Quantifying the contribution of immigration to population dynamics

a review of methods, evidence and perspectives in birds and mammals

Alexandre Millon (Corresponding Author), Xavier Lambin, Sébastien Devillard, Michael Schaub

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The demography of a population is often reduced to the apparent (or local) survival of individuals and their realised fecundity within a study area defined according to logistical constraints rather than landscape features. Such demographics are then used to infer whether a local population contributes positively to population dynamics across a wider landscape context. Such a simplistic approach ignores a fundamental process underpinning population dynamics: dispersal. Indeed, it has long been accepted that immigration contributed by dispersers that emigrated from neighbouring populations may strongly influence the net growth of a local population. To date however, we lack a clear picture of how widely immigration rate varies both among and within populations, in relation to extrinsic and intrinsic ecological conditions, even for the best-studied avian and mammalian populations. This empirical knowledge gap precludes the emergence of a sound conceptual framework that ought to inform conservation and population ecology. This review, conducted on both birds and mammals, has thus three complementary objectives. First, we describe and evaluate the relative merits of methods used to quantify immigration and how they relate to widely applicable metrics. We identify two simple and unifying metrics to measure immigration: the immigration rate it defined as the ratio of the number of immigrants present in the population at time t + 1 and the total breeding population in year t, and πt , the proportion of immigrants among new recruits (i.e. new breeders). Two recently developed methods are likely to provide the most valuable data on immigration in the near future: individual parentage (rather than population) assignments based on genetic sampling, and spatially explicit integrated population models combining multiple sources of demographic data (survival, fecundity and population counts). Second, we report on a systematic literature review of studies providing a quantitative measure of immigration. Although the diversity of methods employed precludes detailed analyses, it appears that the number of immigrants exceeds locally born individuals in recruitment for most avian populations (median πt = 0.57, N = 45 estimates from 37 studies), a figure twofold higher than estimated for mammalian populations (median πt = 0.26, N = 33 estimates from 11 studies). Third, recent quantitative studies reveal that immigration can be the main driver of temporal variation in population growth rates, across a wide array of demographic and spatial contexts. To what extent immigration acts as a regulatory process has however been considered only rarely to date and deserves more attention. Overall, it is likely that most populations benefit from immigrants without necessarily being sink populations. Furthermore, we suggest that quantitative estimates of immigration should be core to future demographic studies and plead for more empirical evidence about the ways in which immigration interacts with local demographic processes to shape population dynamics. Finally, we discuss how to tackle spatial population dynamics by exploring, beyond the classical source-sink framework, the extent to which populations exchange individuals according to spatial scale and type of population distribution throughout the landscape.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBiological Reviews
Early online date5 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Aug 2019

Fingerprint

Population dynamics
Mammals
Emigration and Immigration
Population Dynamics
Birds
immigration
population dynamics
mammals
birds
Population
Population distribution
Demography
Ecology
methodology
demographic statistics
Conservation
Acoustic waves
Sampling
Fertility
fecundity

Keywords

  • balanced exchange hypothesis
  • dispersal
  • demography
  • immigration rate
  • integrated population models
  • metapopulation
  • parentage assignment
  • source-sink
  • LOCAL RECRUITMENT
  • HABITAT FRAGMENTATION
  • SOURCE-SINK DYNAMICS
  • MARK-RECAPTURE-RECOVERY
  • GENE FLOW
  • NATAL DISPERSAL
  • GREAT TIT
  • PARUS-MAJOR
  • DENSITY-DEPENDENCE
  • AMERICAN MINK

Cite this

Quantifying the contribution of immigration to population dynamics : a review of methods, evidence and perspectives in birds and mammals. / Millon, Alexandre (Corresponding Author); Lambin, Xavier; Devillard, Sébastien; Schaub, Michael.

In: Biological Reviews, 05.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{22bb849bd0864f778afd898e2f3fe3fe,
title = "Quantifying the contribution of immigration to population dynamics: a review of methods, evidence and perspectives in birds and mammals",
abstract = "The demography of a population is often reduced to the apparent (or local) survival of individuals and their realised fecundity within a study area defined according to logistical constraints rather than landscape features. Such demographics are then used to infer whether a local population contributes positively to population dynamics across a wider landscape context. Such a simplistic approach ignores a fundamental process underpinning population dynamics: dispersal. Indeed, it has long been accepted that immigration contributed by dispersers that emigrated from neighbouring populations may strongly influence the net growth of a local population. To date however, we lack a clear picture of how widely immigration rate varies both among and within populations, in relation to extrinsic and intrinsic ecological conditions, even for the best-studied avian and mammalian populations. This empirical knowledge gap precludes the emergence of a sound conceptual framework that ought to inform conservation and population ecology. This review, conducted on both birds and mammals, has thus three complementary objectives. First, we describe and evaluate the relative merits of methods used to quantify immigration and how they relate to widely applicable metrics. We identify two simple and unifying metrics to measure immigration: the immigration rate it defined as the ratio of the number of immigrants present in the population at time t + 1 and the total breeding population in year t, and πt , the proportion of immigrants among new recruits (i.e. new breeders). Two recently developed methods are likely to provide the most valuable data on immigration in the near future: individual parentage (rather than population) assignments based on genetic sampling, and spatially explicit integrated population models combining multiple sources of demographic data (survival, fecundity and population counts). Second, we report on a systematic literature review of studies providing a quantitative measure of immigration. Although the diversity of methods employed precludes detailed analyses, it appears that the number of immigrants exceeds locally born individuals in recruitment for most avian populations (median πt = 0.57, N = 45 estimates from 37 studies), a figure twofold higher than estimated for mammalian populations (median πt = 0.26, N = 33 estimates from 11 studies). Third, recent quantitative studies reveal that immigration can be the main driver of temporal variation in population growth rates, across a wide array of demographic and spatial contexts. To what extent immigration acts as a regulatory process has however been considered only rarely to date and deserves more attention. Overall, it is likely that most populations benefit from immigrants without necessarily being sink populations. Furthermore, we suggest that quantitative estimates of immigration should be core to future demographic studies and plead for more empirical evidence about the ways in which immigration interacts with local demographic processes to shape population dynamics. Finally, we discuss how to tackle spatial population dynamics by exploring, beyond the classical source-sink framework, the extent to which populations exchange individuals according to spatial scale and type of population distribution throughout the landscape.",
keywords = "balanced exchange hypothesis, dispersal, demography, immigration rate, integrated population models, metapopulation, parentage assignment, source-sink, LOCAL RECRUITMENT, HABITAT FRAGMENTATION, SOURCE-SINK DYNAMICS, MARK-RECAPTURE-RECOVERY, GENE FLOW, NATAL DISPERSAL, GREAT TIT, PARUS-MAJOR, DENSITY-DEPENDENCE, AMERICAN MINK",
author = "Alexandre Millon and Xavier Lambin and S{\'e}bastien Devillard and Michael Schaub",
note = "{\circledC} 2019 Cambridge Philosophical Society.",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1111/brv.12549",
language = "English",
journal = "Biological Reviews",
issn = "1464-7931",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying the contribution of immigration to population dynamics

T2 - a review of methods, evidence and perspectives in birds and mammals

AU - Millon, Alexandre

AU - Lambin, Xavier

AU - Devillard, Sébastien

AU - Schaub, Michael

N1 - © 2019 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

PY - 2019/8/5

Y1 - 2019/8/5

N2 - The demography of a population is often reduced to the apparent (or local) survival of individuals and their realised fecundity within a study area defined according to logistical constraints rather than landscape features. Such demographics are then used to infer whether a local population contributes positively to population dynamics across a wider landscape context. Such a simplistic approach ignores a fundamental process underpinning population dynamics: dispersal. Indeed, it has long been accepted that immigration contributed by dispersers that emigrated from neighbouring populations may strongly influence the net growth of a local population. To date however, we lack a clear picture of how widely immigration rate varies both among and within populations, in relation to extrinsic and intrinsic ecological conditions, even for the best-studied avian and mammalian populations. This empirical knowledge gap precludes the emergence of a sound conceptual framework that ought to inform conservation and population ecology. This review, conducted on both birds and mammals, has thus three complementary objectives. First, we describe and evaluate the relative merits of methods used to quantify immigration and how they relate to widely applicable metrics. We identify two simple and unifying metrics to measure immigration: the immigration rate it defined as the ratio of the number of immigrants present in the population at time t + 1 and the total breeding population in year t, and πt , the proportion of immigrants among new recruits (i.e. new breeders). Two recently developed methods are likely to provide the most valuable data on immigration in the near future: individual parentage (rather than population) assignments based on genetic sampling, and spatially explicit integrated population models combining multiple sources of demographic data (survival, fecundity and population counts). Second, we report on a systematic literature review of studies providing a quantitative measure of immigration. Although the diversity of methods employed precludes detailed analyses, it appears that the number of immigrants exceeds locally born individuals in recruitment for most avian populations (median πt = 0.57, N = 45 estimates from 37 studies), a figure twofold higher than estimated for mammalian populations (median πt = 0.26, N = 33 estimates from 11 studies). Third, recent quantitative studies reveal that immigration can be the main driver of temporal variation in population growth rates, across a wide array of demographic and spatial contexts. To what extent immigration acts as a regulatory process has however been considered only rarely to date and deserves more attention. Overall, it is likely that most populations benefit from immigrants without necessarily being sink populations. Furthermore, we suggest that quantitative estimates of immigration should be core to future demographic studies and plead for more empirical evidence about the ways in which immigration interacts with local demographic processes to shape population dynamics. Finally, we discuss how to tackle spatial population dynamics by exploring, beyond the classical source-sink framework, the extent to which populations exchange individuals according to spatial scale and type of population distribution throughout the landscape.

AB - The demography of a population is often reduced to the apparent (or local) survival of individuals and their realised fecundity within a study area defined according to logistical constraints rather than landscape features. Such demographics are then used to infer whether a local population contributes positively to population dynamics across a wider landscape context. Such a simplistic approach ignores a fundamental process underpinning population dynamics: dispersal. Indeed, it has long been accepted that immigration contributed by dispersers that emigrated from neighbouring populations may strongly influence the net growth of a local population. To date however, we lack a clear picture of how widely immigration rate varies both among and within populations, in relation to extrinsic and intrinsic ecological conditions, even for the best-studied avian and mammalian populations. This empirical knowledge gap precludes the emergence of a sound conceptual framework that ought to inform conservation and population ecology. This review, conducted on both birds and mammals, has thus three complementary objectives. First, we describe and evaluate the relative merits of methods used to quantify immigration and how they relate to widely applicable metrics. We identify two simple and unifying metrics to measure immigration: the immigration rate it defined as the ratio of the number of immigrants present in the population at time t + 1 and the total breeding population in year t, and πt , the proportion of immigrants among new recruits (i.e. new breeders). Two recently developed methods are likely to provide the most valuable data on immigration in the near future: individual parentage (rather than population) assignments based on genetic sampling, and spatially explicit integrated population models combining multiple sources of demographic data (survival, fecundity and population counts). Second, we report on a systematic literature review of studies providing a quantitative measure of immigration. Although the diversity of methods employed precludes detailed analyses, it appears that the number of immigrants exceeds locally born individuals in recruitment for most avian populations (median πt = 0.57, N = 45 estimates from 37 studies), a figure twofold higher than estimated for mammalian populations (median πt = 0.26, N = 33 estimates from 11 studies). Third, recent quantitative studies reveal that immigration can be the main driver of temporal variation in population growth rates, across a wide array of demographic and spatial contexts. To what extent immigration acts as a regulatory process has however been considered only rarely to date and deserves more attention. Overall, it is likely that most populations benefit from immigrants without necessarily being sink populations. Furthermore, we suggest that quantitative estimates of immigration should be core to future demographic studies and plead for more empirical evidence about the ways in which immigration interacts with local demographic processes to shape population dynamics. Finally, we discuss how to tackle spatial population dynamics by exploring, beyond the classical source-sink framework, the extent to which populations exchange individuals according to spatial scale and type of population distribution throughout the landscape.

KW - balanced exchange hypothesis

KW - dispersal

KW - demography

KW - immigration rate

KW - integrated population models

KW - metapopulation

KW - parentage assignment

KW - source-sink

KW - LOCAL RECRUITMENT

KW - HABITAT FRAGMENTATION

KW - SOURCE-SINK DYNAMICS

KW - MARK-RECAPTURE-RECOVERY

KW - GENE FLOW

KW - NATAL DISPERSAL

KW - GREAT TIT

KW - PARUS-MAJOR

KW - DENSITY-DEPENDENCE

KW - AMERICAN MINK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/quantifying-contribution-immigration-population-dynamics-review-methods-evidence-perspectives-birds

U2 - 10.1111/brv.12549

DO - 10.1111/brv.12549

M3 - Article

JO - Biological Reviews

JF - Biological Reviews

SN - 1464-7931

ER -