Predictors of hip joint replacement in new attenders in primary care with hip pain

F. Birrell, C. Afzal, E. Nahit, M. Lunt, Gary John MacFarlane, C. Cooper, P. Croft, G. Hosie, A. J. Silman

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Studies investigating the factors associated with need for total hip replacement should ideally be based on prospective investigation of new attenders in primary care.

Aim. To determine the incidence of listing for total hip replacement and its predictors, among attenders in primary care with a new episode of hip pain.

Design of study: Prospective multicentre cohort study.

Setting: One hundred and ninety-five patients (mean age = 63 years, 68% female) with new episode of hip pain, attending primary care between November 1994 and October 1997 At the first visit patients were evaluated for indices of pain and disability, range of hip movement, and radiographic changes of osteoarthritis.

Method: General practitioner participants were recruited from the membership of the Primary Care Rheumatology Society to recruit all consecutive attenders with a new episode of hip pain. Annual follow-up was carried out to determine which patients were being put on a waiting list' for total hip replacement.

Results: Seven per cent of patients were put on a waiting list for total hip replacement within 12 months and 23% of patients within four years. At presentation, pain duration, pain severity, (including the need to use a stick) and restriction of internal rotation were the major clinical predictors of being put on a waiting list Radiographic predictors of osteoarthritis performed similarly to the clinical measures A simple scoring system based on both radiographic severity and two of the clinical measures was derived that identified groups at high likelihood of being put on a waiting list (sensitivity = 76%) with a low false-positive rate (specificity = 95%).

Conclusion: New primary care attenders with pain are frequently accepted for total hip replacement soon after their first attendance - a decision that can be predicted by simple clinical measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-30
Number of pages4
JournalThe British Journal of General Practice
Volume53
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Keywords

  • total hip replacement
  • waiting list
  • orthopaedic referral
  • primary care
  • OSTEOARTHRITIS
  • SURGERY
  • PROJECT
  • NEED

Cite this

Birrell, F., Afzal, C., Nahit, E., Lunt, M., MacFarlane, G. J., Cooper, C., ... Silman, A. J. (2003). Predictors of hip joint replacement in new attenders in primary care with hip pain. The British Journal of General Practice, 53, 26-30.

Predictors of hip joint replacement in new attenders in primary care with hip pain. / Birrell, F.; Afzal, C.; Nahit, E.; Lunt, M.; MacFarlane, Gary John; Cooper, C.; Croft, P.; Hosie, G.; Silman, A. J.

In: The British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 53, 2003, p. 26-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Birrell, F, Afzal, C, Nahit, E, Lunt, M, MacFarlane, GJ, Cooper, C, Croft, P, Hosie, G & Silman, AJ 2003, 'Predictors of hip joint replacement in new attenders in primary care with hip pain', The British Journal of General Practice, vol. 53, pp. 26-30.
Birrell, F. ; Afzal, C. ; Nahit, E. ; Lunt, M. ; MacFarlane, Gary John ; Cooper, C. ; Croft, P. ; Hosie, G. ; Silman, A. J. / Predictors of hip joint replacement in new attenders in primary care with hip pain. In: The British Journal of General Practice. 2003 ; Vol. 53. pp. 26-30.
@article{b2f7c903ffc441beb1a481b3f6fc9972,
title = "Predictors of hip joint replacement in new attenders in primary care with hip pain",
abstract = "Background: Studies investigating the factors associated with need for total hip replacement should ideally be based on prospective investigation of new attenders in primary care.Aim. To determine the incidence of listing for total hip replacement and its predictors, among attenders in primary care with a new episode of hip pain.Design of study: Prospective multicentre cohort study.Setting: One hundred and ninety-five patients (mean age = 63 years, 68{\%} female) with new episode of hip pain, attending primary care between November 1994 and October 1997 At the first visit patients were evaluated for indices of pain and disability, range of hip movement, and radiographic changes of osteoarthritis.Method: General practitioner participants were recruited from the membership of the Primary Care Rheumatology Society to recruit all consecutive attenders with a new episode of hip pain. Annual follow-up was carried out to determine which patients were being put on a waiting list' for total hip replacement.Results: Seven per cent of patients were put on a waiting list for total hip replacement within 12 months and 23{\%} of patients within four years. At presentation, pain duration, pain severity, (including the need to use a stick) and restriction of internal rotation were the major clinical predictors of being put on a waiting list Radiographic predictors of osteoarthritis performed similarly to the clinical measures A simple scoring system based on both radiographic severity and two of the clinical measures was derived that identified groups at high likelihood of being put on a waiting list (sensitivity = 76{\%}) with a low false-positive rate (specificity = 95{\%}).Conclusion: New primary care attenders with pain are frequently accepted for total hip replacement soon after their first attendance - a decision that can be predicted by simple clinical measures.",
keywords = "total hip replacement, waiting list, orthopaedic referral, primary care, OSTEOARTHRITIS, SURGERY, PROJECT, NEED",
author = "F. Birrell and C. Afzal and E. Nahit and M. Lunt and MacFarlane, {Gary John} and C. Cooper and P. Croft and G. Hosie and Silman, {A. J.}",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "26--30",
journal = "The British Journal of General Practice",
issn = "0960-1643",
publisher = "Royal College of General Practitioners",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors of hip joint replacement in new attenders in primary care with hip pain

AU - Birrell, F.

AU - Afzal, C.

AU - Nahit, E.

AU - Lunt, M.

AU - MacFarlane, Gary John

AU - Cooper, C.

AU - Croft, P.

AU - Hosie, G.

AU - Silman, A. J.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Background: Studies investigating the factors associated with need for total hip replacement should ideally be based on prospective investigation of new attenders in primary care.Aim. To determine the incidence of listing for total hip replacement and its predictors, among attenders in primary care with a new episode of hip pain.Design of study: Prospective multicentre cohort study.Setting: One hundred and ninety-five patients (mean age = 63 years, 68% female) with new episode of hip pain, attending primary care between November 1994 and October 1997 At the first visit patients were evaluated for indices of pain and disability, range of hip movement, and radiographic changes of osteoarthritis.Method: General practitioner participants were recruited from the membership of the Primary Care Rheumatology Society to recruit all consecutive attenders with a new episode of hip pain. Annual follow-up was carried out to determine which patients were being put on a waiting list' for total hip replacement.Results: Seven per cent of patients were put on a waiting list for total hip replacement within 12 months and 23% of patients within four years. At presentation, pain duration, pain severity, (including the need to use a stick) and restriction of internal rotation were the major clinical predictors of being put on a waiting list Radiographic predictors of osteoarthritis performed similarly to the clinical measures A simple scoring system based on both radiographic severity and two of the clinical measures was derived that identified groups at high likelihood of being put on a waiting list (sensitivity = 76%) with a low false-positive rate (specificity = 95%).Conclusion: New primary care attenders with pain are frequently accepted for total hip replacement soon after their first attendance - a decision that can be predicted by simple clinical measures.

AB - Background: Studies investigating the factors associated with need for total hip replacement should ideally be based on prospective investigation of new attenders in primary care.Aim. To determine the incidence of listing for total hip replacement and its predictors, among attenders in primary care with a new episode of hip pain.Design of study: Prospective multicentre cohort study.Setting: One hundred and ninety-five patients (mean age = 63 years, 68% female) with new episode of hip pain, attending primary care between November 1994 and October 1997 At the first visit patients were evaluated for indices of pain and disability, range of hip movement, and radiographic changes of osteoarthritis.Method: General practitioner participants were recruited from the membership of the Primary Care Rheumatology Society to recruit all consecutive attenders with a new episode of hip pain. Annual follow-up was carried out to determine which patients were being put on a waiting list' for total hip replacement.Results: Seven per cent of patients were put on a waiting list for total hip replacement within 12 months and 23% of patients within four years. At presentation, pain duration, pain severity, (including the need to use a stick) and restriction of internal rotation were the major clinical predictors of being put on a waiting list Radiographic predictors of osteoarthritis performed similarly to the clinical measures A simple scoring system based on both radiographic severity and two of the clinical measures was derived that identified groups at high likelihood of being put on a waiting list (sensitivity = 76%) with a low false-positive rate (specificity = 95%).Conclusion: New primary care attenders with pain are frequently accepted for total hip replacement soon after their first attendance - a decision that can be predicted by simple clinical measures.

KW - total hip replacement

KW - waiting list

KW - orthopaedic referral

KW - primary care

KW - OSTEOARTHRITIS

KW - SURGERY

KW - PROJECT

KW - NEED

M3 - Editorial

VL - 53

SP - 26

EP - 30

JO - The British Journal of General Practice

JF - The British Journal of General Practice

SN - 0960-1643

ER -