Quality, interpretation and presentation of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 data in randomised controlled trials

Kim Cocks, Madeleine T. King, Galina Velikova, Peter M. Fayers, Julia M. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To review reporting standard, presentation and interpretation for quality of life (QOL) outcomes in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30).
Methods: Cancer RCTs reporting EORTC QLQ-C30 data were identified and reviewed against a reporting quality checklist. Interpretation/presentation methods for QOL data were also recorded.
Results: Eighty-two papers were reviewed. Seventy percent met criteria for high quality reporting; 94% reported mean scores; 84% presented results in tables/graphs; 80% reported p-values or statistical significance. Clinical significance was addressed in 38%. Where clinical significance was not addressed, reliance was usually on statistical significance to interpret the results.
Discussion: EORTC QLQ-C30 results are generally reported well, although it was common to rely on statistical significance alone for interpreting results. Whilst interpretation in terms of clinical significance has improved in recent years, there is still a lack of robust clinical interpretation of QOL results even in papers reported to a high standard. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1793-1798
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume44
Issue number13
Early online date1 Jul 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2008

Keywords

  • quality of life
  • interpretation
  • QLQ-C30
  • reporting
  • clinical trials
  • CONSORT statement
  • prostate cancer
  • breast cancer
  • oncology
  • scores
  • issues

Cite this

Quality, interpretation and presentation of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 data in randomised controlled trials. / Cocks, Kim; King, Madeleine T.; Velikova, Galina; Fayers, Peter M.; Brown, Julia M.

In: European Journal of Cancer, Vol. 44, No. 13, 09.2008, p. 1793-1798.

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

@article{75ea5c4d40254648b52fd3e8199e57ed,
title = "Quality, interpretation and presentation of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 data in randomised controlled trials",
abstract = "Aim: To review reporting standard, presentation and interpretation for quality of life (QOL) outcomes in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Methods: Cancer RCTs reporting EORTC QLQ-C30 data were identified and reviewed against a reporting quality checklist. Interpretation/presentation methods for QOL data were also recorded. Results: Eighty-two papers were reviewed. Seventy percent met criteria for high quality reporting; 94{\%} reported mean scores; 84{\%} presented results in tables/graphs; 80{\%} reported p-values or statistical significance. Clinical significance was addressed in 38{\%}. Where clinical significance was not addressed, reliance was usually on statistical significance to interpret the results. Discussion: EORTC QLQ-C30 results are generally reported well, although it was common to rely on statistical significance alone for interpreting results. Whilst interpretation in terms of clinical significance has improved in recent years, there is still a lack of robust clinical interpretation of QOL results even in papers reported to a high standard. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "quality of life, interpretation, QLQ-C30, reporting, clinical trials, CONSORT statement, prostate cancer, breast cancer, oncology, scores, issues",
author = "Kim Cocks and King, {Madeleine T.} and Galina Velikova and Fayers, {Peter M.} and Brown, {Julia M.}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejca.2008.05.008",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1793--1798",
journal = "European Journal of Cancer",
issn = "0959-8049",
publisher = "ELSEVIER APPL SCI PUBL LTD",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality, interpretation and presentation of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 data in randomised controlled trials

AU - Cocks, Kim

AU - King, Madeleine T.

AU - Velikova, Galina

AU - Fayers, Peter M.

AU - Brown, Julia M.

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - Aim: To review reporting standard, presentation and interpretation for quality of life (QOL) outcomes in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Methods: Cancer RCTs reporting EORTC QLQ-C30 data were identified and reviewed against a reporting quality checklist. Interpretation/presentation methods for QOL data were also recorded. Results: Eighty-two papers were reviewed. Seventy percent met criteria for high quality reporting; 94% reported mean scores; 84% presented results in tables/graphs; 80% reported p-values or statistical significance. Clinical significance was addressed in 38%. Where clinical significance was not addressed, reliance was usually on statistical significance to interpret the results. Discussion: EORTC QLQ-C30 results are generally reported well, although it was common to rely on statistical significance alone for interpreting results. Whilst interpretation in terms of clinical significance has improved in recent years, there is still a lack of robust clinical interpretation of QOL results even in papers reported to a high standard. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Aim: To review reporting standard, presentation and interpretation for quality of life (QOL) outcomes in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Methods: Cancer RCTs reporting EORTC QLQ-C30 data were identified and reviewed against a reporting quality checklist. Interpretation/presentation methods for QOL data were also recorded. Results: Eighty-two papers were reviewed. Seventy percent met criteria for high quality reporting; 94% reported mean scores; 84% presented results in tables/graphs; 80% reported p-values or statistical significance. Clinical significance was addressed in 38%. Where clinical significance was not addressed, reliance was usually on statistical significance to interpret the results. Discussion: EORTC QLQ-C30 results are generally reported well, although it was common to rely on statistical significance alone for interpreting results. Whilst interpretation in terms of clinical significance has improved in recent years, there is still a lack of robust clinical interpretation of QOL results even in papers reported to a high standard. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - quality of life

KW - interpretation

KW - QLQ-C30

KW - reporting

KW - clinical trials

KW - CONSORT statement

KW - prostate cancer

KW - breast cancer

KW - oncology

KW - scores

KW - issues

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.05.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.05.008

M3 - Literature review

VL - 44

SP - 1793

EP - 1798

JO - European Journal of Cancer

JF - European Journal of Cancer

SN - 0959-8049

IS - 13

ER -