Quantitative data analysis of perceived barriers and motivators to physical activity in stroke survivors

SL Nicholson (Corresponding Author), C.A Greig, F Sniehotta, M Johnston, S J Lewis, M. E. T. McMurdo, D Johnston, J Scopes, GE Mead

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Physical activity after stroke is low, even though there are multiple health benefits. We explored stroke survivors’ perceived barriers, motivators, self-efficacy and the intention to physical activity.
Methods
Fifty independently mobile stroke survivors were recruited prior to hospital discharge. Participants rated nine possible motivators and four possible barriers based on The Mutrie Scale, as having “no influence”, “some influence” or “a major influence” on physical activity. Participants also rated their self-efficacy and intention to increasing walking.
Results
The most common motivator was ‘physical activity is good for health’ [34(68%)]. The most common barrier was ‘feeling too tired’ [24(48%)]. Intention and self-efficacy were high. Self-efficacy was graded as either 4 or 5 (highly confident) on a five-point scale by [34 (68%)] participants, whilst 42 (84%) participants “strongly agreed” or “agreed” that they intended to increase their walking.
Conclusion
Participants felt capable of increasing physical activity but fatigue was often perceived as a barrier to physical activity. This needs to be considered when encouraging stroke survivors to be more active.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-236
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

Fingerprint

stroke
data analysis
self-efficacy
health
fatigue

Keywords

  • stroke
  • barrier
  • motivator
  • self-efficacy
  • physical activity

Cite this

Quantitative data analysis of perceived barriers and motivators to physical activity in stroke survivors. / Nicholson, SL (Corresponding Author); Greig, C.A; Sniehotta, F; Johnston, M; Lewis, S J ; McMurdo, M. E. T.; Johnston, D; Scopes, J; Mead, GE.

In: Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, Vol. 47, No. 3, 09.2017, p. 231-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nicholson, SL ; Greig, C.A ; Sniehotta, F ; Johnston, M ; Lewis, S J ; McMurdo, M. E. T. ; Johnston, D ; Scopes, J ; Mead, GE. / Quantitative data analysis of perceived barriers and motivators to physical activity in stroke survivors. In: Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 2017 ; Vol. 47, No. 3. pp. 231-236.
@article{c805e3ea7146436587fb23ea3858ebd3,
title = "Quantitative data analysis of perceived barriers and motivators to physical activity in stroke survivors",
abstract = "BackgroundPhysical activity after stroke is low, even though there are multiple health benefits. We explored stroke survivors’ perceived barriers, motivators, self-efficacy and the intention to physical activity.MethodsFifty independently mobile stroke survivors were recruited prior to hospital discharge. Participants rated nine possible motivators and four possible barriers based on The Mutrie Scale, as having “no influence”, “some influence” or “a major influence” on physical activity. Participants also rated their self-efficacy and intention to increasing walking.ResultsThe most common motivator was ‘physical activity is good for health’ [34(68{\%})]. The most common barrier was ‘feeling too tired’ [24(48{\%})]. Intention and self-efficacy were high. Self-efficacy was graded as either 4 or 5 (highly confident) on a five-point scale by [34 (68{\%})] participants, whilst 42 (84{\%}) participants “strongly agreed” or “agreed” that they intended to increase their walking.ConclusionParticipants felt capable of increasing physical activity but fatigue was often perceived as a barrier to physical activity. This needs to be considered when encouraging stroke survivors to be more active.",
keywords = "stroke, barrier, motivator, self-efficacy, physical activity",
author = "SL Nicholson and C.A Greig and F Sniehotta and M Johnston and Lewis, {S J} and McMurdo, {M. E. T.} and D Johnston and J Scopes and GE Mead",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.4997/JRCPE.2017.304",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "231--236",
journal = "Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh",
issn = "1478-2715",
publisher = "Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative data analysis of perceived barriers and motivators to physical activity in stroke survivors

AU - Nicholson, SL

AU - Greig, C.A

AU - Sniehotta, F

AU - Johnston, M

AU - Lewis, S J

AU - McMurdo, M. E. T.

AU - Johnston, D

AU - Scopes, J

AU - Mead, GE

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - BackgroundPhysical activity after stroke is low, even though there are multiple health benefits. We explored stroke survivors’ perceived barriers, motivators, self-efficacy and the intention to physical activity.MethodsFifty independently mobile stroke survivors were recruited prior to hospital discharge. Participants rated nine possible motivators and four possible barriers based on The Mutrie Scale, as having “no influence”, “some influence” or “a major influence” on physical activity. Participants also rated their self-efficacy and intention to increasing walking.ResultsThe most common motivator was ‘physical activity is good for health’ [34(68%)]. The most common barrier was ‘feeling too tired’ [24(48%)]. Intention and self-efficacy were high. Self-efficacy was graded as either 4 or 5 (highly confident) on a five-point scale by [34 (68%)] participants, whilst 42 (84%) participants “strongly agreed” or “agreed” that they intended to increase their walking.ConclusionParticipants felt capable of increasing physical activity but fatigue was often perceived as a barrier to physical activity. This needs to be considered when encouraging stroke survivors to be more active.

AB - BackgroundPhysical activity after stroke is low, even though there are multiple health benefits. We explored stroke survivors’ perceived barriers, motivators, self-efficacy and the intention to physical activity.MethodsFifty independently mobile stroke survivors were recruited prior to hospital discharge. Participants rated nine possible motivators and four possible barriers based on The Mutrie Scale, as having “no influence”, “some influence” or “a major influence” on physical activity. Participants also rated their self-efficacy and intention to increasing walking.ResultsThe most common motivator was ‘physical activity is good for health’ [34(68%)]. The most common barrier was ‘feeling too tired’ [24(48%)]. Intention and self-efficacy were high. Self-efficacy was graded as either 4 or 5 (highly confident) on a five-point scale by [34 (68%)] participants, whilst 42 (84%) participants “strongly agreed” or “agreed” that they intended to increase their walking.ConclusionParticipants felt capable of increasing physical activity but fatigue was often perceived as a barrier to physical activity. This needs to be considered when encouraging stroke survivors to be more active.

KW - stroke

KW - barrier

KW - motivator

KW - self-efficacy

KW - physical activity

U2 - 10.4997/JRCPE.2017.304

DO - 10.4997/JRCPE.2017.304

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 231

EP - 236

JO - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

JF - Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

SN - 1478-2715

IS - 3

ER -