Protein Valuation in Food Choice Is Positively Associated with Lean Mass in Older Adults

Charlotte M Buckley* (Corresponding Author), Sophie Austin, Bernard M Corfe, Mark A Green, Alexandra M Johnstone, Emma J Stevenson, Elizabeth A Williams, Jeffrey M Brunstrom

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Calorie for calorie, protein is more satiating than carbohydrate or fat. However, it remains unclear whether humans perceive calories derived from these macronutrients equally and whether lean mass is associated with a tendency to "value" protein when dietary decisions are made.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the test-retest reliability of a novel method for quantifying macronutrient valuations in human volunteers and to determine whether "protein valuation" is associated with a higher fat-free mass index (FFMI) in older adults.

METHODS: A 2-alternative, forced-choice task in which 25 foods were compared in 300 trials was undertaken in 2 studies. In study 1, participants (age range 19-71 y, n = 92) attended 2 test sessions, spaced 1 wk apart. In study 2, older adults (age range 40-85 y; n = 91) completed the food-choice task and assessed the test foods for liking, expected satiety, and perceived healthiness. Body composition and habitual protein intake were assessed in both studies. Data were analyzed through the use of individual binomial logistic regressions and multilevel binomial logistic regressions.

RESULTS: In study 1, measures of macronutrient valuation showed excellent test-retest reliability; responses in the forced-choice task were highly correlated (week 1 compared with week 2; protein, r = 0.83, P < 0.001; carbohydrate, r = 0.90, P < 0.001; fat, r = 0.90, P < 0.001). Calorie for calorie, protein and carbohydrate were stronger predictors of choice than fat (P < 0.001). In study 2, protein was a stronger predictor than both carbohydrate (P = 0.039) and fat (P = 0.003), and a positive interaction was observed between protein valuation and FFMI (OR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.38, 1.95; P < 0.001). This was the case after controlling for age, gender, liking for foods, and habitual protein consumption.

CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings demonstrate that adult humans value calories derived from protein, carbohydrate, and fat differently, and that the tendency to value protein is associated with greater lean mass in older adults.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2056-2064
Number of pages9
JournalThe Journal of Nutrition
Volume149
Issue number11
Early online date14 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Food
Fats
Proteins
Carbohydrates
Reproducibility of Results
Logistic Models
Dietary Proteins
Body Composition
varespladib methyl
Volunteers

Keywords

  • protein valuation
  • sarcopenia
  • food choice
  • body composition
  • fat-free mass index
  • lean mass
  • aging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Buckley, C. M., Austin, S., Corfe, B. M., Green, M. A., Johnstone, A. M., Stevenson, E. J., ... Brunstrom, J. M. (2019). Protein Valuation in Food Choice Is Positively Associated with Lean Mass in Older Adults. The Journal of Nutrition, 149(11), 2056-2064. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxz124

Protein Valuation in Food Choice Is Positively Associated with Lean Mass in Older Adults. / Buckley, Charlotte M (Corresponding Author); Austin, Sophie; Corfe, Bernard M; Green, Mark A; Johnstone, Alexandra M; Stevenson, Emma J; Williams, Elizabeth A; Brunstrom, Jeffrey M.

In: The Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 149, No. 11, 01.11.2019, p. 2056-2064.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buckley, CM, Austin, S, Corfe, BM, Green, MA, Johnstone, AM, Stevenson, EJ, Williams, EA & Brunstrom, JM 2019, 'Protein Valuation in Food Choice Is Positively Associated with Lean Mass in Older Adults', The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 149, no. 11, pp. 2056-2064. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxz124
Buckley, Charlotte M ; Austin, Sophie ; Corfe, Bernard M ; Green, Mark A ; Johnstone, Alexandra M ; Stevenson, Emma J ; Williams, Elizabeth A ; Brunstrom, Jeffrey M. / Protein Valuation in Food Choice Is Positively Associated with Lean Mass in Older Adults. In: The Journal of Nutrition. 2019 ; Vol. 149, No. 11. pp. 2056-2064.
@article{db98f06f2aaf4f94b50c22fa0700851c,
title = "Protein Valuation in Food Choice Is Positively Associated with Lean Mass in Older Adults",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Calorie for calorie, protein is more satiating than carbohydrate or fat. However, it remains unclear whether humans perceive calories derived from these macronutrients equally and whether lean mass is associated with a tendency to {"}value{"} protein when dietary decisions are made.OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the test-retest reliability of a novel method for quantifying macronutrient valuations in human volunteers and to determine whether {"}protein valuation{"} is associated with a higher fat-free mass index (FFMI) in older adults.METHODS: A 2-alternative, forced-choice task in which 25 foods were compared in 300 trials was undertaken in 2 studies. In study 1, participants (age range 19-71 y, n = 92) attended 2 test sessions, spaced 1 wk apart. In study 2, older adults (age range 40-85 y; n = 91) completed the food-choice task and assessed the test foods for liking, expected satiety, and perceived healthiness. Body composition and habitual protein intake were assessed in both studies. Data were analyzed through the use of individual binomial logistic regressions and multilevel binomial logistic regressions.RESULTS: In study 1, measures of macronutrient valuation showed excellent test-retest reliability; responses in the forced-choice task were highly correlated (week 1 compared with week 2; protein, r = 0.83, P < 0.001; carbohydrate, r = 0.90, P < 0.001; fat, r = 0.90, P < 0.001). Calorie for calorie, protein and carbohydrate were stronger predictors of choice than fat (P < 0.001). In study 2, protein was a stronger predictor than both carbohydrate (P = 0.039) and fat (P = 0.003), and a positive interaction was observed between protein valuation and FFMI (OR = 1.64; 95{\%} CI: 1.38, 1.95; P < 0.001). This was the case after controlling for age, gender, liking for foods, and habitual protein consumption.CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings demonstrate that adult humans value calories derived from protein, carbohydrate, and fat differently, and that the tendency to value protein is associated with greater lean mass in older adults.",
keywords = "protein valuation, sarcopenia, food choice, body composition, fat-free mass index, lean mass, aging",
author = "Buckley, {Charlotte M} and Sophie Austin and Corfe, {Bernard M} and Green, {Mark A} and Johnstone, {Alexandra M} and Stevenson, {Emma J} and Williams, {Elizabeth A} and Brunstrom, {Jeffrey M}",
note = "Acknowledgments The authors’ responsibilities were as follows—CMB and SA: collected the data; CMB: analyzed the data; CMB and JMB: wrote the manuscript; and all authors: designed the study, interpreted the data, critically revised the manuscript, and read and approved the final manuscript. Funded by the Research Councils UK “Priming Food Partnerships” initiative supported by BBSRC, MRC, EPSRC, and ESRC (project reference BB/P023886/1).",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jn/nxz124",
language = "English",
volume = "149",
pages = "2056--2064",
journal = "The Journal of Nutrition",
issn = "0022-3166",
publisher = "American Society for Nutrition",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protein Valuation in Food Choice Is Positively Associated with Lean Mass in Older Adults

AU - Buckley, Charlotte M

AU - Austin, Sophie

AU - Corfe, Bernard M

AU - Green, Mark A

AU - Johnstone, Alexandra M

AU - Stevenson, Emma J

AU - Williams, Elizabeth A

AU - Brunstrom, Jeffrey M

N1 - Acknowledgments The authors’ responsibilities were as follows—CMB and SA: collected the data; CMB: analyzed the data; CMB and JMB: wrote the manuscript; and all authors: designed the study, interpreted the data, critically revised the manuscript, and read and approved the final manuscript. Funded by the Research Councils UK “Priming Food Partnerships” initiative supported by BBSRC, MRC, EPSRC, and ESRC (project reference BB/P023886/1).

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Calorie for calorie, protein is more satiating than carbohydrate or fat. However, it remains unclear whether humans perceive calories derived from these macronutrients equally and whether lean mass is associated with a tendency to "value" protein when dietary decisions are made.OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the test-retest reliability of a novel method for quantifying macronutrient valuations in human volunteers and to determine whether "protein valuation" is associated with a higher fat-free mass index (FFMI) in older adults.METHODS: A 2-alternative, forced-choice task in which 25 foods were compared in 300 trials was undertaken in 2 studies. In study 1, participants (age range 19-71 y, n = 92) attended 2 test sessions, spaced 1 wk apart. In study 2, older adults (age range 40-85 y; n = 91) completed the food-choice task and assessed the test foods for liking, expected satiety, and perceived healthiness. Body composition and habitual protein intake were assessed in both studies. Data were analyzed through the use of individual binomial logistic regressions and multilevel binomial logistic regressions.RESULTS: In study 1, measures of macronutrient valuation showed excellent test-retest reliability; responses in the forced-choice task were highly correlated (week 1 compared with week 2; protein, r = 0.83, P < 0.001; carbohydrate, r = 0.90, P < 0.001; fat, r = 0.90, P < 0.001). Calorie for calorie, protein and carbohydrate were stronger predictors of choice than fat (P < 0.001). In study 2, protein was a stronger predictor than both carbohydrate (P = 0.039) and fat (P = 0.003), and a positive interaction was observed between protein valuation and FFMI (OR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.38, 1.95; P < 0.001). This was the case after controlling for age, gender, liking for foods, and habitual protein consumption.CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings demonstrate that adult humans value calories derived from protein, carbohydrate, and fat differently, and that the tendency to value protein is associated with greater lean mass in older adults.

AB - BACKGROUND: Calorie for calorie, protein is more satiating than carbohydrate or fat. However, it remains unclear whether humans perceive calories derived from these macronutrients equally and whether lean mass is associated with a tendency to "value" protein when dietary decisions are made.OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine the test-retest reliability of a novel method for quantifying macronutrient valuations in human volunteers and to determine whether "protein valuation" is associated with a higher fat-free mass index (FFMI) in older adults.METHODS: A 2-alternative, forced-choice task in which 25 foods were compared in 300 trials was undertaken in 2 studies. In study 1, participants (age range 19-71 y, n = 92) attended 2 test sessions, spaced 1 wk apart. In study 2, older adults (age range 40-85 y; n = 91) completed the food-choice task and assessed the test foods for liking, expected satiety, and perceived healthiness. Body composition and habitual protein intake were assessed in both studies. Data were analyzed through the use of individual binomial logistic regressions and multilevel binomial logistic regressions.RESULTS: In study 1, measures of macronutrient valuation showed excellent test-retest reliability; responses in the forced-choice task were highly correlated (week 1 compared with week 2; protein, r = 0.83, P < 0.001; carbohydrate, r = 0.90, P < 0.001; fat, r = 0.90, P < 0.001). Calorie for calorie, protein and carbohydrate were stronger predictors of choice than fat (P < 0.001). In study 2, protein was a stronger predictor than both carbohydrate (P = 0.039) and fat (P = 0.003), and a positive interaction was observed between protein valuation and FFMI (OR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.38, 1.95; P < 0.001). This was the case after controlling for age, gender, liking for foods, and habitual protein consumption.CONCLUSIONS: Together, these findings demonstrate that adult humans value calories derived from protein, carbohydrate, and fat differently, and that the tendency to value protein is associated with greater lean mass in older adults.

KW - protein valuation

KW - sarcopenia

KW - food choice

KW - body composition

KW - fat-free mass index

KW - lean mass

KW - aging

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/protein-valuation-food-choice-positively-associated-lean-mass-older-adults

UR - https://abdn.pure.elsevier.com/en/en/researchoutput/protein-valuation-in-food-choice-is-positively-associated-with-lean-mass-in-older-adults(db98f06f-2aaf-4f94-b50c-22fa0700851c).html

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074446321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jn/nxz124

DO - 10.1093/jn/nxz124

M3 - Article

C2 - 31198945

VL - 149

SP - 2056

EP - 2064

JO - The Journal of Nutrition

JF - The Journal of Nutrition

SN - 0022-3166

IS - 11

ER -