Quantifying wildlife watchers’ preferences to investigate the overlap between recreational and conservation value of natural areas

Francesca Mancini (Corresponding Author), George M. Coghill, David Lusseau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

1.Nature‐based recreation substantially benefits human wellbeing, for example, by improving physical and mental health. However, recreation can also have severe ecological impacts. The recreational value of landscapes and natural areas is often used to generate support for public spending in conservation. However, we still don't know whether nature‐based recreationists place greater recreational value on natural areas that have high conservation value compared to other green spaces.

2.Here, we determine which attributes of nature‐based tourism provide recreational services. We used pictures of wildlife posted on Flickr to quantify wildlife watching activities in Scotland. We then determined the environmental variables key to attracting wildlife watchers to a destination, such as protected areas (PAs), the perceived naturalness, and the presence of different types of infrastructure.

3.Infrastructure best predicts the intensity of wildlife watching activities in Scotland, while areas of high natural value are rarely used. PAs are weak attractors of wildlife watchers, with PAs designated to protect threatened habitats or species having low recreational value. In accessible and highly visited areas, higher biodiversity increases the intensity of wildlife watching activities.

4.Synthesis and applications. Areas of high natural and conservation value and areas of high recreational value do not tend to overlap. Recreational ecosystem services are mainly provided by the wider countryside and highly transformed landscapes, as opposed to wild ecosystems and protected areas designated to protect environmental features of high conservation value. These results question the synergy between the goals of recreation and those of conservation and the use of recreation as a justification for economic investment in conservation. During wildlife watching activities most people experience an urbanised, highly transformed nature; it will be important to determine how this human‐dominated nature can influence support for conservation of wild and remote areas.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)387-397
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
Volume56
Issue number2
Early online date20 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

protected area
naturalness
public spending
mental health
ecological impact
natural area
wildlife
ecosystem service
tourism
infrastructure
biodiversity
recreation
ecosystem
habitat
economics

Keywords

  • nature-based tourism
  • cultural ecosystem services
  • protected areas
  • naturalness
  • infrastructure
  • urban green networks
  • recreation
  • conservation
  • BIODIVERSITY
  • VISITATION
  • TOURISM
  • MAPPING RECREATION
  • LESSONS
  • DEMAND

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Quantifying wildlife watchers’ preferences to investigate the overlap between recreational and conservation value of natural areas. / Mancini, Francesca (Corresponding Author); Coghill, George M.; Lusseau, David.

In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 56, No. 2, 02.2019, p. 387-397.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{17df9044ef874c93a0052a2e9a69b095,
title = "Quantifying wildlife watchers’ preferences to investigate the overlap between recreational and conservation value of natural areas",
abstract = "1.Nature‐based recreation substantially benefits human wellbeing, for example, by improving physical and mental health. However, recreation can also have severe ecological impacts. The recreational value of landscapes and natural areas is often used to generate support for public spending in conservation. However, we still don't know whether nature‐based recreationists place greater recreational value on natural areas that have high conservation value compared to other green spaces.2.Here, we determine which attributes of nature‐based tourism provide recreational services. We used pictures of wildlife posted on Flickr to quantify wildlife watching activities in Scotland. We then determined the environmental variables key to attracting wildlife watchers to a destination, such as protected areas (PAs), the perceived naturalness, and the presence of different types of infrastructure.3.Infrastructure best predicts the intensity of wildlife watching activities in Scotland, while areas of high natural value are rarely used. PAs are weak attractors of wildlife watchers, with PAs designated to protect threatened habitats or species having low recreational value. In accessible and highly visited areas, higher biodiversity increases the intensity of wildlife watching activities.4.Synthesis and applications. Areas of high natural and conservation value and areas of high recreational value do not tend to overlap. Recreational ecosystem services are mainly provided by the wider countryside and highly transformed landscapes, as opposed to wild ecosystems and protected areas designated to protect environmental features of high conservation value. These results question the synergy between the goals of recreation and those of conservation and the use of recreation as a justification for economic investment in conservation. During wildlife watching activities most people experience an urbanised, highly transformed nature; it will be important to determine how this human‐dominated nature can influence support for conservation of wild and remote areas.",
keywords = "nature-based tourism, cultural ecosystem services, protected areas, naturalness, infrastructure, urban green networks, recreation, conservation, BIODIVERSITY, VISITATION, TOURISM, MAPPING RECREATION, LESSONS, DEMAND",
author = "Francesca Mancini and Coghill, {George M.} and David Lusseau",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2664.13274",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "387--397",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying wildlife watchers’ preferences to investigate the overlap between recreational and conservation value of natural areas

AU - Mancini, Francesca

AU - Coghill, George M.

AU - Lusseau, David

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - 1.Nature‐based recreation substantially benefits human wellbeing, for example, by improving physical and mental health. However, recreation can also have severe ecological impacts. The recreational value of landscapes and natural areas is often used to generate support for public spending in conservation. However, we still don't know whether nature‐based recreationists place greater recreational value on natural areas that have high conservation value compared to other green spaces.2.Here, we determine which attributes of nature‐based tourism provide recreational services. We used pictures of wildlife posted on Flickr to quantify wildlife watching activities in Scotland. We then determined the environmental variables key to attracting wildlife watchers to a destination, such as protected areas (PAs), the perceived naturalness, and the presence of different types of infrastructure.3.Infrastructure best predicts the intensity of wildlife watching activities in Scotland, while areas of high natural value are rarely used. PAs are weak attractors of wildlife watchers, with PAs designated to protect threatened habitats or species having low recreational value. In accessible and highly visited areas, higher biodiversity increases the intensity of wildlife watching activities.4.Synthesis and applications. Areas of high natural and conservation value and areas of high recreational value do not tend to overlap. Recreational ecosystem services are mainly provided by the wider countryside and highly transformed landscapes, as opposed to wild ecosystems and protected areas designated to protect environmental features of high conservation value. These results question the synergy between the goals of recreation and those of conservation and the use of recreation as a justification for economic investment in conservation. During wildlife watching activities most people experience an urbanised, highly transformed nature; it will be important to determine how this human‐dominated nature can influence support for conservation of wild and remote areas.

AB - 1.Nature‐based recreation substantially benefits human wellbeing, for example, by improving physical and mental health. However, recreation can also have severe ecological impacts. The recreational value of landscapes and natural areas is often used to generate support for public spending in conservation. However, we still don't know whether nature‐based recreationists place greater recreational value on natural areas that have high conservation value compared to other green spaces.2.Here, we determine which attributes of nature‐based tourism provide recreational services. We used pictures of wildlife posted on Flickr to quantify wildlife watching activities in Scotland. We then determined the environmental variables key to attracting wildlife watchers to a destination, such as protected areas (PAs), the perceived naturalness, and the presence of different types of infrastructure.3.Infrastructure best predicts the intensity of wildlife watching activities in Scotland, while areas of high natural value are rarely used. PAs are weak attractors of wildlife watchers, with PAs designated to protect threatened habitats or species having low recreational value. In accessible and highly visited areas, higher biodiversity increases the intensity of wildlife watching activities.4.Synthesis and applications. Areas of high natural and conservation value and areas of high recreational value do not tend to overlap. Recreational ecosystem services are mainly provided by the wider countryside and highly transformed landscapes, as opposed to wild ecosystems and protected areas designated to protect environmental features of high conservation value. These results question the synergy between the goals of recreation and those of conservation and the use of recreation as a justification for economic investment in conservation. During wildlife watching activities most people experience an urbanised, highly transformed nature; it will be important to determine how this human‐dominated nature can influence support for conservation of wild and remote areas.

KW - nature-based tourism

KW - cultural ecosystem services

KW - protected areas

KW - naturalness

KW - infrastructure

KW - urban green networks

KW - recreation

KW - conservation

KW - BIODIVERSITY

KW - VISITATION

KW - TOURISM

KW - MAPPING RECREATION

KW - LESSONS

KW - DEMAND

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055268266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/quantifying-wildlife-watchers-preferences-investigate-overlap-between-recreational-conservation-valu

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.13274

DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.13274

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 387

EP - 397

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 0021-8901

IS - 2

ER -