Protein futures for Western Europe: potential land use and climate impacts in 2050

Elin Röös, Bojana Bajželj, Pete Smith, Mikaela Patel, David Little, Tara Garnett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multiple production and demand side measures are needed to improve food system sustainability. This study quantified the theoretical minimum agricultural land requirements to supply Western Europe with food in 2050 from its own land base, together with GHG emissions arising. Assuming that crop yield gaps in agriculture are closed, livestock production efficiencies increased and waste at all stages reduced, a range of food consumption scenarios were modelled each based on different ‘protein futures’. The scenarios were as follows: intensive and efficient livestock production using today’s species mix; intensive efficient poultry–dairy production; intensive efficient aquaculture–dairy; artificial meat and dairy; livestock on ‘ecological leftovers’ (livestock reared only on land unsuited to cropping, agricultural residues and food waste, with consumption capped at that level of availability); and a ‘plant-based eating’ scenario. For each scenario, ‘projected diet’ and ‘healthy diet’ variants were modelled. Finally, we quantified the theoretical maximum carbon sequestration potential from afforestation of spared agricultural land. Results indicate that land use could be cut by 14–86 % and GHG emissions reduced by up to approximately 90 %. The yearly carbon storage potential arising from spared agricultural land ranged from 90 to 700 Mt CO2 in 2050. The artificial meat and plant-based scenarios achieved the greatest land use and GHG reductions and the greatest carbon sequestration potential. The ‘ecological leftover’ scenario required the least cropland as compared with the other meat-containing scenarios, but all available pasture was used, and GHG emissions were higher if meat consumption was not capped at healthy levels.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)367–377
Number of pages11
JournalRegional Environmental Change
Volume17
Issue number2
Early online date6 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

climate effect
meat
carbon sequestration
land use
protein
agricultural land
livestock farming
food
livestock
diet
food consumption
afforestation
crop yield
cropping practice
pasture
sustainability
agriculture
Western Europe
land
consumption

Keywords

  • Climate
  • Dietary change
  • Food
  • Land use
  • Mitigation
  • Protein

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change

Cite this

Protein futures for Western Europe : potential land use and climate impacts in 2050. / Röös, Elin; Bajželj, Bojana; Smith, Pete; Patel, Mikaela; Little, David; Garnett, Tara.

In: Regional Environmental Change, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 367–377.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Röös, Elin ; Bajželj, Bojana ; Smith, Pete ; Patel, Mikaela ; Little, David ; Garnett, Tara. / Protein futures for Western Europe : potential land use and climate impacts in 2050. In: Regional Environmental Change. 2017 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 367–377.
@article{5ef848c9e63340dbbe6c38b2f82ba1a7,
title = "Protein futures for Western Europe: potential land use and climate impacts in 2050",
abstract = "Multiple production and demand side measures are needed to improve food system sustainability. This study quantified the theoretical minimum agricultural land requirements to supply Western Europe with food in 2050 from its own land base, together with GHG emissions arising. Assuming that crop yield gaps in agriculture are closed, livestock production efficiencies increased and waste at all stages reduced, a range of food consumption scenarios were modelled each based on different ‘protein futures’. The scenarios were as follows: intensive and efficient livestock production using today’s species mix; intensive efficient poultry–dairy production; intensive efficient aquaculture–dairy; artificial meat and dairy; livestock on ‘ecological leftovers’ (livestock reared only on land unsuited to cropping, agricultural residues and food waste, with consumption capped at that level of availability); and a ‘plant-based eating’ scenario. For each scenario, ‘projected diet’ and ‘healthy diet’ variants were modelled. Finally, we quantified the theoretical maximum carbon sequestration potential from afforestation of spared agricultural land. Results indicate that land use could be cut by 14–86 {\%} and GHG emissions reduced by up to approximately 90 {\%}. The yearly carbon storage potential arising from spared agricultural land ranged from 90 to 700 Mt CO2 in 2050. The artificial meat and plant-based scenarios achieved the greatest land use and GHG reductions and the greatest carbon sequestration potential. The ‘ecological leftover’ scenario required the least cropland as compared with the other meat-containing scenarios, but all available pasture was used, and GHG emissions were higher if meat consumption was not capped at healthy levels.",
keywords = "Climate, Dietary change, Food, Land use, Mitigation, Protein",
author = "Elin R{\"o}{\"o}s and Bojana Bajželj and Pete Smith and Mikaela Patel and David Little and Tara Garnett",
note = "Acknowledgments Our thanks to the Future Agriculture initiative at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) for funding the development of the model used to perform the calculations.",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10113-016-1013-4",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "367–377",
journal = "Regional Environmental Change",
issn = "1436-3798",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protein futures for Western Europe

T2 - potential land use and climate impacts in 2050

AU - Röös, Elin

AU - Bajželj, Bojana

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - Patel, Mikaela

AU - Little, David

AU - Garnett, Tara

N1 - Acknowledgments Our thanks to the Future Agriculture initiative at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) for funding the development of the model used to perform the calculations.

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Multiple production and demand side measures are needed to improve food system sustainability. This study quantified the theoretical minimum agricultural land requirements to supply Western Europe with food in 2050 from its own land base, together with GHG emissions arising. Assuming that crop yield gaps in agriculture are closed, livestock production efficiencies increased and waste at all stages reduced, a range of food consumption scenarios were modelled each based on different ‘protein futures’. The scenarios were as follows: intensive and efficient livestock production using today’s species mix; intensive efficient poultry–dairy production; intensive efficient aquaculture–dairy; artificial meat and dairy; livestock on ‘ecological leftovers’ (livestock reared only on land unsuited to cropping, agricultural residues and food waste, with consumption capped at that level of availability); and a ‘plant-based eating’ scenario. For each scenario, ‘projected diet’ and ‘healthy diet’ variants were modelled. Finally, we quantified the theoretical maximum carbon sequestration potential from afforestation of spared agricultural land. Results indicate that land use could be cut by 14–86 % and GHG emissions reduced by up to approximately 90 %. The yearly carbon storage potential arising from spared agricultural land ranged from 90 to 700 Mt CO2 in 2050. The artificial meat and plant-based scenarios achieved the greatest land use and GHG reductions and the greatest carbon sequestration potential. The ‘ecological leftover’ scenario required the least cropland as compared with the other meat-containing scenarios, but all available pasture was used, and GHG emissions were higher if meat consumption was not capped at healthy levels.

AB - Multiple production and demand side measures are needed to improve food system sustainability. This study quantified the theoretical minimum agricultural land requirements to supply Western Europe with food in 2050 from its own land base, together with GHG emissions arising. Assuming that crop yield gaps in agriculture are closed, livestock production efficiencies increased and waste at all stages reduced, a range of food consumption scenarios were modelled each based on different ‘protein futures’. The scenarios were as follows: intensive and efficient livestock production using today’s species mix; intensive efficient poultry–dairy production; intensive efficient aquaculture–dairy; artificial meat and dairy; livestock on ‘ecological leftovers’ (livestock reared only on land unsuited to cropping, agricultural residues and food waste, with consumption capped at that level of availability); and a ‘plant-based eating’ scenario. For each scenario, ‘projected diet’ and ‘healthy diet’ variants were modelled. Finally, we quantified the theoretical maximum carbon sequestration potential from afforestation of spared agricultural land. Results indicate that land use could be cut by 14–86 % and GHG emissions reduced by up to approximately 90 %. The yearly carbon storage potential arising from spared agricultural land ranged from 90 to 700 Mt CO2 in 2050. The artificial meat and plant-based scenarios achieved the greatest land use and GHG reductions and the greatest carbon sequestration potential. The ‘ecological leftover’ scenario required the least cropland as compared with the other meat-containing scenarios, but all available pasture was used, and GHG emissions were higher if meat consumption was not capped at healthy levels.

KW - Climate

KW - Dietary change

KW - Food

KW - Land use

KW - Mitigation

KW - Protein

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978123737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10113-016-1013-4

DO - 10.1007/s10113-016-1013-4

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 367

EP - 377

JO - Regional Environmental Change

JF - Regional Environmental Change

SN - 1436-3798

IS - 2

ER -