Processing emotional stimuli

comparison of saccadic and manual choice-reaction times

Rachel L. Bannerman, Maarten Milders, Arash Sahraie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared the speed of discrimination for emotional and neutral faces in four experiments, using a forced-choice saccadic and manual reaction time task.Unmasked, brief (20 ms) bilateral presentation of schematic (Exp. 1) or naturalistic
(Exp. 2) emotional/neutral face pairs, led to shorter discrimination of emotional stimuli in saccadic localisation task. When the effect of interference from emotional stimuli is ruled out by showing a pairing of the emotional or neutral face with an
outline face, faster saccadic discrimination was obtained for fearful facial expression only (Exp. 3). The manual discrimination reaction time was not significantly different for emotional versus neutral stimuli. To explore the absence
of a manual RTeffect we manipulated the stimulus duration (20 ms vs. 500 ms: Exp.4). Faster saccadic discrimination of emotional stimuli was observed at both durations. For manual responses, emotional bias was observed only at the longest
duration (500 ms). Overall, comparison of saccadic and manual responses shows that faster discrimination of emotional/neutral stimuli can be carried out within the oculomotor system. In addition, emotional stimuli are processed preferentially to
neutral face stimuli.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)930-954
Number of pages25
JournalCognition & Emotion
Volume23
Issue number5
Early online date9 Jul 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jul 2009

Fingerprint

Facial Expression
Emotion
Stimulus
Reaction Time
Discrimination
Stimulus Duration
Emotional Response
Experiment
Localization
Interference

Cite this

Processing emotional stimuli : comparison of saccadic and manual choice-reaction times. / Bannerman, Rachel L.; Milders, Maarten; Sahraie, Arash.

In: Cognition & Emotion, Vol. 23, No. 5, 23.07.2009, p. 930-954.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bannerman, Rachel L. ; Milders, Maarten ; Sahraie, Arash. / Processing emotional stimuli : comparison of saccadic and manual choice-reaction times. In: Cognition & Emotion. 2009 ; Vol. 23, No. 5. pp. 930-954.
@article{9a34e895cd514813b9e280df3cf87007,
title = "Processing emotional stimuli: comparison of saccadic and manual choice-reaction times",
abstract = "We compared the speed of discrimination for emotional and neutral faces in four experiments, using a forced-choice saccadic and manual reaction time task.Unmasked, brief (20 ms) bilateral presentation of schematic (Exp. 1) or naturalistic (Exp. 2) emotional/neutral face pairs, led to shorter discrimination of emotional stimuli in saccadic localisation task. When the effect of interference from emotional stimuli is ruled out by showing a pairing of the emotional or neutral face with an outline face, faster saccadic discrimination was obtained for fearful facial expression only (Exp. 3). The manual discrimination reaction time was not significantly different for emotional versus neutral stimuli. To explore the absence of a manual RTeffect we manipulated the stimulus duration (20 ms vs. 500 ms: Exp.4). Faster saccadic discrimination of emotional stimuli was observed at both durations. For manual responses, emotional bias was observed only at the longest duration (500 ms). Overall, comparison of saccadic and manual responses shows that faster discrimination of emotional/neutral stimuli can be carried out within the oculomotor system. In addition, emotional stimuli are processed preferentially to neutral face stimuli.",
author = "Bannerman, {Rachel L.} and Maarten Milders and Arash Sahraie",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1080/02699930802243303",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "930--954",
journal = "Cognition & Emotion",
issn = "0269-9931",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Processing emotional stimuli

T2 - comparison of saccadic and manual choice-reaction times

AU - Bannerman, Rachel L.

AU - Milders, Maarten

AU - Sahraie, Arash

PY - 2009/7/23

Y1 - 2009/7/23

N2 - We compared the speed of discrimination for emotional and neutral faces in four experiments, using a forced-choice saccadic and manual reaction time task.Unmasked, brief (20 ms) bilateral presentation of schematic (Exp. 1) or naturalistic (Exp. 2) emotional/neutral face pairs, led to shorter discrimination of emotional stimuli in saccadic localisation task. When the effect of interference from emotional stimuli is ruled out by showing a pairing of the emotional or neutral face with an outline face, faster saccadic discrimination was obtained for fearful facial expression only (Exp. 3). The manual discrimination reaction time was not significantly different for emotional versus neutral stimuli. To explore the absence of a manual RTeffect we manipulated the stimulus duration (20 ms vs. 500 ms: Exp.4). Faster saccadic discrimination of emotional stimuli was observed at both durations. For manual responses, emotional bias was observed only at the longest duration (500 ms). Overall, comparison of saccadic and manual responses shows that faster discrimination of emotional/neutral stimuli can be carried out within the oculomotor system. In addition, emotional stimuli are processed preferentially to neutral face stimuli.

AB - We compared the speed of discrimination for emotional and neutral faces in four experiments, using a forced-choice saccadic and manual reaction time task.Unmasked, brief (20 ms) bilateral presentation of schematic (Exp. 1) or naturalistic (Exp. 2) emotional/neutral face pairs, led to shorter discrimination of emotional stimuli in saccadic localisation task. When the effect of interference from emotional stimuli is ruled out by showing a pairing of the emotional or neutral face with an outline face, faster saccadic discrimination was obtained for fearful facial expression only (Exp. 3). The manual discrimination reaction time was not significantly different for emotional versus neutral stimuli. To explore the absence of a manual RTeffect we manipulated the stimulus duration (20 ms vs. 500 ms: Exp.4). Faster saccadic discrimination of emotional stimuli was observed at both durations. For manual responses, emotional bias was observed only at the longest duration (500 ms). Overall, comparison of saccadic and manual responses shows that faster discrimination of emotional/neutral stimuli can be carried out within the oculomotor system. In addition, emotional stimuli are processed preferentially to neutral face stimuli.

U2 - 10.1080/02699930802243303

DO - 10.1080/02699930802243303

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 930

EP - 954

JO - Cognition & Emotion

JF - Cognition & Emotion

SN - 0269-9931

IS - 5

ER -