Priority research questions for the UK food system

John S I Ingram, Hugh L Wright, Lucy Foster, Timothy Aldred, David Barling, Tim G Benton, Paul M Berryman, Charles S Bestwick, Alice Bows-Larkin, Tim F Brocklehurst, Judith Buttriss, John Casey, Hannah Collins, Daniel S Crossley, Catherine S Dolan, Elizabeth Dowler, Robert Edwards, Karen J Finney, Julie L Fitzpatrick, Mark Fowler & 29 others David A Garrett, Jim E Godfrey, Andrew Godley, William Griffiths, Eleanor J Houlston, Michel J Kaiser, Robert Kennard, Jerry W Knox, Andrew Kuyk, Bruce R Linter, Jennie I Macdiarmid, Wayne Martindale, John C Mathers, Daniel F McGonigle, Angela Mead, Samuel J Millar, Anne Miller, Calum Murray, Ian T Norton, Stephen Parry, Marilena Pollicino, Thomas E Quested, Savvas Tassou, Leon A Terry, Richard Tiffin, Pieter van de Graaf, William Vorley, Andrew Westby, William J Sutherland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The rise of food security up international political, societal and academic agendas has led to increasing interest in novel means of improving primary food production and reducing waste. There are however, also many 'post-farm gate' activities that are critical to food security, including processing, packaging, distributing, retailing, cooking and consuming. These activities all affect a range of important food security elements, notably availability, affordability and other aspects of access, nutrition and safety. Addressing the challenge of universal food security, in the context of a number of other policy goals (e.g. social, economic and environmental sustainability), is of keen interest to a range of UK stakeholders but requires an up-to-date evidence base and continuous innovation. An exercise was therefore conducted, under the auspices of the UK Global Food Security Programme, to identify priority research questions with a focus on the UK food system (though the outcomes may be broadly applicable to other developed nations). Emphasis was placed on incorporating a wide range of perspectives ('world views') from different stakeholder groups: policy, private sector, non-governmental organisations, advocacy groups and academia. A total of 456 individuals submitted 820 questions from which 100 were selected by a process of online voting and a three-stage workshop voting exercise. These 100 final questions were sorted into 10 themes and the 'top' question for each theme identified by a further voting exercise. This step also allowed four different stakeholder groups to select the top 7-8 questions from their perspectives. Results of these voting exercises are presented. It is clear from the wide range of questions prioritised in this exercise that the different stakeholder groups identified specific research needs on a range of post-farm gate activities and food security outcomes. Evidence needs related to food affordability, nutrition and food safety (all key elements of food security) featured highly in the exercise. While there were some questions relating to climate impacts on production, other important topics for food security (e.g. trade, transport, preference and cultural needs) were not viewed as strongly by the participants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)617-636
Number of pages20
JournalFood Security
Volume5
Issue number5
Early online date24 Aug 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2013

Keywords

  • food security
  • UKfood system
  • post-farmgate activities
  • stakeholder world views
  • priority setting
  • evidence gaps
  • climate-change
  • personalized nutrition
  • future
  • security
  • diet
  • agriculture
  • health
  • waste

Cite this

Ingram, J. S. I., Wright, H. L., Foster, L., Aldred, T., Barling, D., Benton, T. G., ... Sutherland, W. J. (2013). Priority research questions for the UK food system. Food Security, 5(5), 617-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-013-0294-4

Priority research questions for the UK food system. / Ingram, John S I; Wright, Hugh L; Foster, Lucy; Aldred, Timothy; Barling, David; Benton, Tim G; Berryman, Paul M; Bestwick, Charles S; Bows-Larkin, Alice; Brocklehurst, Tim F; Buttriss, Judith; Casey, John; Collins, Hannah; Crossley, Daniel S; Dolan, Catherine S; Dowler, Elizabeth; Edwards, Robert; Finney, Karen J; Fitzpatrick, Julie L; Fowler, Mark; Garrett, David A; Godfrey, Jim E; Godley, Andrew; Griffiths, William; Houlston, Eleanor J; Kaiser, Michel J; Kennard, Robert; Knox, Jerry W; Kuyk, Andrew; Linter, Bruce R; Macdiarmid, Jennie I; Martindale, Wayne; Mathers, John C; McGonigle, Daniel F; Mead, Angela; Millar, Samuel J; Miller, Anne; Murray, Calum; Norton, Ian T; Parry, Stephen; Pollicino, Marilena; Quested, Thomas E; Tassou, Savvas; Terry, Leon A; Tiffin, Richard; van de Graaf, Pieter; Vorley, William; Westby, Andrew; Sutherland, William J.

In: Food Security, Vol. 5, No. 5, 10.2013, p. 617-636.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ingram, JSI, Wright, HL, Foster, L, Aldred, T, Barling, D, Benton, TG, Berryman, PM, Bestwick, CS, Bows-Larkin, A, Brocklehurst, TF, Buttriss, J, Casey, J, Collins, H, Crossley, DS, Dolan, CS, Dowler, E, Edwards, R, Finney, KJ, Fitzpatrick, JL, Fowler, M, Garrett, DA, Godfrey, JE, Godley, A, Griffiths, W, Houlston, EJ, Kaiser, MJ, Kennard, R, Knox, JW, Kuyk, A, Linter, BR, Macdiarmid, JI, Martindale, W, Mathers, JC, McGonigle, DF, Mead, A, Millar, SJ, Miller, A, Murray, C, Norton, IT, Parry, S, Pollicino, M, Quested, TE, Tassou, S, Terry, LA, Tiffin, R, van de Graaf, P, Vorley, W, Westby, A & Sutherland, WJ 2013, 'Priority research questions for the UK food system', Food Security, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 617-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-013-0294-4
Ingram JSI, Wright HL, Foster L, Aldred T, Barling D, Benton TG et al. Priority research questions for the UK food system. Food Security. 2013 Oct;5(5):617-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-013-0294-4
Ingram, John S I ; Wright, Hugh L ; Foster, Lucy ; Aldred, Timothy ; Barling, David ; Benton, Tim G ; Berryman, Paul M ; Bestwick, Charles S ; Bows-Larkin, Alice ; Brocklehurst, Tim F ; Buttriss, Judith ; Casey, John ; Collins, Hannah ; Crossley, Daniel S ; Dolan, Catherine S ; Dowler, Elizabeth ; Edwards, Robert ; Finney, Karen J ; Fitzpatrick, Julie L ; Fowler, Mark ; Garrett, David A ; Godfrey, Jim E ; Godley, Andrew ; Griffiths, William ; Houlston, Eleanor J ; Kaiser, Michel J ; Kennard, Robert ; Knox, Jerry W ; Kuyk, Andrew ; Linter, Bruce R ; Macdiarmid, Jennie I ; Martindale, Wayne ; Mathers, John C ; McGonigle, Daniel F ; Mead, Angela ; Millar, Samuel J ; Miller, Anne ; Murray, Calum ; Norton, Ian T ; Parry, Stephen ; Pollicino, Marilena ; Quested, Thomas E ; Tassou, Savvas ; Terry, Leon A ; Tiffin, Richard ; van de Graaf, Pieter ; Vorley, William ; Westby, Andrew ; Sutherland, William J. / Priority research questions for the UK food system. In: Food Security. 2013 ; Vol. 5, No. 5. pp. 617-636.
@article{14843fef79d94c52bd523950821489fe,
title = "Priority research questions for the UK food system",
abstract = "The rise of food security up international political, societal and academic agendas has led to increasing interest in novel means of improving primary food production and reducing waste. There are however, also many 'post-farm gate' activities that are critical to food security, including processing, packaging, distributing, retailing, cooking and consuming. These activities all affect a range of important food security elements, notably availability, affordability and other aspects of access, nutrition and safety. Addressing the challenge of universal food security, in the context of a number of other policy goals (e.g. social, economic and environmental sustainability), is of keen interest to a range of UK stakeholders but requires an up-to-date evidence base and continuous innovation. An exercise was therefore conducted, under the auspices of the UK Global Food Security Programme, to identify priority research questions with a focus on the UK food system (though the outcomes may be broadly applicable to other developed nations). Emphasis was placed on incorporating a wide range of perspectives ('world views') from different stakeholder groups: policy, private sector, non-governmental organisations, advocacy groups and academia. A total of 456 individuals submitted 820 questions from which 100 were selected by a process of online voting and a three-stage workshop voting exercise. These 100 final questions were sorted into 10 themes and the 'top' question for each theme identified by a further voting exercise. This step also allowed four different stakeholder groups to select the top 7-8 questions from their perspectives. Results of these voting exercises are presented. It is clear from the wide range of questions prioritised in this exercise that the different stakeholder groups identified specific research needs on a range of post-farm gate activities and food security outcomes. Evidence needs related to food affordability, nutrition and food safety (all key elements of food security) featured highly in the exercise. While there were some questions relating to climate impacts on production, other important topics for food security (e.g. trade, transport, preference and cultural needs) were not viewed as strongly by the participants.",
keywords = "food security, UKfood system, post-farmgate activities, stakeholder world views, priority setting, evidence gaps, climate-change, personalized nutrition, future, security, diet, agriculture, health, waste",
author = "Ingram, {John S I} and Wright, {Hugh L} and Lucy Foster and Timothy Aldred and David Barling and Benton, {Tim G} and Berryman, {Paul M} and Bestwick, {Charles S} and Alice Bows-Larkin and Brocklehurst, {Tim F} and Judith Buttriss and John Casey and Hannah Collins and Crossley, {Daniel S} and Dolan, {Catherine S} and Elizabeth Dowler and Robert Edwards and Finney, {Karen J} and Fitzpatrick, {Julie L} and Mark Fowler and Garrett, {David A} and Godfrey, {Jim E} and Andrew Godley and William Griffiths and Houlston, {Eleanor J} and Kaiser, {Michel J} and Robert Kennard and Knox, {Jerry W} and Andrew Kuyk and Linter, {Bruce R} and Macdiarmid, {Jennie I} and Wayne Martindale and Mathers, {John C} and McGonigle, {Daniel F} and Angela Mead and Millar, {Samuel J} and Anne Miller and Calum Murray and Norton, {Ian T} and Stephen Parry and Marilena Pollicino and Quested, {Thomas E} and Savvas Tassou and Terry, {Leon A} and Richard Tiffin and {van de Graaf}, Pieter and William Vorley and Andrew Westby and Sutherland, {William J}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s12571-013-0294-4",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "617--636",
journal = "Food Security",
issn = "1876-4517",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Priority research questions for the UK food system

AU - Ingram, John S I

AU - Wright, Hugh L

AU - Foster, Lucy

AU - Aldred, Timothy

AU - Barling, David

AU - Benton, Tim G

AU - Berryman, Paul M

AU - Bestwick, Charles S

AU - Bows-Larkin, Alice

AU - Brocklehurst, Tim F

AU - Buttriss, Judith

AU - Casey, John

AU - Collins, Hannah

AU - Crossley, Daniel S

AU - Dolan, Catherine S

AU - Dowler, Elizabeth

AU - Edwards, Robert

AU - Finney, Karen J

AU - Fitzpatrick, Julie L

AU - Fowler, Mark

AU - Garrett, David A

AU - Godfrey, Jim E

AU - Godley, Andrew

AU - Griffiths, William

AU - Houlston, Eleanor J

AU - Kaiser, Michel J

AU - Kennard, Robert

AU - Knox, Jerry W

AU - Kuyk, Andrew

AU - Linter, Bruce R

AU - Macdiarmid, Jennie I

AU - Martindale, Wayne

AU - Mathers, John C

AU - McGonigle, Daniel F

AU - Mead, Angela

AU - Millar, Samuel J

AU - Miller, Anne

AU - Murray, Calum

AU - Norton, Ian T

AU - Parry, Stephen

AU - Pollicino, Marilena

AU - Quested, Thomas E

AU - Tassou, Savvas

AU - Terry, Leon A

AU - Tiffin, Richard

AU - van de Graaf, Pieter

AU - Vorley, William

AU - Westby, Andrew

AU - Sutherland, William J

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - The rise of food security up international political, societal and academic agendas has led to increasing interest in novel means of improving primary food production and reducing waste. There are however, also many 'post-farm gate' activities that are critical to food security, including processing, packaging, distributing, retailing, cooking and consuming. These activities all affect a range of important food security elements, notably availability, affordability and other aspects of access, nutrition and safety. Addressing the challenge of universal food security, in the context of a number of other policy goals (e.g. social, economic and environmental sustainability), is of keen interest to a range of UK stakeholders but requires an up-to-date evidence base and continuous innovation. An exercise was therefore conducted, under the auspices of the UK Global Food Security Programme, to identify priority research questions with a focus on the UK food system (though the outcomes may be broadly applicable to other developed nations). Emphasis was placed on incorporating a wide range of perspectives ('world views') from different stakeholder groups: policy, private sector, non-governmental organisations, advocacy groups and academia. A total of 456 individuals submitted 820 questions from which 100 were selected by a process of online voting and a three-stage workshop voting exercise. These 100 final questions were sorted into 10 themes and the 'top' question for each theme identified by a further voting exercise. This step also allowed four different stakeholder groups to select the top 7-8 questions from their perspectives. Results of these voting exercises are presented. It is clear from the wide range of questions prioritised in this exercise that the different stakeholder groups identified specific research needs on a range of post-farm gate activities and food security outcomes. Evidence needs related to food affordability, nutrition and food safety (all key elements of food security) featured highly in the exercise. While there were some questions relating to climate impacts on production, other important topics for food security (e.g. trade, transport, preference and cultural needs) were not viewed as strongly by the participants.

AB - The rise of food security up international political, societal and academic agendas has led to increasing interest in novel means of improving primary food production and reducing waste. There are however, also many 'post-farm gate' activities that are critical to food security, including processing, packaging, distributing, retailing, cooking and consuming. These activities all affect a range of important food security elements, notably availability, affordability and other aspects of access, nutrition and safety. Addressing the challenge of universal food security, in the context of a number of other policy goals (e.g. social, economic and environmental sustainability), is of keen interest to a range of UK stakeholders but requires an up-to-date evidence base and continuous innovation. An exercise was therefore conducted, under the auspices of the UK Global Food Security Programme, to identify priority research questions with a focus on the UK food system (though the outcomes may be broadly applicable to other developed nations). Emphasis was placed on incorporating a wide range of perspectives ('world views') from different stakeholder groups: policy, private sector, non-governmental organisations, advocacy groups and academia. A total of 456 individuals submitted 820 questions from which 100 were selected by a process of online voting and a three-stage workshop voting exercise. These 100 final questions were sorted into 10 themes and the 'top' question for each theme identified by a further voting exercise. This step also allowed four different stakeholder groups to select the top 7-8 questions from their perspectives. Results of these voting exercises are presented. It is clear from the wide range of questions prioritised in this exercise that the different stakeholder groups identified specific research needs on a range of post-farm gate activities and food security outcomes. Evidence needs related to food affordability, nutrition and food safety (all key elements of food security) featured highly in the exercise. While there were some questions relating to climate impacts on production, other important topics for food security (e.g. trade, transport, preference and cultural needs) were not viewed as strongly by the participants.

KW - food security

KW - UKfood system

KW - post-farmgate activities

KW - stakeholder world views

KW - priority setting

KW - evidence gaps

KW - climate-change

KW - personalized nutrition

KW - future

KW - security

KW - diet

KW - agriculture

KW - health

KW - waste

U2 - 10.1007/s12571-013-0294-4

DO - 10.1007/s12571-013-0294-4

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 617

EP - 636

JO - Food Security

JF - Food Security

SN - 1876-4517

IS - 5

ER -