Prospective memory reminders: a laboratory investigation of initiation source and age effects

Julie D Henry, Peter G Rendell, Louise H Phillips, Leigh Dunlop, Matthias Kliegel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior research indicates that, in some circumstances, reminders may facilitate prospective remembering. However, it remains unclear whether this effect is dependent on the initiation source (self vs. external), whether it is moderated by task type (event vs. time based), or whether the provision of standardized reminders particularly benefits older adults. In the current study, young (n¿=¿48) and older adults (n¿=¿47) were tested on a laboratory-based prospective memory task in which they encountered three counterbalanced reminder conditions: no reminders, self-initiated reminders, and experimenter-initiated reminders. The results indicated that while the provision of reminders enhanced prospective memory performance, no difference was seen between self-initiated and experimenter-initiated reminder conditions, nor was there any interaction with age or prospective memory type (event vs. time based). These data support the role of both self- and externally generated external reminders as an aid to prospective remembering. However, the absence of any interaction with age is not consistent with theoretical models of ageing that consider the provision of such reminders to reduce strategic demands (or increase automatic processing).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1274-1287
Number of pages14
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume65
Issue number7
Early online date10 Apr 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Episodic Memory
Theoretical Models
Research

Keywords

  • young adult
  • analysis of variance
  • humans
  • aging
  • aged
  • mental recall
  • user-computer interface
  • photic stimulation
  • memory, episodic
  • aged, 80 and over
  • adult
  • cues
  • intention
  • neuropsychological tests
  • adolescent
  • female
  • male

Cite this

Prospective memory reminders : a laboratory investigation of initiation source and age effects. / Henry, Julie D; Rendell, Peter G; Phillips, Louise H; Dunlop, Leigh; Kliegel, Matthias.

In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 65, No. 7, 07.2012, p. 1274-1287.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Henry, Julie D ; Rendell, Peter G ; Phillips, Louise H ; Dunlop, Leigh ; Kliegel, Matthias. / Prospective memory reminders : a laboratory investigation of initiation source and age effects. In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2012 ; Vol. 65, No. 7. pp. 1274-1287.
@article{e3f67d1d81904d0cb047467d6bf12753,
title = "Prospective memory reminders: a laboratory investigation of initiation source and age effects",
abstract = "Prior research indicates that, in some circumstances, reminders may facilitate prospective remembering. However, it remains unclear whether this effect is dependent on the initiation source (self vs. external), whether it is moderated by task type (event vs. time based), or whether the provision of standardized reminders particularly benefits older adults. In the current study, young (n¿=¿48) and older adults (n¿=¿47) were tested on a laboratory-based prospective memory task in which they encountered three counterbalanced reminder conditions: no reminders, self-initiated reminders, and experimenter-initiated reminders. The results indicated that while the provision of reminders enhanced prospective memory performance, no difference was seen between self-initiated and experimenter-initiated reminder conditions, nor was there any interaction with age or prospective memory type (event vs. time based). These data support the role of both self- and externally generated external reminders as an aid to prospective remembering. However, the absence of any interaction with age is not consistent with theoretical models of ageing that consider the provision of such reminders to reduce strategic demands (or increase automatic processing).",
keywords = "young adult, analysis of variance, humans, aging, aged, mental recall, user-computer interface, photic stimulation, memory, episodic, aged, 80 and over, adult, cues, intention, neuropsychological tests, adolescent, female, male",
author = "Henry, {Julie D} and Rendell, {Peter G} and Phillips, {Louise H} and Leigh Dunlop and Matthias Kliegel",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/17470218.2011.651091",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "1274--1287",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1747-0218",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective memory reminders

T2 - a laboratory investigation of initiation source and age effects

AU - Henry, Julie D

AU - Rendell, Peter G

AU - Phillips, Louise H

AU - Dunlop, Leigh

AU - Kliegel, Matthias

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Prior research indicates that, in some circumstances, reminders may facilitate prospective remembering. However, it remains unclear whether this effect is dependent on the initiation source (self vs. external), whether it is moderated by task type (event vs. time based), or whether the provision of standardized reminders particularly benefits older adults. In the current study, young (n¿=¿48) and older adults (n¿=¿47) were tested on a laboratory-based prospective memory task in which they encountered three counterbalanced reminder conditions: no reminders, self-initiated reminders, and experimenter-initiated reminders. The results indicated that while the provision of reminders enhanced prospective memory performance, no difference was seen between self-initiated and experimenter-initiated reminder conditions, nor was there any interaction with age or prospective memory type (event vs. time based). These data support the role of both self- and externally generated external reminders as an aid to prospective remembering. However, the absence of any interaction with age is not consistent with theoretical models of ageing that consider the provision of such reminders to reduce strategic demands (or increase automatic processing).

AB - Prior research indicates that, in some circumstances, reminders may facilitate prospective remembering. However, it remains unclear whether this effect is dependent on the initiation source (self vs. external), whether it is moderated by task type (event vs. time based), or whether the provision of standardized reminders particularly benefits older adults. In the current study, young (n¿=¿48) and older adults (n¿=¿47) were tested on a laboratory-based prospective memory task in which they encountered three counterbalanced reminder conditions: no reminders, self-initiated reminders, and experimenter-initiated reminders. The results indicated that while the provision of reminders enhanced prospective memory performance, no difference was seen between self-initiated and experimenter-initiated reminder conditions, nor was there any interaction with age or prospective memory type (event vs. time based). These data support the role of both self- and externally generated external reminders as an aid to prospective remembering. However, the absence of any interaction with age is not consistent with theoretical models of ageing that consider the provision of such reminders to reduce strategic demands (or increase automatic processing).

KW - young adult

KW - analysis of variance

KW - humans

KW - aging

KW - aged

KW - mental recall

KW - user-computer interface

KW - photic stimulation

KW - memory, episodic

KW - aged, 80 and over

KW - adult

KW - cues

KW - intention

KW - neuropsychological tests

KW - adolescent

KW - female

KW - male

U2 - 10.1080/17470218.2011.651091

DO - 10.1080/17470218.2011.651091

M3 - Article

C2 - 22489707

VL - 65

SP - 1274

EP - 1287

JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 1747-0218

IS - 7

ER -