Quare? Argument in David Daube, after Karl Popper

Ernest Philip Metzger

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    This article considers the method of argument favoured by David Daube (1909-1999), a scholar of Roman and biblical law. It suggests that Daube used a method of argument championed by Karl Popper (1992-1994), a philosopher of science.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationLaw for All Times: Essays in Memory of David Daube Roman Law Society of America
    EditorsE Metzger
    PublisherRoman Law Society of America
    Pages27-58
    Number of pages31
    ISBN (Print)0-9764-1490-2
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Publication series

    NameRoman Legal Tradition
    Volume2

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Quare? Argument in David Daube, after Karl Popper'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Metzger, E. P. (2004). Quare? Argument in David Daube, after Karl Popper. In E. Metzger (Ed.), Law for All Times: Essays in Memory of David Daube Roman Law Society of America (pp. 27-58). (Roman Legal Tradition; Vol. 2). Roman Law Society of America. http://hdl.handle.net/2164/34