Primary care quality and safety systems in the English National Health Service

a case study of a new type of primary care provider

Richard Baker, Janet Willars, Sarah McNicol, Mary Dixon-Woods, Lorna McKee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives Although the predominant model of general practice in the UK National Health Service (NHS) remains the small partnership owned and run by general practitioners (GPs), new types of provider are emerging. We sought to characterize the quality and safety systems and processes used in one large, privately owned company providing primary care through a chain of over 50 general practices in England.
Methods Senior staff with responsibility for policy on quality and safety were interviewed. We also undertook ethnographic observation in non-clinical areas and interviews with staff in three practices.
Results A small senior executive team set policy and strategy on quality and safety, including a systematic incident reporting and investigation system and processes for disseminating learning with a strong emphasis on customer focus. Standardization of systems was possible because of the large number of practices. Policies appeared generally well implemented at practice level. However, there was some evidence of high staff turnover, particularly of GPs. This caused problems for continuity of care and challenges in inducting new GPs in the company’s systems and procedures.
Conclusions A model of primary care delivery based on a corporate chain may be useful in standardizing policies and procedures, facilitating implementation of systems, and relieving clinical staff of administrative duties. However, the model also poses some risks, including those relating to stability. Provider forms that retain the long term, personal commitment of staff to their practices, such as federations or networks, should also be investigated; they may offer the benefits of a corporate chain combined with the greater continuity and stability of the more traditional general practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-41
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Health Services Research & Policy
Volume19
Issue number1
Early online date6 Sep 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

National Health Programs
Primary Health Care
General Practice
General Practitioners
Safety
Continuity of Patient Care
Risk Management
England
Observation
Learning
Interviews

Keywords

  • private providers
  • primary care
  • quality safety systems

Cite this

Primary care quality and safety systems in the English National Health Service : a case study of a new type of primary care provider. / Baker, Richard; Willars, Janet; McNicol, Sarah; Dixon-Woods, Mary; McKee, Lorna.

In: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, Vol. 19, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 34-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baker, Richard ; Willars, Janet ; McNicol, Sarah ; Dixon-Woods, Mary ; McKee, Lorna. / Primary care quality and safety systems in the English National Health Service : a case study of a new type of primary care provider. In: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2014 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 34-41.
@article{2f89e50b655340dfab6f4eed75884df6,
title = "Primary care quality and safety systems in the English National Health Service: a case study of a new type of primary care provider",
abstract = "Objectives Although the predominant model of general practice in the UK National Health Service (NHS) remains the small partnership owned and run by general practitioners (GPs), new types of provider are emerging. We sought to characterize the quality and safety systems and processes used in one large, privately owned company providing primary care through a chain of over 50 general practices in England.Methods Senior staff with responsibility for policy on quality and safety were interviewed. We also undertook ethnographic observation in non-clinical areas and interviews with staff in three practices.Results A small senior executive team set policy and strategy on quality and safety, including a systematic incident reporting and investigation system and processes for disseminating learning with a strong emphasis on customer focus. Standardization of systems was possible because of the large number of practices. Policies appeared generally well implemented at practice level. However, there was some evidence of high staff turnover, particularly of GPs. This caused problems for continuity of care and challenges in inducting new GPs in the company’s systems and procedures.Conclusions A model of primary care delivery based on a corporate chain may be useful in standardizing policies and procedures, facilitating implementation of systems, and relieving clinical staff of administrative duties. However, the model also poses some risks, including those relating to stability. Provider forms that retain the long term, personal commitment of staff to their practices, such as federations or networks, should also be investigated; they may offer the benefits of a corporate chain combined with the greater continuity and stability of the more traditional general practice.",
keywords = "private providers, primary care , quality safety systems",
author = "Richard Baker and Janet Willars and Sarah McNicol and Mary Dixon-Woods and Lorna McKee",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1355819613500664",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "34--41",
journal = "Journal of Health Services Research & Policy",
issn = "1355-8196",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary care quality and safety systems in the English National Health Service

T2 - a case study of a new type of primary care provider

AU - Baker, Richard

AU - Willars, Janet

AU - McNicol, Sarah

AU - Dixon-Woods, Mary

AU - McKee, Lorna

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Objectives Although the predominant model of general practice in the UK National Health Service (NHS) remains the small partnership owned and run by general practitioners (GPs), new types of provider are emerging. We sought to characterize the quality and safety systems and processes used in one large, privately owned company providing primary care through a chain of over 50 general practices in England.Methods Senior staff with responsibility for policy on quality and safety were interviewed. We also undertook ethnographic observation in non-clinical areas and interviews with staff in three practices.Results A small senior executive team set policy and strategy on quality and safety, including a systematic incident reporting and investigation system and processes for disseminating learning with a strong emphasis on customer focus. Standardization of systems was possible because of the large number of practices. Policies appeared generally well implemented at practice level. However, there was some evidence of high staff turnover, particularly of GPs. This caused problems for continuity of care and challenges in inducting new GPs in the company’s systems and procedures.Conclusions A model of primary care delivery based on a corporate chain may be useful in standardizing policies and procedures, facilitating implementation of systems, and relieving clinical staff of administrative duties. However, the model also poses some risks, including those relating to stability. Provider forms that retain the long term, personal commitment of staff to their practices, such as federations or networks, should also be investigated; they may offer the benefits of a corporate chain combined with the greater continuity and stability of the more traditional general practice.

AB - Objectives Although the predominant model of general practice in the UK National Health Service (NHS) remains the small partnership owned and run by general practitioners (GPs), new types of provider are emerging. We sought to characterize the quality and safety systems and processes used in one large, privately owned company providing primary care through a chain of over 50 general practices in England.Methods Senior staff with responsibility for policy on quality and safety were interviewed. We also undertook ethnographic observation in non-clinical areas and interviews with staff in three practices.Results A small senior executive team set policy and strategy on quality and safety, including a systematic incident reporting and investigation system and processes for disseminating learning with a strong emphasis on customer focus. Standardization of systems was possible because of the large number of practices. Policies appeared generally well implemented at practice level. However, there was some evidence of high staff turnover, particularly of GPs. This caused problems for continuity of care and challenges in inducting new GPs in the company’s systems and procedures.Conclusions A model of primary care delivery based on a corporate chain may be useful in standardizing policies and procedures, facilitating implementation of systems, and relieving clinical staff of administrative duties. However, the model also poses some risks, including those relating to stability. Provider forms that retain the long term, personal commitment of staff to their practices, such as federations or networks, should also be investigated; they may offer the benefits of a corporate chain combined with the greater continuity and stability of the more traditional general practice.

KW - private providers

KW - primary care

KW - quality safety systems

U2 - 10.1177/1355819613500664

DO - 10.1177/1355819613500664

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 34

EP - 41

JO - Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

JF - Journal of Health Services Research & Policy

SN - 1355-8196

IS - 1

ER -