Providing cancer services to remote and rural areas: consensus study

Lesley Ann Stevenson, Neil Crawford Campbell, Peter Alexander Kiehlmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is controversy about how cancer care should be provided to patients in remote and rural areas. The aim of this project was to measure consensus among health professionals who treat rural patients with cancer about priorities for cancer care. A modified Delphi process was used. Of 78 health professionals in Grampian, 62 responded (79%). Of 49 items suggested, there was agreement on 26 (53%), encompassing fast access to diagnosis, high-quality specialist treatment, and well-coordinated delivery of care with good and fast communication and effective team working between all health professionals involved. Specialist oncology nurses in local hospitals were considered a priority along with good facilities, accommodation, and transport for patients. There was no agreement on the best location for chemotherapy ( local or central). The only large difference of opinion between participants based in primary and secondary care concerned chemotherapy provision at local community hospitals ( primary care was in favour, hospital practitioners against, P<0.001). In making their decisions, participants took problems of access into account, but were also concerned with quality of care and feasibility in the current health service. Our findings show that more evidence is needed regarding the balance of risks and benefits of local chemotherapy provision. Overall, however, there is agreement on many principles for cancer care that could be translated into practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)821-827
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume89
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Keywords

  • cancer care
  • rural health services
  • consensus method
  • COLORECTAL-CANCER
  • URBAN DIFFERENCES
  • CARE
  • DIAGNOSIS
  • CENTRALIZATION
  • STAGE

Cite this

Providing cancer services to remote and rural areas: consensus study. / Stevenson, Lesley Ann; Campbell, Neil Crawford; Kiehlmann, Peter Alexander.

In: British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 89, No. 5, 2003, p. 821-827.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stevenson, Lesley Ann ; Campbell, Neil Crawford ; Kiehlmann, Peter Alexander. / Providing cancer services to remote and rural areas: consensus study. In: British Journal of Cancer. 2003 ; Vol. 89, No. 5. pp. 821-827.
@article{f21c33b91c55454ea46ec319a77520dc,
title = "Providing cancer services to remote and rural areas: consensus study",
abstract = "There is controversy about how cancer care should be provided to patients in remote and rural areas. The aim of this project was to measure consensus among health professionals who treat rural patients with cancer about priorities for cancer care. A modified Delphi process was used. Of 78 health professionals in Grampian, 62 responded (79{\%}). Of 49 items suggested, there was agreement on 26 (53{\%}), encompassing fast access to diagnosis, high-quality specialist treatment, and well-coordinated delivery of care with good and fast communication and effective team working between all health professionals involved. Specialist oncology nurses in local hospitals were considered a priority along with good facilities, accommodation, and transport for patients. There was no agreement on the best location for chemotherapy ( local or central). The only large difference of opinion between participants based in primary and secondary care concerned chemotherapy provision at local community hospitals ( primary care was in favour, hospital practitioners against, P<0.001). In making their decisions, participants took problems of access into account, but were also concerned with quality of care and feasibility in the current health service. Our findings show that more evidence is needed regarding the balance of risks and benefits of local chemotherapy provision. Overall, however, there is agreement on many principles for cancer care that could be translated into practice.",
keywords = "cancer care, rural health services, consensus method, COLORECTAL-CANCER, URBAN DIFFERENCES, CARE, DIAGNOSIS, CENTRALIZATION, STAGE",
author = "Stevenson, {Lesley Ann} and Campbell, {Neil Crawford} and Kiehlmann, {Peter Alexander}",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1038/sj.bjc.6601166",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "821--827",
journal = "British Journal of Cancer",
issn = "0007-0920",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Providing cancer services to remote and rural areas: consensus study

AU - Stevenson, Lesley Ann

AU - Campbell, Neil Crawford

AU - Kiehlmann, Peter Alexander

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - There is controversy about how cancer care should be provided to patients in remote and rural areas. The aim of this project was to measure consensus among health professionals who treat rural patients with cancer about priorities for cancer care. A modified Delphi process was used. Of 78 health professionals in Grampian, 62 responded (79%). Of 49 items suggested, there was agreement on 26 (53%), encompassing fast access to diagnosis, high-quality specialist treatment, and well-coordinated delivery of care with good and fast communication and effective team working between all health professionals involved. Specialist oncology nurses in local hospitals were considered a priority along with good facilities, accommodation, and transport for patients. There was no agreement on the best location for chemotherapy ( local or central). The only large difference of opinion between participants based in primary and secondary care concerned chemotherapy provision at local community hospitals ( primary care was in favour, hospital practitioners against, P<0.001). In making their decisions, participants took problems of access into account, but were also concerned with quality of care and feasibility in the current health service. Our findings show that more evidence is needed regarding the balance of risks and benefits of local chemotherapy provision. Overall, however, there is agreement on many principles for cancer care that could be translated into practice.

AB - There is controversy about how cancer care should be provided to patients in remote and rural areas. The aim of this project was to measure consensus among health professionals who treat rural patients with cancer about priorities for cancer care. A modified Delphi process was used. Of 78 health professionals in Grampian, 62 responded (79%). Of 49 items suggested, there was agreement on 26 (53%), encompassing fast access to diagnosis, high-quality specialist treatment, and well-coordinated delivery of care with good and fast communication and effective team working between all health professionals involved. Specialist oncology nurses in local hospitals were considered a priority along with good facilities, accommodation, and transport for patients. There was no agreement on the best location for chemotherapy ( local or central). The only large difference of opinion between participants based in primary and secondary care concerned chemotherapy provision at local community hospitals ( primary care was in favour, hospital practitioners against, P<0.001). In making their decisions, participants took problems of access into account, but were also concerned with quality of care and feasibility in the current health service. Our findings show that more evidence is needed regarding the balance of risks and benefits of local chemotherapy provision. Overall, however, there is agreement on many principles for cancer care that could be translated into practice.

KW - cancer care

KW - rural health services

KW - consensus method

KW - COLORECTAL-CANCER

KW - URBAN DIFFERENCES

KW - CARE

KW - DIAGNOSIS

KW - CENTRALIZATION

KW - STAGE

U2 - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601166

DO - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601166

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 821

EP - 827

JO - British Journal of Cancer

JF - British Journal of Cancer

SN - 0007-0920

IS - 5

ER -