility, ovarian reserve, prediction models, predictors",
author = "Abha Maheshwari and Siladitya Bhattacharya and Johnson, {Neil P.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/14647270701832346",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "109--117",
journal = "Human Fertility",
issn = "1464-7273",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting Fertility

AU - Maheshwari, Abha

AU - Bhattacharya, Siladitya

AU - Johnson, Neil P.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Various predictors of fertility have been described, suggesting that none are ideal. The literature on tests of ovarian reserve is largely limited to women undergoing in vitro fertilization, and is reliant on the use of surrogate markers, such as cycle cancellation and number of oocytes retrieved, as reference standards. Currently available prediction models are far from ideal; most are applicable only to subfertile women seeking assisted reproduction, and lack external validation. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of predictors of fertility are limited by their heterogeneity in terms of the population sampled, predictors tested and reference standards used. There is an urgent need for consensus in the design of these studies, definition of abnormal tests, and, above all, a need to use robust outcomes such as live birth as the reference standard. There are no reliable predictors of fertility that can guide women as to how long childbearing can be deferred.

AB - Various predictors of fertility have been described, suggesting that none are ideal. The literature on tests of ovarian reserve is largely limited to women undergoing in vitro fertilization, and is reliant on the use of surrogate markers, such as cycle cancellation and number of oocytes retrieved, as reference standards. Currently available prediction models are far from ideal; most are applicable only to subfertile women seeking assisted reproduction, and lack external validation. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of predictors of fertility are limited by their heterogeneity in terms of the population sampled, predictors tested and reference standards used. There is an urgent need for consensus in the design of these studies, definition of abnormal tests, and, above all, a need to use robust outcomes such as live birth as the reference standard. There are no reliable predictors of fertility that can guide women as to how long childbearing can be deferred.

KW - age

KW - fertility

KW - ovarian reserve

KW - prediction models

KW - predictors

U2 - 10.1080/14647270701832346

DO - 10.1080/14647270701832346

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 109

EP - 117

JO - Human Fertility

JF - Human Fertility

SN - 1464-7273

IS - 2

ER -