Primary mode of delivery and subsequent pregnancy

J. Mollinson, Maureen Anne Porter, Doris Margaret Campbell, Siladitya Bhattacharya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To investigate the relationship between primary mode of delivery and subsequent pregnancy and to compare the findings with a previous study conducted on an earlier cohort from the same population.

Design Population cohort.

Setting Aberdeen City, Scotland.

Population Women who delivered their first singleton child in Aberdeen Maternity Hospital between 1980 and 1997.

Methods Population-based data relating to the index and next pregnancy event, if any, were obtained from the Aberdeen Maternity Neonatal Databank. Subsequent pregnancy was compared across the three modes of delivery groups using log rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Main outcome measure First subsequent pregnancy following index delivery.

Results Women who delivered by caesarean section (CS) were less likely to have a subsequent pregnancy compared with those who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), hazard ratio = 0.91 (95% CI 0.87, 0.95). This confirmed the findings of a previous study conducted on an earlier cohort of the same population. The median time to next pregnancy following CS was 36.3 months, 31.8 months following instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) and 30.4 months following SVD. In contrast to the earlier study where women who had an instrumental delivery were found to be an intermediate group, we found no difference in subsequent pregnancy following IVD compared with SVD, HR = 1.0 (95% CI 0.96, 1.03).

Conclusions Following an initial delivery by CS, fewer women went on to have another pregnancy compared with SVD. The incidence of subsequent pregnancy is similar following instrumental and SVD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1061-1065
Number of pages4
JournalBJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume112
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2005

Keywords

  • CESAREAN-SECTION
  • INFERTILITY
  • FERTILITY
  • COHORT

Cite this

Primary mode of delivery and subsequent pregnancy. / Mollinson, J.; Porter, Maureen Anne; Campbell, Doris Margaret; Bhattacharya, Siladitya.

In: BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 112, No. 8, 08.2005, p. 1061-1065.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mollinson, J. ; Porter, Maureen Anne ; Campbell, Doris Margaret ; Bhattacharya, Siladitya. / Primary mode of delivery and subsequent pregnancy. In: BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2005 ; Vol. 112, No. 8. pp. 1061-1065.
@article{f741a1bee19d481eb9ba0213c702dd0e,
title = "Primary mode of delivery and subsequent pregnancy",
abstract = "Objective To investigate the relationship between primary mode of delivery and subsequent pregnancy and to compare the findings with a previous study conducted on an earlier cohort from the same population.Design Population cohort.Setting Aberdeen City, Scotland.Population Women who delivered their first singleton child in Aberdeen Maternity Hospital between 1980 and 1997.Methods Population-based data relating to the index and next pregnancy event, if any, were obtained from the Aberdeen Maternity Neonatal Databank. Subsequent pregnancy was compared across the three modes of delivery groups using log rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression models.Main outcome measure First subsequent pregnancy following index delivery.Results Women who delivered by caesarean section (CS) were less likely to have a subsequent pregnancy compared with those who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), hazard ratio = 0.91 (95{\%} CI 0.87, 0.95). This confirmed the findings of a previous study conducted on an earlier cohort of the same population. The median time to next pregnancy following CS was 36.3 months, 31.8 months following instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) and 30.4 months following SVD. In contrast to the earlier study where women who had an instrumental delivery were found to be an intermediate group, we found no difference in subsequent pregnancy following IVD compared with SVD, HR = 1.0 (95{\%} CI 0.96, 1.03).Conclusions Following an initial delivery by CS, fewer women went on to have another pregnancy compared with SVD. The incidence of subsequent pregnancy is similar following instrumental and SVD.",
keywords = "CESAREAN-SECTION, INFERTILITY, FERTILITY, COHORT",
author = "J. Mollinson and Porter, {Maureen Anne} and Campbell, {Doris Margaret} and Siladitya Bhattacharya",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/J.1471-0528.2005.00651.X",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "1061--1065",
journal = "BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (10.1111)",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Primary mode of delivery and subsequent pregnancy

AU - Mollinson, J.

AU - Porter, Maureen Anne

AU - Campbell, Doris Margaret

AU - Bhattacharya, Siladitya

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - Objective To investigate the relationship between primary mode of delivery and subsequent pregnancy and to compare the findings with a previous study conducted on an earlier cohort from the same population.Design Population cohort.Setting Aberdeen City, Scotland.Population Women who delivered their first singleton child in Aberdeen Maternity Hospital between 1980 and 1997.Methods Population-based data relating to the index and next pregnancy event, if any, were obtained from the Aberdeen Maternity Neonatal Databank. Subsequent pregnancy was compared across the three modes of delivery groups using log rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression models.Main outcome measure First subsequent pregnancy following index delivery.Results Women who delivered by caesarean section (CS) were less likely to have a subsequent pregnancy compared with those who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), hazard ratio = 0.91 (95% CI 0.87, 0.95). This confirmed the findings of a previous study conducted on an earlier cohort of the same population. The median time to next pregnancy following CS was 36.3 months, 31.8 months following instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) and 30.4 months following SVD. In contrast to the earlier study where women who had an instrumental delivery were found to be an intermediate group, we found no difference in subsequent pregnancy following IVD compared with SVD, HR = 1.0 (95% CI 0.96, 1.03).Conclusions Following an initial delivery by CS, fewer women went on to have another pregnancy compared with SVD. The incidence of subsequent pregnancy is similar following instrumental and SVD.

AB - Objective To investigate the relationship between primary mode of delivery and subsequent pregnancy and to compare the findings with a previous study conducted on an earlier cohort from the same population.Design Population cohort.Setting Aberdeen City, Scotland.Population Women who delivered their first singleton child in Aberdeen Maternity Hospital between 1980 and 1997.Methods Population-based data relating to the index and next pregnancy event, if any, were obtained from the Aberdeen Maternity Neonatal Databank. Subsequent pregnancy was compared across the three modes of delivery groups using log rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regression models.Main outcome measure First subsequent pregnancy following index delivery.Results Women who delivered by caesarean section (CS) were less likely to have a subsequent pregnancy compared with those who had a spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), hazard ratio = 0.91 (95% CI 0.87, 0.95). This confirmed the findings of a previous study conducted on an earlier cohort of the same population. The median time to next pregnancy following CS was 36.3 months, 31.8 months following instrumental vaginal delivery (IVD) and 30.4 months following SVD. In contrast to the earlier study where women who had an instrumental delivery were found to be an intermediate group, we found no difference in subsequent pregnancy following IVD compared with SVD, HR = 1.0 (95% CI 0.96, 1.03).Conclusions Following an initial delivery by CS, fewer women went on to have another pregnancy compared with SVD. The incidence of subsequent pregnancy is similar following instrumental and SVD.

KW - CESAREAN-SECTION

KW - INFERTILITY

KW - FERTILITY

KW - COHORT

U2 - 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2005.00651.X

DO - 10.1111/J.1471-0528.2005.00651.X

M3 - Article

VL - 112

SP - 1061

EP - 1065

JO - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 8

ER -