Purpose of social networking use and victimisation: Are there any differences between university students and those not in HE?

Vladlena Benson (Corresponding Author), George Saridakis, Hemamali Tennakoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current literature widely reports successful uses of social media as a source of information, collaborative and learning tool for students in higher education. Although universities increasingly promote the use of Social Network Services (SNS) little is known about how students use them. Also the adverse effects of social media activity, such as cybercrime victimisation in HE, are under explored. Concerns over informal leisure use of SNS by students leading to cyber victimisation may help explain slow adoption of social media in education. This paper shows, however, that students use SNS in a similar way to those users who are not in education, with more that 60% using SNS for both socialising and gathering information. We find that students are less likely to be victims of cybercrime than non-students suggesting that SNS activity is less risky within the university lifespan. The implications of this study are significant for policy and practice for universities and educational authorities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)867-872
Number of pages6
JournalComputers in Human Behavior
Volume51
Issue numberPart B
Early online date26 Dec 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2015

Fingerprint

Social Networking
Crime Victims
Social Work
Social Support
Social Media
Students
Education
Leisure Activities
Victimization
Social Networks
Learning

Keywords

  • Adoption of technology
  • Cybercrime
  • Online behaviour
  • Social networking
  • Technology usage
  • Victimisation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Purpose of social networking use and victimisation : Are there any differences between university students and those not in HE? / Benson, Vladlena (Corresponding Author); Saridakis, George; Tennakoon, Hemamali.

In: Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 51, No. Part B, 01.10.2015, p. 867-872.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1132642548ba4a609242785c523e6b13,
title = "Purpose of social networking use and victimisation: Are there any differences between university students and those not in HE?",
abstract = "Current literature widely reports successful uses of social media as a source of information, collaborative and learning tool for students in higher education. Although universities increasingly promote the use of Social Network Services (SNS) little is known about how students use them. Also the adverse effects of social media activity, such as cybercrime victimisation in HE, are under explored. Concerns over informal leisure use of SNS by students leading to cyber victimisation may help explain slow adoption of social media in education. This paper shows, however, that students use SNS in a similar way to those users who are not in education, with more that 60{\%} using SNS for both socialising and gathering information. We find that students are less likely to be victims of cybercrime than non-students suggesting that SNS activity is less risky within the university lifespan. The implications of this study are significant for policy and practice for universities and educational authorities.",
keywords = "Adoption of technology, Cybercrime, Online behaviour, Social networking, Technology usage, Victimisation",
author = "Vladlena Benson and George Saridakis and Hemamali Tennakoon",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.034",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "867--872",
journal = "Computers in Human Behavior",
issn = "0747-5632",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "Part B",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Purpose of social networking use and victimisation

T2 - Are there any differences between university students and those not in HE?

AU - Benson, Vladlena

AU - Saridakis, George

AU - Tennakoon, Hemamali

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Current literature widely reports successful uses of social media as a source of information, collaborative and learning tool for students in higher education. Although universities increasingly promote the use of Social Network Services (SNS) little is known about how students use them. Also the adverse effects of social media activity, such as cybercrime victimisation in HE, are under explored. Concerns over informal leisure use of SNS by students leading to cyber victimisation may help explain slow adoption of social media in education. This paper shows, however, that students use SNS in a similar way to those users who are not in education, with more that 60% using SNS for both socialising and gathering information. We find that students are less likely to be victims of cybercrime than non-students suggesting that SNS activity is less risky within the university lifespan. The implications of this study are significant for policy and practice for universities and educational authorities.

AB - Current literature widely reports successful uses of social media as a source of information, collaborative and learning tool for students in higher education. Although universities increasingly promote the use of Social Network Services (SNS) little is known about how students use them. Also the adverse effects of social media activity, such as cybercrime victimisation in HE, are under explored. Concerns over informal leisure use of SNS by students leading to cyber victimisation may help explain slow adoption of social media in education. This paper shows, however, that students use SNS in a similar way to those users who are not in education, with more that 60% using SNS for both socialising and gathering information. We find that students are less likely to be victims of cybercrime than non-students suggesting that SNS activity is less risky within the university lifespan. The implications of this study are significant for policy and practice for universities and educational authorities.

KW - Adoption of technology

KW - Cybercrime

KW - Online behaviour

KW - Social networking

KW - Technology usage

KW - Victimisation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955607027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.034

DO - 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.034

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 867

EP - 872

JO - Computers in Human Behavior

JF - Computers in Human Behavior

SN - 0747-5632

IS - Part B

ER -