Progesterone for premenstrual syndrome

Olive Ford*, Anne Lethaby, Helen Roberts, Ben Willem J. Mol

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: About 5% of women experience severe symptoms called premenstrual syndrome (PMS), only in the two weeks before their menstrual periods. Treatment with progesteronemay restore a deficiency, balance menstrual hormone levels or reduce effects of falling progesterone levels on the brain or on electrolytes in the blood. Objectives: The objectives were to determine if progesterone has been found to be an effective treatment for all or some premenstrual symptoms and if adverse events associated with this treatment have been reported. Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to 2005) and EMBASE (1980 to 2005) in March 2005, and PsycINFO (1806 to 2006) in April 2006. We contacted pharmaceutical companies for information about unpublished trials. The Trials Search Co-ordinator searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycLIT on October 16 2000. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched again on March 1 2005 and all again on March 3 2008. CINAHL was searched on March 3 2008. The search strings are in Appendix 2. Selection criteria: We included randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of progesterone on women with PMS diagnosed by at least two prospective cycles, without current psychiatric disorder. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers (BM and OF) extracted data independently and decided which trials to include. OF wrote to trial investigators for missing data. Main results: From 17 studies, only two met our inclusion criteria. Together they had 280 participants aged between 18 and 45 years. One hundred and fifteen yielded analysable results. Both studies measured symptom severity using subjective scales. Differing in design, participants, dose of progesterone and how delivered, the studies could not be combined in meta-analysis. Adverse events which may or may not have been side effects of the treatment were described as mild. Both trials had defects. They intended to exclude women whose symptoms continued after their periods. When data from ineligible women were excluded from analysis in one trial, the other women were found to have benefited more from progesterone than placebo. The smaller study found no statistically significant difference between oral progesterone, vaginally absorbed progesterone and placebo, but reported outcomes incompletely. Authors' conclusions: The trials did not show that progesterone is an effective treatment for PMS nor that it is not. Neither trial distinguished a subgroup of women who benefited, nor examined claimed success with high doses.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberCD003415
JournalCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Sep 2009

Keywords

  • Female
  • Humans
  • Premenstrual syndrome [*prevention & control]
  • Progesterone [adverse effects; *therapeutic use]
  • Progestins [*therapeutic use]
  • Randomized controlled trials as topic

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Progesterone for premenstrual syndrome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this