Property Rights and the Duty to Extend Human Life

Tony Milligan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines what the author calls the ‘argument from duty’, i.e. the argument that we should recognize private property rights in space because doing so will help us to act upon our duty to ensure the future survival of humanity. More strongly, the motivational impact of recognizing such rights may be required if we are to act upon this duty in an effective manner. The article argues that the duty in question is important but not overriding and that there are other duties with which it may happen to conflict. More specifically, the practical requirements of human resettlement may conflict with our duty to pursue a more just and environmentally sensitive way of living here on Earth. If this is correct, only a significantly weakened argument from duty may be made. The article also strengthens the case for thinking about our duties in the light of other ethical considerations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)190-193
Number of pages4
JournalSpace Policy
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

property rights
right of ownership
requirements
private property
resettlement
conflict
Property rights
rights

Cite this

Property Rights and the Duty to Extend Human Life. / Milligan, Tony.

In: Space Policy, Vol. 27, No. 4, 11.2011, p. 190-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Milligan, Tony. / Property Rights and the Duty to Extend Human Life. In: Space Policy. 2011 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 190-193.
@article{63dd867e754044d794784f6d7944fe03,
title = "Property Rights and the Duty to Extend Human Life",
abstract = "This article examines what the author calls the ‘argument from duty’, i.e. the argument that we should recognize private property rights in space because doing so will help us to act upon our duty to ensure the future survival of humanity. More strongly, the motivational impact of recognizing such rights may be required if we are to act upon this duty in an effective manner. The article argues that the duty in question is important but not overriding and that there are other duties with which it may happen to conflict. More specifically, the practical requirements of human resettlement may conflict with our duty to pursue a more just and environmentally sensitive way of living here on Earth. If this is correct, only a significantly weakened argument from duty may be made. The article also strengthens the case for thinking about our duties in the light of other ethical considerations.",
author = "Tony Milligan",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.spacepol.2011.07.004",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "190--193",
journal = "Space Policy",
issn = "0265-9646",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Property Rights and the Duty to Extend Human Life

AU - Milligan, Tony

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - This article examines what the author calls the ‘argument from duty’, i.e. the argument that we should recognize private property rights in space because doing so will help us to act upon our duty to ensure the future survival of humanity. More strongly, the motivational impact of recognizing such rights may be required if we are to act upon this duty in an effective manner. The article argues that the duty in question is important but not overriding and that there are other duties with which it may happen to conflict. More specifically, the practical requirements of human resettlement may conflict with our duty to pursue a more just and environmentally sensitive way of living here on Earth. If this is correct, only a significantly weakened argument from duty may be made. The article also strengthens the case for thinking about our duties in the light of other ethical considerations.

AB - This article examines what the author calls the ‘argument from duty’, i.e. the argument that we should recognize private property rights in space because doing so will help us to act upon our duty to ensure the future survival of humanity. More strongly, the motivational impact of recognizing such rights may be required if we are to act upon this duty in an effective manner. The article argues that the duty in question is important but not overriding and that there are other duties with which it may happen to conflict. More specifically, the practical requirements of human resettlement may conflict with our duty to pursue a more just and environmentally sensitive way of living here on Earth. If this is correct, only a significantly weakened argument from duty may be made. The article also strengthens the case for thinking about our duties in the light of other ethical considerations.

U2 - 10.1016/j.spacepol.2011.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.spacepol.2011.07.004

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 190

EP - 193

JO - Space Policy

JF - Space Policy

SN - 0265-9646

IS - 4

ER -