Quantifying the value of seismic structural health monitoring of buildings

Piotr Omenzetter, Maria Pina Limongelli, Ufuk Yazgan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The decision to adopt a monitoring system for a structure should be based on sound appraisal of the expected economic benefits of such decisions. These benefits can be quantified in terms of the reduction of the risks posed by the failure of the structure versus the cost of monitoring. This paper discusses a framework for rationalising the adoption of monitoring for buildings subjected to seismic risks. The approach adopted is that of the preposterior decision analysis. Methods for automatic damage detection and joint utilisation of monitoring and visual inspection data are considered from a point of view of how they can be used in the pre-posterior analysis. Two short numerical examples are included to illustrate the proposed conceptual developments.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication8th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, EWSHM 2016
PublisherNDT.net
Pages510-519
Number of pages10
Volume1
ISBN (Electronic)9781510827936
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Event8th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, EWSHM 2016 - Bilbao, Spain
Duration: 5 Jul 20168 Jul 2016

Conference

Conference8th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, EWSHM 2016
CountrySpain
CityBilbao
Period5/07/168/07/16

Fingerprint

Structure Collapse
Decision Support Techniques
Structural health monitoring
Risk Reduction Behavior
Joints
Economics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Monitoring
Health
Decision theory
Damage detection
Inspection
Acoustic waves
Costs

Keywords

  • Pre-posterior analysis
  • Seismic monitoring
  • Value of health monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Information Management
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Omenzetter, P., Limongelli, M. P., & Yazgan, U. (2016). Quantifying the value of seismic structural health monitoring of buildings. In 8th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, EWSHM 2016 (Vol. 1, pp. 510-519). NDT.net. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1209.4966

Quantifying the value of seismic structural health monitoring of buildings. / Omenzetter, Piotr; Limongelli, Maria Pina; Yazgan, Ufuk.

8th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, EWSHM 2016. Vol. 1 NDT.net, 2016. p. 510-519.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Omenzetter, P, Limongelli, MP & Yazgan, U 2016, Quantifying the value of seismic structural health monitoring of buildings. in 8th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, EWSHM 2016. vol. 1, NDT.net, pp. 510-519, 8th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, EWSHM 2016, Bilbao, Spain, 5/07/16. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1209.4966
Omenzetter P, Limongelli MP, Yazgan U. Quantifying the value of seismic structural health monitoring of buildings. In 8th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, EWSHM 2016. Vol. 1. NDT.net. 2016. p. 510-519 https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1209.4966
Omenzetter, Piotr ; Limongelli, Maria Pina ; Yazgan, Ufuk. / Quantifying the value of seismic structural health monitoring of buildings. 8th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, EWSHM 2016. Vol. 1 NDT.net, 2016. pp. 510-519
@inbook{0b30eeb6db144491bb8064be84a97855,
title = "Quantifying the value of seismic structural health monitoring of buildings",
abstract = "The decision to adopt a monitoring system for a structure should be based on sound appraisal of the expected economic benefits of such decisions. These benefits can be quantified in terms of the reduction of the risks posed by the failure of the structure versus the cost of monitoring. This paper discusses a framework for rationalising the adoption of monitoring for buildings subjected to seismic risks. The approach adopted is that of the preposterior decision analysis. Methods for automatic damage detection and joint utilisation of monitoring and visual inspection data are considered from a point of view of how they can be used in the pre-posterior analysis. Two short numerical examples are included to illustrate the proposed conceptual developments.",
keywords = "Pre-posterior analysis, Seismic monitoring, Value of health monitoring",
author = "Piotr Omenzetter and Limongelli, {Maria Pina} and Ufuk Yazgan",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.13140/RG.2.1.1209.4966",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "510--519",
booktitle = "8th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, EWSHM 2016",
publisher = "NDT.net",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Quantifying the value of seismic structural health monitoring of buildings

AU - Omenzetter, Piotr

AU - Limongelli, Maria Pina

AU - Yazgan, Ufuk

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The decision to adopt a monitoring system for a structure should be based on sound appraisal of the expected economic benefits of such decisions. These benefits can be quantified in terms of the reduction of the risks posed by the failure of the structure versus the cost of monitoring. This paper discusses a framework for rationalising the adoption of monitoring for buildings subjected to seismic risks. The approach adopted is that of the preposterior decision analysis. Methods for automatic damage detection and joint utilisation of monitoring and visual inspection data are considered from a point of view of how they can be used in the pre-posterior analysis. Two short numerical examples are included to illustrate the proposed conceptual developments.

AB - The decision to adopt a monitoring system for a structure should be based on sound appraisal of the expected economic benefits of such decisions. These benefits can be quantified in terms of the reduction of the risks posed by the failure of the structure versus the cost of monitoring. This paper discusses a framework for rationalising the adoption of monitoring for buildings subjected to seismic risks. The approach adopted is that of the preposterior decision analysis. Methods for automatic damage detection and joint utilisation of monitoring and visual inspection data are considered from a point of view of how they can be used in the pre-posterior analysis. Two short numerical examples are included to illustrate the proposed conceptual developments.

KW - Pre-posterior analysis

KW - Seismic monitoring

KW - Value of health monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994881297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.13140/RG.2.1.1209.4966

DO - 10.13140/RG.2.1.1209.4966

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

VL - 1

SP - 510

EP - 519

BT - 8th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, EWSHM 2016

PB - NDT.net

ER -