Quantifiers and epistemic contextualism

J. Ichikawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I defend a neo-Lewisean form of contextualism about knowledge attributions. Understanding the context-sensitivity of knowledge attributions in terms of the context-sensitivity of universal quantifiers provides an appealing approach to knowledge. Among the virtues of this approach are solutions to the skeptical paradox and the Gettier problem. I respond to influential objections to Lewis's account.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-398
Number of pages16
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Volume155
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Fingerprint

Attribution
Quantifiers
Context Sensitivity
Epistemic Contextualism
Contextualism
Universal Quantifier
Gettier Problem
Paradox

Keywords

  • knowledge
  • epistemology
  • contextualism
  • the Gettier problem
  • skepticism
  • the skeptical paradox
  • quantifiers
  • David Lewis

Cite this

Quantifiers and epistemic contextualism. / Ichikawa, J.

In: Philosophical Studies, Vol. 155, No. 3, 09.2011, p. 383-398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ichikawa, J. / Quantifiers and epistemic contextualism. In: Philosophical Studies. 2011 ; Vol. 155, No. 3. pp. 383-398.
@article{f471fa5ed6a44b79ab06beb6fc253f2b,
title = "Quantifiers and epistemic contextualism",
abstract = "I defend a neo-Lewisean form of contextualism about knowledge attributions. Understanding the context-sensitivity of knowledge attributions in terms of the context-sensitivity of universal quantifiers provides an appealing approach to knowledge. Among the virtues of this approach are solutions to the skeptical paradox and the Gettier problem. I respond to influential objections to Lewis's account.",
keywords = "knowledge, epistemology, contextualism, the Gettier problem, skepticism, the skeptical paradox, quantifiers, David Lewis",
author = "J. Ichikawa",
note = "For valuable conversations, and for and comments on previous drafts of this project, I am grateful to Jessica Brown, Yuri Cath, Stewart Cohen, Paul Dimmock, Benjamin Jarvis, Carrie Jenkins, Ernest Sosa, Jason Stanley, Brian Weatherson, and Crispin Wright.",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s11098-010-9576-2",
language = "English",
volume = "155",
pages = "383--398",
journal = "Philosophical Studies",
issn = "0031-8116",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifiers and epistemic contextualism

AU - Ichikawa, J.

N1 - For valuable conversations, and for and comments on previous drafts of this project, I am grateful to Jessica Brown, Yuri Cath, Stewart Cohen, Paul Dimmock, Benjamin Jarvis, Carrie Jenkins, Ernest Sosa, Jason Stanley, Brian Weatherson, and Crispin Wright.

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - I defend a neo-Lewisean form of contextualism about knowledge attributions. Understanding the context-sensitivity of knowledge attributions in terms of the context-sensitivity of universal quantifiers provides an appealing approach to knowledge. Among the virtues of this approach are solutions to the skeptical paradox and the Gettier problem. I respond to influential objections to Lewis's account.

AB - I defend a neo-Lewisean form of contextualism about knowledge attributions. Understanding the context-sensitivity of knowledge attributions in terms of the context-sensitivity of universal quantifiers provides an appealing approach to knowledge. Among the virtues of this approach are solutions to the skeptical paradox and the Gettier problem. I respond to influential objections to Lewis's account.

KW - knowledge

KW - epistemology

KW - contextualism

KW - the Gettier problem

KW - skepticism

KW - the skeptical paradox

KW - quantifiers

KW - David Lewis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052278824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11098-010-9576-2

DO - 10.1007/s11098-010-9576-2

M3 - Article

VL - 155

SP - 383

EP - 398

JO - Philosophical Studies

JF - Philosophical Studies

SN - 0031-8116

IS - 3

ER -