Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks

Benjamin William Tatler*, Yoriko Hirose, Sarah K. Finnegan, Riina Pievilainen, Clare Kirtley, Alan Kennedy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Selecting and remembering visual information is an active and competitive process. In natural environments, representations are tightly coupled to task. Objects that are task-relevant are remembered better due to a combination of increased selection for fixation and strategic control of encoding and/or retaining viewed information. However, it is not understood how physically manipulating objects when performing a natural task influences priorities for selection and memory. In this study, we compare priorities for selection and memory when actively engaged in a natural task with first-person observation of the same object manipulations. Results suggest that active manipulation of a task-relevant object results in a specific prioritization for object position information compared with other properties and compared with action observation of the same manipulations. Experiment 2 confirms that this spatial prioritization is likely to arise from manipulation rather than differences in spatial representation in real environments and the movies used for action observation. Thus, our findings imply that physical manipulation of task relevant objects results in a specific prioritization of spatial information about task-relevant objects, possibly coupled with strategic de-prioritization of colour memory for irrelevant objects.
Original languageEnglish
Article number20130066
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume368
Issue number1628
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Oct 2013

Fingerprint

prioritization
Observation
Data storage equipment
Motion Pictures
Color
fixation
color
Experiments
experiment

Keywords

  • natural task
  • action
  • video
  • priority
  • memory
  • fixation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks. / Tatler, Benjamin William; Hirose, Yoriko; Finnegan, Sarah K.; Pievilainen, Riina; Kirtley, Clare; Kennedy, Alan.

In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 368, No. 1628, 20130066, 19.10.2013, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tatler, Benjamin William ; Hirose, Yoriko ; Finnegan, Sarah K. ; Pievilainen, Riina ; Kirtley, Clare ; Kennedy, Alan. / Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks. In: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2013 ; Vol. 368, No. 1628. pp. 1-9.
@article{5acbfbf1f3014edfb6923d19cda234ca,
title = "Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks",
abstract = "Selecting and remembering visual information is an active and competitive process. In natural environments, representations are tightly coupled to task. Objects that are task-relevant are remembered better due to a combination of increased selection for fixation and strategic control of encoding and/or retaining viewed information. However, it is not understood how physically manipulating objects when performing a natural task influences priorities for selection and memory. In this study, we compare priorities for selection and memory when actively engaged in a natural task with first-person observation of the same object manipulations. Results suggest that active manipulation of a task-relevant object results in a specific prioritization for object position information compared with other properties and compared with action observation of the same manipulations. Experiment 2 confirms that this spatial prioritization is likely to arise from manipulation rather than differences in spatial representation in real environments and the movies used for action observation. Thus, our findings imply that physical manipulation of task relevant objects results in a specific prioritization of spatial information about task-relevant objects, possibly coupled with strategic de-prioritization of colour memory for irrelevant objects.",
keywords = "natural task, action, video, priority, memory, fixation",
author = "Tatler, {Benjamin William} and Yoriko Hirose and Finnegan, {Sarah K.} and Riina Pievilainen and Clare Kirtley and Alan Kennedy",
note = "This research was supported by a research grant awarded to B.T. and A.K. by The Leverhulme Trust (Project No. F00143O).",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1098/rstb.2013.0066",
language = "English",
volume = "368",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences",
issn = "0962-8436",
publisher = "ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY",
number = "1628",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks

AU - Tatler, Benjamin William

AU - Hirose, Yoriko

AU - Finnegan, Sarah K.

AU - Pievilainen, Riina

AU - Kirtley, Clare

AU - Kennedy, Alan

N1 - This research was supported by a research grant awarded to B.T. and A.K. by The Leverhulme Trust (Project No. F00143O).

PY - 2013/10/19

Y1 - 2013/10/19

N2 - Selecting and remembering visual information is an active and competitive process. In natural environments, representations are tightly coupled to task. Objects that are task-relevant are remembered better due to a combination of increased selection for fixation and strategic control of encoding and/or retaining viewed information. However, it is not understood how physically manipulating objects when performing a natural task influences priorities for selection and memory. In this study, we compare priorities for selection and memory when actively engaged in a natural task with first-person observation of the same object manipulations. Results suggest that active manipulation of a task-relevant object results in a specific prioritization for object position information compared with other properties and compared with action observation of the same manipulations. Experiment 2 confirms that this spatial prioritization is likely to arise from manipulation rather than differences in spatial representation in real environments and the movies used for action observation. Thus, our findings imply that physical manipulation of task relevant objects results in a specific prioritization of spatial information about task-relevant objects, possibly coupled with strategic de-prioritization of colour memory for irrelevant objects.

AB - Selecting and remembering visual information is an active and competitive process. In natural environments, representations are tightly coupled to task. Objects that are task-relevant are remembered better due to a combination of increased selection for fixation and strategic control of encoding and/or retaining viewed information. However, it is not understood how physically manipulating objects when performing a natural task influences priorities for selection and memory. In this study, we compare priorities for selection and memory when actively engaged in a natural task with first-person observation of the same object manipulations. Results suggest that active manipulation of a task-relevant object results in a specific prioritization for object position information compared with other properties and compared with action observation of the same manipulations. Experiment 2 confirms that this spatial prioritization is likely to arise from manipulation rather than differences in spatial representation in real environments and the movies used for action observation. Thus, our findings imply that physical manipulation of task relevant objects results in a specific prioritization of spatial information about task-relevant objects, possibly coupled with strategic de-prioritization of colour memory for irrelevant objects.

KW - natural task

KW - action

KW - video

KW - priority

KW - memory

KW - fixation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896589531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1098/rstb.2013.0066

DO - 10.1098/rstb.2013.0066

M3 - Article

VL - 368

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

JF - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

SN - 0962-8436

IS - 1628

M1 - 20130066

ER -