Prospective Study of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Surgeries for Central Compartment Pelvic Organ Prolapse

R. Kung, M. Phatak, M. Hair, M. Abdel-Fattah, W. Agur

Research output: Contribution to journalAbstract

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Surgical correction of central compartment prolapse with vaginal approach (sacrospinous fixation) has been shown to have risks of chronic pelvic pain and recurrent cystocoele. Vaginally-assisted laparoscopic sacrohystero/colpopexy (VALS) is a relatively new procedure using prolene mesh sutured vaginally and picked up laparoscopically for promotofixation.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberICS 2014 364
Pages (from-to)818-819
Number of pages2
JournalNeurourology and Urodynamics
Volume33
Issue number6
Early online date7 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014
Event44th Annual Meeting of the International-Continence-Society (ICS) - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Duration: 20 Oct 201424 Oct 2014

Cite this